Skip to content

Conversation

@srittau
Copy link
Collaborator

@srittau srittau commented Sep 11, 2023

Cf. #10592

Copy link
Member

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we add something in the extra_description field noting that upstream does have a py.typed, but that these stubs might be useful anyway?

Copy link
Member

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Stubsabot will file a PR trying to mark these stubs as obsolete again, but we can mark it as "DO-NOT-MERGE".

We may possibly want to add some kind of stubsabot_ignore field to METADATA.toml files, for stubs packages where we just want stubsabot to go away for now. Right now we've got redis and tree-sitter; previously we had pyvmomi (see discussion in #10149)

@srittau srittau merged commit c31e12f into python:main Sep 12, 2023
@srittau srittau deleted the redis-removal branch September 12, 2023 15:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants