Skip to content

Conversation

@OwenKephart
Copy link
Contributor

Summary & Motivation

How I Tested These Changes

Changelog

Insert changelog entry or delete this section.

Copy link
Contributor Author

OwenKephart commented Jan 14, 2026

This was referenced Jan 14, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Deploy preview for dagit-core-storybook ready!

✅ Preview
https://dagit-core-storybook-g3kk7ilgw-elementl.vercel.app
https://01-13--pac-gql-backend.core-storybook.dagster-docs.io

Built with commit aafa579.
This pull request is being automatically deployed with vercel-action

@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-09-_pac_add_assetcheckstatuscachevalue branch from 04a0928 to 2d22edf Compare January 14, 2026 19:44
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch from ee869fb to 24088d1 Compare January 14, 2026 19:44
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-09-_pac_add_assetcheckstatuscachevalue branch from 2d22edf to a46ebcd Compare January 14, 2026 21:10
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch 2 times, most recently from 413e5b2 to 9de34a6 Compare January 14, 2026 21:45
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-09-_pac_add_assetcheckstatuscachevalue branch 2 times, most recently from 41c2116 to 8924e96 Compare January 14, 2026 23:04
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch 2 times, most recently from 6c29e1e to b61afb6 Compare January 16, 2026 00:42
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-09-_pac_add_assetcheckstatuscachevalue branch from 8924e96 to 31a51b3 Compare January 16, 2026 00:42
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch from b61afb6 to 72de2cb Compare January 16, 2026 00:43
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-09-_pac_add_assetcheckstatuscachevalue branch from 31a51b3 to 3fd86b4 Compare January 16, 2026 00:43
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch from 72de2cb to d17ed50 Compare January 16, 2026 01:03
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-09-_pac_add_assetcheckstatuscachevalue branch 2 times, most recently from 18cc9f0 to 2a99818 Compare January 16, 2026 01:15
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch 2 times, most recently from 11982eb to cf41ddf Compare January 16, 2026 20:41
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-09-_pac_add_assetcheckstatuscachevalue branch from 2a99818 to e9e1b75 Compare January 16, 2026 20:41
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-09-_pac_add_assetcheckstatuscachevalue branch from e9e1b75 to ca6ec29 Compare January 16, 2026 21:44
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch from cd6e372 to 4e18318 Compare January 20, 2026 20:48
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-09-_pac_add_assetcheckstatuscachevalue branch from b2d651b to b6a9634 Compare January 20, 2026 23:44
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch 2 times, most recently from 01b1c94 to d8da365 Compare January 21, 2026 00:01
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-09-_pac_add_assetcheckstatuscachevalue branch from b6a9634 to 3c493b4 Compare January 21, 2026 00:01
@OwenKephart OwenKephart changed the base branch from 01-09-_pac_add_assetcheckstatuscachevalue to graphite-base/33253 January 22, 2026 00:11
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch from d8da365 to 1815cf2 Compare January 22, 2026 00:11
@OwenKephart OwenKephart changed the base branch from graphite-base/33253 to 01-21-_pac_move_to_partitionkeyfilter January 22, 2026 00:12
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch from 1815cf2 to 0b675d3 Compare January 22, 2026 03:20
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-21-_pac_move_to_partitionkeyfilter branch from db921e5 to 01c4dff Compare January 22, 2026 03:20
@OwenKephart OwenKephart requested review from gibsondan and prha January 22, 2026 18:36
@OwenKephart OwenKephart changed the base branch from 01-21-_pac_move_to_partitionkeyfilter to graphite-base/33253 January 22, 2026 21:25
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch from 0b675d3 to 043aa4e Compare January 22, 2026 21:25
@OwenKephart OwenKephart changed the base branch from graphite-base/33253 to 01-22-_pac_reverse_order_of_check_event___asset_event_creation January 22, 2026 21:25
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch from 043aa4e to e34146a Compare January 22, 2026 21:55
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-22-_pac_reverse_order_of_check_event___asset_event_creation branch 2 times, most recently from 1601a4b to 8deb6a2 Compare January 22, 2026 21:57
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch from e34146a to 390d0b2 Compare January 22, 2026 21:57
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-22-_pac_reverse_order_of_check_event___asset_event_creation branch from 8deb6a2 to eee594c Compare January 22, 2026 23:16
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch from 390d0b2 to cc394fd Compare January 22, 2026 23:16
Copy link
Member

@gibsondan gibsondan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this all seems reasonable but the test coverage seems a little light - are you confident we have all this gnarly 2d dimension stuff covered / all the various partition types and statuses / stressing the run-length encoding / etc.?

Comment on lines 1422 to 1424
asset_check_support = graphene_info.context.instance.get_asset_check_support()
if asset_check_support == AssetCheckInstanceSupport.NEEDS_MIGRATION:
return GrapheneAssetCheckNeedsMigrationError(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i assume you meant to delete this block

- MultiPartitionsDefinition in partitions_def → build_multi_partition_statuses_for_checks()
- Otherwise → build_default_partition_statuses_for_checks()
Note: Missing status is calculated on the frontend as the complement of all known statuses.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

heh I had to look this one up for review

Comment on lines +278 to +282
secondary_serializable_subsets[status] = SerializableEntitySubset.from_coercible_value(
key,
list(secondary_subset.get_partition_keys()),
partitions_def.secondary_dimension.partitions_def,
)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this method can raise an exception no? if there's something invalid about the subset now?

Comment on lines +447 to +449
partition_status = await AssetCheckState.gen(
graphene_info.context, (check_key, current_partition_def)
)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will be able to batch multiple keys right? not sure if we ever do that for this particular resolver

@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-22-_pac_reverse_order_of_check_event___asset_event_creation branch from eee594c to 92673d1 Compare January 23, 2026 00:46
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 01-13-_pac_gql_backend branch from cc394fd to aafa579 Compare January 23, 2026 00:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants