Skip to content

[Benchmarks] optimize fused_gemm_benchmark - #7836

Open
JianyuLi01 wants to merge 1 commit into
intel:mainfrom
JianyuLi01:opt_fused_gemm_benchmark
Open

[Benchmarks] optimize fused_gemm_benchmark#7836
JianyuLi01 wants to merge 1 commit into
intel:mainfrom
JianyuLi01:opt_fused_gemm_benchmark

Conversation

@JianyuLi01

Copy link
Copy Markdown

With this change on B70, we can have ~10% uplift for large workloads (M, N, K = [220000, 8192, 512]) and ~25% uplift for small workloads (M, N, K = [256, 512, 512]).

New contributor declaration

  • I am not making a trivial change, such as fixing a typo in a comment.

  • I have written a PR description following these
    rules.

  • I have run pre-commit run --from-ref origin/main --to-ref HEAD.

  • Select one of the following.

    • I have added tests.
      • /test for lit tests
      • /unittest for C++ tests
      • /python/test for end-to-end tests
    • This PR does not need a test because FILL THIS IN.
  • Select one of the following.

    • I have not added any lit tests.
    • The lit tests I have added follow these best practices,
      including the "tests should be minimal" section. (Usually running Python code
      and using the instructions it generates is not minimal.)

With this change on B70, we can have ~10% uplift for large workloads
(M, N, K = [220000,  8192,  512]) and ~25% uplift for small workloads
(M, N, K = [256, 512, 512]).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant