feat: allow hover to file #1177
Open
+151
−62
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
WalkthroughRename startup parameter Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 2 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![codescene-delta-analysis[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/53921?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/internal/model.go (2)
741-753: Consider extracting cursor positioning to reduce complexity.The cursor positioning logic is functionally correct and clears
targetFileappropriately. However, thegetFilePanelItemsfunction already exceeds the cognitive complexity threshold (33 > 20 per CI), and this addition increases it further.Consider extracting this block to a helper method:
func (panel *filePanel) positionCursorOnTargetFile() { if panel.targetFile == "" { return } for idx, el := range panel.element { if el.name == panel.targetFile { panel.cursor = idx if idx > 0 { panel.render = idx - 1 } break } } panel.targetFile = "" }Then call it with:
m.fileModel.filePanels[i].positionCursorOnTargetFile()
746-748: Consider viewport-aware render positioning.The current render adjustment (
render = idx - 1) places the cursor one position below the top of the viewport. This works but might not provide optimal visibility, especially for files near the beginning or end of the list.For better UX, consider centering the cursor in the viewport:
if el.name == tf { m.fileModel.filePanels[i].cursor = idx // Center the cursor in viewport when possible viewportHeight := m.mainPanelHeight - 3 // account for header halfViewport := viewportHeight / 2 if idx >= halfViewport { m.fileModel.filePanels[i].render = idx - halfViewport } else { m.fileModel.filePanels[i].render = 0 } break }This is an optional enhancement—the current implementation is functional.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
plan.md(1 hunks)src/internal/model.go(1 hunks)src/internal/type.go(1 hunks)src/internal/type_utils.go(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1040
File: src/internal/function.go:58-58
Timestamp: 2025-09-05T08:04:14.324Z
Learning: lazysegtree asked about "dual-panel functionality" and "secondary focus" in the superfile codebase. The system actually supports multiple file panels (not specifically dual-panel), where users can create/close panels and navigate between them. The old `secondFocus` state was used to mark non-active panels when multiple panels were open, not for a specific dual-panel feature. The focus states were: noneFocus (no file panel focused), focus (active panel), and secondFocus (inactive panels).
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.721Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/model_render.go:329-341
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T14:11:21.380Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer help menu rendering optimizations and other technical debt improvements to separate GitHub issues when the current PR scope has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking performance improvements for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 985
File: src/internal/model.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T01:49:30.040Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers maintaining code correctness through proper design and invariants rather than adding defensive bounds checks at every slice access point, viewing such defensive programming as "duct taping" that can mask actual bugs instead of fixing them at their source.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go:7-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T14:49:31.221Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep test-only code simple without adding production-level concerns like goroutine synchronization, cancellation contexts, or complex lifecycle management, even when such patterns might prevent potential issues, since the complexity isn't justified for test utilities.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:149-149
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T13:29:11.771Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep PR scope focused on the primary objectives and considers pre-existing technical debt issues as out of scope for migration/refactoring PRs, preferring to defer such issues to separate GitHub issues rather than expanding the current PR scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
📚 Learning: 2025-06-24T03:17:11.949Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 881
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:104-104
Timestamp: 2025-06-24T03:17:11.949Z
Learning: In superfile's LoadTomlFile function, error handling should follow this pattern: use PrintfAndExit for critical errors that prevent application functionality (config corruption, file system failures during fixing), and use fmt.Println with errorPrefix for non-critical errors that users should see but can continue from (missing fields when not fixing, cleanup warnings).
Applied to files:
src/internal/type_utils.go
📚 Learning: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Applied to files:
plan.md
📚 Learning: 2025-09-05T08:04:14.324Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1040
File: src/internal/function.go:58-58
Timestamp: 2025-09-05T08:04:14.324Z
Learning: lazysegtree asked about "dual-panel functionality" and "secondary focus" in the superfile codebase. The system actually supports multiple file panels (not specifically dual-panel), where users can create/close panels and navigate between them. The old `secondFocus` state was used to mark non-active panels when multiple panels were open, not for a specific dual-panel feature. The focus states were: noneFocus (no file panel focused), focus (active panel), and secondFocus (inactive panels).
Applied to files:
plan.md
🧬 Code graph analysis (4)
src/internal/type.go (4)
src/internal/file_panel.go (3)
panel(11-16)panel(23-28)panel(31-41)src/internal/handle_file_operations.go (2)
m(78-101)m(30-37)src/internal/test_utils.go (2)
setFilePanelSelectedItemByLocation(224-229)setFilePanelSelectedItemByName(231-236)src/internal/handle_panel_movement.go (1)
panel(122-136)
src/internal/type_utils.go (1)
src/internal/file_panel.go (1)
panel(44-90)
src/internal/model.go (2)
src/internal/test_utils.go (1)
setFilePanelSelectedItemByLocation(224-229)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down_test.go (1)
Test_filePanelUpDown(9-127)
plan.md (3)
src/internal/file_panel.go (2)
panel(44-90)panel(23-28)src/internal/handle_panel_movement.go (3)
m(27-66)panel(122-136)m(96-111)src/internal/model_zoxide_test.go (1)
updateCurrentFilePanelDirOfTestModel(30-34)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Go CI
src/internal/model.go
[error] 698-698: golangci-lint cognitive complexity check failed: function (*model).getFilePanelItems has cognitive complexity 33 (>20). Command: 'golangci-lint run --timeout 3m'.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/internal/type.go (1)
170-170: LGTM! Clean field addition.The
targetFilefield is well-named and documented, clearly indicating its purpose for cursor positioning after panel load.src/internal/type_utils.go (1)
51-82: LGTM! File path detection logic is sound.The implementation correctly detects when the input path is a file and extracts the parent directory and filename. Using
os.Stat(which follows symlinks) aligns with the documented behavior in plan.md. Error handling gracefully defaults to emptytargetFilewhen the path doesn't exist or is inaccessible.plan.md (1)
1-73: Well-documented implementation plan.The plan clearly outlines the approach, edge cases, and verification steps. The implementation matches the specification accurately.
Deploying superfile with
|
| Latest commit: |
7803edc
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://dbf59fa8.superfile.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://allow-hover-to-file.superfile.pages.dev |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/internal/config_function.go (1)
94-118: Path handling logic is sound; consider aligning log naming with new “paths” semanticsThe loop correctly:
- Applies a default directory for empty entries.
- Resolves each entry against
cwd.- Falls back through zoxide (using the original input) and finally
HomeDirwhenos.Statfails.This matches the intended “path (file or dir)” behavior without broadening scope elsewhere.
One small nit: the error log message
"cannot get stats for firstFilePanelDir"and the key name still talk about “Dir” even though this function now clearly handles generic paths. For future readers, you might want to rename that message/key to say “path” (and possibly include the actual path in the log fields) when you next touch this area.plan.md (1)
1-92: Plan is precise and aligned with the implemented behavior; one minor naming mismatchThis plan does a good job of scoping the change (per-panel
targetFile, file-vs-dir handling indefaultFilePanel, and post-load cursor positioning) and calling out where renames are intentionally limited.Minor consistency nit: in the “Variable Naming Cleanup” section you note updating comments/logs that say “dir” when a file path is valid;
src/internal/config_function.gostill logs"cannot get stats for firstFilePanelDir". Either updating that log message or adjusting the wording here would keep the plan fully in sync with the code.Otherwise this document reads clearly and matches the actual diff.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
plan.md(1 hunks)src/internal/config_function.go(2 hunks)src/internal/type_utils.go(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/internal/type_utils.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (6)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1040
File: src/internal/function.go:58-58
Timestamp: 2025-09-05T08:04:14.324Z
Learning: lazysegtree asked about "dual-panel functionality" and "secondary focus" in the superfile codebase. The system actually supports multiple file panels (not specifically dual-panel), where users can create/close panels and navigate between them. The old `secondFocus` state was used to mark non-active panels when multiple panels were open, not for a specific dual-panel feature. The focus states were: noneFocus (no file panel focused), focus (active panel), and secondFocus (inactive panels).
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.721Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/model_render.go:329-341
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T14:11:21.380Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer help menu rendering optimizations and other technical debt improvements to separate GitHub issues when the current PR scope has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking performance improvements for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 985
File: src/internal/model.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T01:49:30.040Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers maintaining code correctness through proper design and invariants rather than adding defensive bounds checks at every slice access point, viewing such defensive programming as "duct taping" that can mask actual bugs instead of fixing them at their source.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go:7-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T14:49:31.221Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep test-only code simple without adding production-level concerns like goroutine synchronization, cancellation contexts, or complex lifecycle management, even when such patterns might prevent potential issues, since the complexity isn't justified for test utilities.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:149-149
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T13:29:11.771Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep PR scope focused on the primary objectives and considers pre-existing technical debt issues as out of scope for migration/refactoring PRs, preferring to defer such issues to separate GitHub issues rather than expanding the current PR scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
📚 Learning: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Applied to files:
plan.md
📚 Learning: 2025-09-05T08:04:14.324Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1040
File: src/internal/function.go:58-58
Timestamp: 2025-09-05T08:04:14.324Z
Learning: lazysegtree asked about "dual-panel functionality" and "secondary focus" in the superfile codebase. The system actually supports multiple file panels (not specifically dual-panel), where users can create/close panels and navigate between them. The old `secondFocus` state was used to mark non-active panels when multiple panels were open, not for a specific dual-panel feature. The focus states were: noneFocus (no file panel focused), focus (active panel), and secondFocus (inactive panels).
Applied to files:
plan.md
📚 Learning: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, the preview panel refactoring created duplicate ImagePreviewer instances (one in defaultModelConfig and another in preview.New()), which caused image preview crashes. The refactoring also renamed SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and moved global batCmd to per-instance batCmd initialization, all contributing to crashes during image preview and test failures.
Applied to files:
plan.md
📚 Learning: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Applied to files:
plan.md
📚 Learning: 2025-09-20T01:40:50.076Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1081
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/directory_utils.go:103-112
Timestamp: 2025-09-20T01:40:50.076Z
Learning: lazysegtree identified code duplication between removeNotExistingDirectories and TogglePinnedDirectory functions in src/internal/ui/sidebar/directory_utils.go, specifically 6 lines of JSON marshaling and file writing logic. He prefers to track such duplication fixes in separate GitHub issues and suggests either extracting common util functions or creating a PinnedDir manager for centralized Read/Write operations to PinnedFile.
Applied to files:
plan.md
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
src/internal/config_function.go (4)
src/internal/common/default_config.go (1)
Config(11-11)src/internal/utils/file_utils.go (1)
ResolveAbsPath(186-199)src/internal/file_panel.go (1)
panel(44-90)src/internal/model.go (1)
m(521-529)
plan.md (2)
src/internal/file_panel.go (3)
panel(44-90)panel(23-28)panel(11-16)src/internal/model_navigation_test.go (1)
TestFilePanelNavigation(15-149)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/internal/config_function.go (1)
83-83: Internal helper rename and call-site usage look goodThe switch to
updateFirstFilePanelPaths(firstFilePanelDirs, cwd, zClient)keeps the initialization flow the same while making the helper’s purpose (handling generic paths, not just directories) clearer. No behavioral concerns here.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
lazysegtree
force-pushed
the
allow-hover-to-file
branch
from
7dde8ae to
8242ebf
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
lazysegtree
commented
Dec 7, 2025
|
|
||
| // Render and update file panel items. Check for changes and updates in files and | ||
| // folders in the current directory. | ||
| func (m *model) getFilePanelItems() { |
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@coderabbitai Thoroughly review this refactoring. Ensure it didn't break anything.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the actual diff for getFilePanelItems function and surrounding code
echo "=== Git diff for src/internal/model.go (getFilePanelItems area) ==="
git diff main HEAD -- src/internal/model.go | head -300
echo -e "\n=== Checking type.go for targetFile field ==="
fd -t f "^type.go$" src/internal | xargs grep -A2 -B2 "targetFile"
echo -e "\n=== Checking type_utils.go for defaultFilePanel changes ==="
fd -t f "^type_utils.go$" src/internal | xargs cat | grep -A30 "func defaultFilePanel"
echo -e "\n=== Checking config_function.go for renamed function ==="
fd -t f "^config_function.go$" src/internal | xargs grep -A5 "updateFirstFilePanelPaths"
echo -e "\n=== Looking for tests related to targetFile or hover ==="
fd -t f "_test.go$" | xargs rg -l "targetFile|hover" 2>/dev/null || echo "No test files found with targetFile or hover"
echo -e "\n=== Checking if there are any TODO or FIXME comments in the changed files ==="
rg -n "TODO|FIXME" src/internal/model.go src/internal/type.go src/internal/type_utils.go src/internal/config_function.go 2>/dev/null | head -20
Length of output: 8795
@lazysegtree, I've thoroughly reviewed the refactoring. The changes look solid ✓
Summary
The refactoring correctly extracts getFilePanelItems() into focused helper methods while preserving all original logic:
-
shouldSkipPanelUpdate()- Throttling logic extracted correctly. Early returns match originalcontinuestatements. -
focusPanelNeedsReRender()- Directory change detection logic preserved identically, cleaner structure. -
getElementsForPanel()- Search bar check and element retrieval logic unchanged. -
applyTargetFileCursor()- New feature implementation:- ✓ Correctly finds matching element by name
- ✓ Sets cursor to matching index
- ✓ Positions render to
idx-1for proper scroll behavior - ✓ Clears
targetFileafter processing (prevents repeated attempts even if no match) - Minor: unnecessary
elseafterreturn(line 762)
-
defaultFilePanel()enhancement:- ✓ Uses
os.Stat()to detect files (correctly follows symlinks) - ✓ Extracts filename with
filepath.Base(), directory withfilepath.Dir() - ✓ Safe fallback: treats as directory on stat error
- ✓ Uses
-
Variable renaming:
firstFilePanelDirs→firstPanelPathsmakes sense since paths can now be files.
Edge Cases Handled
- Empty elements list: Loop handles correctly, clears
targetFile - No matching file:
targetFilecleared (prevents repeated searches) - Multiple files with same name: Selects first match (correct)
- Symlinks:
os.Stat()resolves them (correct behavior)
Minor Suggestion
In applyTargetFileCursor(), the else after return is unnecessary:
if tf := m.fileModel.filePanels[panelIndex].targetFile; tf == "" {
return
}
// Remove the 'else' and unindent the following block
for idx, el := range elements {
// ...
}
m.fileModel.filePanels[panelIndex].targetFile = ""Verdict: No bugs detected. The refactoring is well-executed with improved readability. The new hover-to-file feature integrates cleanly.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis Results
[src/internal/common/type.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
ModelAction interface {
String() string
}
[src/internal/common/type.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
NoAction struct {
}
[src/internal/common/type.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
ShellCommandAction struct {
Command string
}
[src/internal/common/type.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
SplitPanelAction struct{}
[src/internal/common/type.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
CDCurrentPanelAction struct {
Location string
}
[src/internal/common/type.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
OpenPanelAction struct {
Location string
}
[src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
func NewMetadata(data [][2]string, filepath string, infoMsg string) Metadata {
return Metadata{
data: data,
filepath: filepath,
infoMsg: infoMsg,
}
}
[src/internal/ui/metadata/metadata.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
func GetMetadata(filePath string, metadataFocussed bool, et *exiftool.Exiftool) Metadata {
meta := getMetaDataUnsorted(filePath, metadataFocussed, et)
sortMetadata(meta.data)
return meta
}
[src/internal/ui/sidebar/type.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
Model struct {
directories []directory
renderIndex int
cursor int
rename textinput.Model
renaming bool
searchBar textinput.Model
pinnedMgr *PinnedManager
}
[src/internal/ui/zoxide/type.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
Model struct {
// Configuration
headline string
zClient *zoxidelib.Client
// State
open bool
justOpened bool // Flag to ignore the opening keystroke
textInput textinput.Model
results []zoxidelib.Result
cursor int // Index of currently selected result for keyboard navigation
renderIndex int // Index of first visible result in scrollable list
// Dimensions - Exported, since model will be dynamically adjusting them
width int
// Height is dynamically adjusted based on content
maxHeight int
// Request tracking for async queries
reqCnt int
}
[src/internal/ui/zoxide/type.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
UpdateMsg struct {
query string
results []zoxidelib.Result
reqID int
}
[src/config/fixed_variable.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
func SetLastDir(path string) {
LastDir = path
}
[src/config/fixed_variable.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
LastDirFile = filepath.Join(SuperFileStateDir, "lastdir")
[src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
DefaultCommandTimeout = 5000 * time.Millisecond
[src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
MinimumHeight = 24
[src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
MinimumWidth = 60
[src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go] // Line ranges provided in snippets
InOperation ProcessState = iota
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/model_render.go:329-341
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T14:11:21.380Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer help menu rendering optimizations and other technical debt improvements to separate GitHub issues when the current PR scope has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking performance improvements for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When lazysegtree says a review is "inaccurate and pre-existing issues. Not much useful," it means I should focus specifically on bugs or problems introduced by the current PR changes, not architectural concerns or code quality issues that were already present. The refactoring work in superfile PRs is generally well-implemented and should be evaluated on whether the specific changes work correctly, not on broader codebase architecture.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/model_msg.go:58-62
Timestamp: 2025-09-16T07:17:07.854Z
Learning: lazysegtree correctly identified a race condition bug in DeleteOperationMsg.ApplyToModel() where asynchronous delete operations unconditionally reset the current file selection even if the user has selected different files after starting the delete operation, leading to unexpected selection clearing.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 985
File: src/internal/model.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T01:49:30.040Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers maintaining code correctness through proper design and invariants rather than adding defensive bounds checks at every slice access point, viewing such defensive programming as "duct taping" that can mask actual bugs instead of fixing them at their source.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:149-149
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T13:29:11.771Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep PR scope focused on the primary objectives and considers pre-existing technical debt issues as out of scope for migration/refactoring PRs, preferring to defer such issues to separate GitHub issues rather than expanding the current PR scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea.Cmd), always check for incomplete refactoring where some call sites still use the old pattern while others use the new pattern, as this often leads to compilation errors and architectural inconsistencies.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When reviewing PRs, especially large refactoring ones, focus specifically on issues introduced by the changes rather than flagging pre-existing architectural problems or code smells that were already present before the PR. Distinguish between new bugs versus existing technical debt.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.721Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go:7-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T14:49:31.221Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep test-only code simple without adding production-level concerns like goroutine synchronization, cancellation contexts, or complex lifecycle management, even when such patterns might prevent potential issues, since the complexity isn't justified for test utilities.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@coderabbitai Check again. I have changed a few things.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Full diff for src/internal/model.go ==="
git diff main HEAD -- src/internal/model.go
echo -e "\n=== Current getFilePanelItems and helper methods ==="
ast-grep --pattern $'func (m *model) getFilePanelItems() {
$$$
}'
echo -e "\n=== shouldSkipPanelUpdate method ==="
ast-grep --pattern $'func (m *model) shouldSkipPanelUpdate($$$) $_ {
$$$
}'
echo -e "\n=== needsReRender method ==="
ast-grep --pattern $'func (panel *filePanel) needsReRender() bool {
$$$
}'
echo -e "\n=== getElementsForPanel method ==="
ast-grep --pattern $'func (m *model) getElementsForPanel($$$) $_ {
$$$
}'
echo -e "\n=== applyTargetFileCursor method ==="
ast-grep --pattern $'func (panel *filePanel) applyTargetFileCursor() {
$$$
}'
echo -e "\n=== scrollToCursor implementation in handle_panel_up_down.go ==="
ast-grep --pattern $'func (panel *filePanel) scrollToCursor($$$) {
$$$
}'
echo -e "\n=== Check defaultFilePanel in type_utils.go ==="
ast-grep --pattern $'func defaultFilePanel($$$) filePanel {
$$$
}'
echo -e "\n=== Check test file ==="
rg -A 50 "TestInitialFilePathPositionsCursorWindow" src/internal/model_test.go
Length of output: 12848
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify shouldSkipPanelUpdate exists and get its full implementation
echo "=== Searching for shouldSkipPanelUpdate in model.go ==="
rg -A 15 "func \(m \*model\) shouldSkipPanelUpdate" src/internal/model.go
echo -e "\n=== Verify the full flow in getFilePanelItems ==="
sed -n '698,720p' src/internal/model.go
Length of output: 1440
@lazysegtree, Excellent improvements! The refactoring is now even cleaner. Everything looks perfect ✓
What Changed Since Last Review
You've made a key architectural improvement:
applyTargetFileCursor() now has perfect single responsibility:
func (panel *filePanel) applyTargetFileCursor() {
for idx, el := range panel.element {
if el.name == panel.targetFile {
panel.cursor = idx // Only sets cursor
}
}
panel.targetFile = ""
}- ✓ Only sets cursor position
- ✓ No render window manipulation
- ✓ No unnecessary
elsestatement (fixed) - ✓ Cleaner separation of concerns
Render adjustment delegated to scrollToCursor():
// Called unconditionally for ALL panels
filePanel.scrollToCursor(m.mainPanelHeight)- ✓ Handles bounds checking
- ✓ Adjusts render window when cursor moves outside visible area
- ✓ Centralizes all scroll logic in one place
This is actually better than what I originally suggested. The separation between "setting cursor" and "adjusting viewport" is now crystal clear.
Complete Flow Verification
1. Feature logic:
- File path detected in
defaultFilePanel()✓ targetFilestored,locationset to parent ✓- Elements loaded, cursor positioned ✓
- Render window adjusted ✓
targetFilecleared to prevent reprocessing ✓
2. Helper methods:
shouldSkipPanelUpdate()- throttling preserved ✓needsReRender()- directory change detection ✓getElementsForPanel()- search filtering ✓applyTargetFileCursor()- cursor positioning ✓scrollToCursor()- viewport adjustment ✓
3. Edge cases:
- Non-existent file: cursor stays 0, cleared ✓
- Empty directory: bounds handled ✓
- Symlinks:
os.Stat()follows them ✓ - Multiple panels: each handled correctly ✓
4. Test coverage:
TestInitialFilePathPositionsCursorWindowvalidates cursor and render positioning ✓
Verdict
No bugs detected. The refactoring is well-executed with excellent code organization. The hover-to-file feature is correctly integrated and all original logic is preserved.
🐰✨
/> />
(•.•)
/>🔍 Clean refactor!
🧬 Code Graph Analysis Results
[src/internal/common/type.go] (lines 5-7)
NoAction
[src/internal/common/type.go] (lines 9-10)
NoAction struct {
}
[src/internal/common/type.go] (lines 16-18)
ShellCommandAction struct {
Command string
}
[src/internal/common/type.go] (lines 26-26)
SplitPanelAction struct{}
[src/internal/common/type.go] (lines 32-34)
CDCurrentPanelAction struct {
Location string
}
[src/internal/common/type.go] (lines 40-42)
OpenPanelAction struct {
Location string
}
[src/internal/model_msg.go] (lines 13-16)
ModelUpdateMessage interface {
ApplyToModel(m *model) tea.Cmd
GetReqID() int
}
[src/internal/utils/file_utils.go] (lines 186-199)
func ResolveAbsPath(currentDir string, path string) string {
if !filepath.IsAbs(currentDir) {
slog.Warn("currentDir is not absolute", "currentDir", currentDir)
}
if strings.HasPrefix(path, "") {", xdg.Home, 1)
// We dont use variable.HomeDir here, as the util package cannot have dependency
// on variable package
path = strings.Replace(path, "
}
if !filepath.IsAbs(path) {
path = filepath.Join(currentDir, path)
}
return filepath.Clean(path)
}
[src/config/fixed_variable.go] (lines 52-52)
LastDirFile = filepath.Join(SuperFileStateDir, "lastdir")
[src/config/fixed_variable.go] (lines 82-84)
func SetLastDir(path string) {
LastDir = path
}
[src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go] (lines 12-12)
DefaultCommandTimeout = 5000 * time.Millisecond
[src/internal/ui/preview/model.go] (lines 43-50)
func New() Model {
return Model{
open: common.Config.DefaultOpenFilePreview,
imagePreviewer: filepreview.NewImagePreviewer(),
// TODO: This is an IO operation, move to async ?
batCmd: checkBatCmd(),
}
}
[src/internal/ui/sidebar/type.go] (lines 10-18)
Model struct {
directories []directory
renderIndex int
cursor int
rename textinput.Model
renaming bool
searchBar textinput.Model
pinnedMgr *PinnedManager
}
[src/internal/ui/zoxide/type.go] (lines 9-30)
Model struct {
// Configuration
headline string
zClient *zoxidelib.Client
// State
open bool
justOpened bool // Flag to ignore the opening keystroke
textInput textinput.Model
results []zoxidelib.Result
cursor int // Index of currently selected result for keyboard navigation
renderIndex int // Index of first visible result in scrollable list
// Dimensions - Exported, since model will be dynamically adjusting them
width int
// Height is dynamically adjusted based on content
maxHeight int
// Request tracking for async queries
reqCnt int
}
[src/internal/ui/processbar/process.go] (lines 40-40)
InOperation ProcessState = iota
[src/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go] (lines 3-3)
Cmd func() UpdateMsg
[src/internal/ui/processbar/process_update_msg.go] (lines 5-8)
UpdateMsg interface {
Apply(m *Model) (Cmd, error)
GetReqID() int
}
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When lazysegtree says a review is "inaccurate and pre-existing issues. Not much useful," it means I should focus specifically on bugs or problems introduced by the current PR changes, not architectural concerns or code quality issues that were already present. The refactoring work in superfile PRs is generally well-implemented and should be evaluated on whether the specific changes work correctly, not on broader codebase architecture.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea.Cmd), always check for incomplete refactoring where some call sites still use the old pattern while others use the new pattern, as this often leads to compilation errors and architectural inconsistencies.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1011
File: src/internal/handle_modal.go:145-203
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T13:56:33.955Z
Learning: lazysegtree identified that help menu navigation functions (helpMenuListUp and helpMenuListDown) in src/internal/handle_modal.go are too complicated, can be simplified, are similar to sidebar navigation but inconsistent, and lack unit tests. He prefers to track such technical debt in separate GitHub issues rather than addressing it in the current PR scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1081
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/directory_utils.go:103-112
Timestamp: 2025-09-20T01:40:50.076Z
Learning: lazysegtree identified code duplication between removeNotExistingDirectories and TogglePinnedDirectory functions in src/internal/ui/sidebar/directory_utils.go, specifically 6 lines of JSON marshaling and file writing logic. He prefers to track such duplication fixes in separate GitHub issues and suggests either extracting common util functions or creating a PinnedDir manager for centralized Read/Write operations to PinnedFile.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, the preview panel refactoring created duplicate ImagePreviewer instances (one in defaultModelConfig and another in preview.New()), which caused image preview crashes. The refactoring also renamed SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and moved global batCmd to per-instance batCmd initialization, all contributing to crashes during image preview and test failures.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.721Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/model_render.go:329-341
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T14:11:21.380Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer help menu rendering optimizations and other technical debt improvements to separate GitHub issues when the current PR scope has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking performance improvements for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 985
File: src/internal/model.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T01:49:30.040Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers maintaining code correctness through proper design and invariants rather than adding defensive bounds checks at every slice access point, viewing such defensive programming as "duct taping" that can mask actual bugs instead of fixing them at their source.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go:7-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T14:49:31.221Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep test-only code simple without adding production-level concerns like goroutine synchronization, cancellation contexts, or complex lifecycle management, even when such patterns might prevent potential issues, since the complexity isn't justified for test utilities.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:149-149
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T13:29:11.771Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep PR scope focused on the primary objectives and considers pre-existing technical debt issues as out of scope for migration/refactoring PRs, preferring to defer such issues to separate GitHub issues rather than expanding the current PR scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/internal/model.go (1)
698-775: Panel update refactor preserves behavior and cleanly adds target-file cursoring
shouldSkipPanelUpdate,focusPanelNeedsReRender, andgetElementsForPanelfaithfully encode the previous throttling + reload rules, just factored into helpers. Non-focused panels are still throttled, and focused panels still re-render when their directory changes or enough time has passed.applyTargetFileCursorcorrectly:
- No-ops when
targetFile == "".- For a configured
targetFile, finds the first matching element byel.name, setscursorto that index, nudgesrendertoidx-1whenidx > 0, then clearstargetFileso this runs only once.- Degrades safely when the file isn’t present (cursor left as-is, token cleared).
This integrates the new “start in a directory but hover to a specific file” behavior without regressing existing refresh logic. If you want to reduce the nesting depth CodeScene flagged, you can drop the
elseblock inapplyTargetFileCursorand unindent the loop after the earlyreturn; semantics stay identical.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/internal/type_utils.go (1)
3-83: Path→panel+targetFile handling in defaultFilePanel looks correct
filePanelSlice(paths)simply forwards each path intodefaultFilePanel, preserving the “first panel focused” invariant.defaultFilePanel:
- Leaves directory paths unchanged (
location == path,targetFile == "").- For file paths, uses
os.Statto detect non-directories, then setslocationto the parent dir andtargetFiletofilepath.Base(path)– exactly whatapplyTargetFileCursorneeds.- On
os.Staterror (e.g. non-existent path), it behaves like the old code and just keepspanelPathas-is, avoiding extra complexity.This cleanly enables “open at file, show parent directory, cursor on that file” without regressing directory-only flows.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
src/cmd/main.go(2 hunks)src/internal/config_function.go(3 hunks)src/internal/default_config.go(1 hunks)src/internal/model.go(2 hunks)src/internal/model_test.go(2 hunks)src/internal/type.go(1 hunks)src/internal/type_utils.go(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/internal/type.go
- src/internal/config_function.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (17)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1040
File: src/internal/function.go:58-58
Timestamp: 2025-09-05T08:04:14.324Z
Learning: lazysegtree asked about "dual-panel functionality" and "secondary focus" in the superfile codebase. The system actually supports multiple file panels (not specifically dual-panel), where users can create/close panels and navigate between them. The old `secondFocus` state was used to mark non-active panels when multiple panels were open, not for a specific dual-panel feature. The focus states were: noneFocus (no file panel focused), focus (active panel), and secondFocus (inactive panels).
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.721Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/model_render.go:329-341
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T14:11:21.380Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer help menu rendering optimizations and other technical debt improvements to separate GitHub issues when the current PR scope has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking performance improvements for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 985
File: src/internal/model.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T01:49:30.040Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers maintaining code correctness through proper design and invariants rather than adding defensive bounds checks at every slice access point, viewing such defensive programming as "duct taping" that can mask actual bugs instead of fixing them at their source.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go:7-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T14:49:31.221Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep test-only code simple without adding production-level concerns like goroutine synchronization, cancellation contexts, or complex lifecycle management, even when such patterns might prevent potential issues, since the complexity isn't justified for test utilities.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:149-149
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T13:29:11.771Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep PR scope focused on the primary objectives and considers pre-existing technical debt issues as out of scope for migration/refactoring PRs, preferring to defer such issues to separate GitHub issues rather than expanding the current PR scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
📚 Learning: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, the preview panel refactoring created duplicate ImagePreviewer instances (one in defaultModelConfig and another in preview.New()), which caused image preview crashes. The refactoring also renamed SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and moved global batCmd to per-instance batCmd initialization, all contributing to crashes during image preview and test failures.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.gosrc/internal/model_test.go
📚 Learning: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea.Cmd), always check for incomplete refactoring where some call sites still use the old pattern while others use the new pattern, as this often leads to compilation errors and architectural inconsistencies.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When reviewing PRs, especially large refactoring ones, focus specifically on issues introduced by the changes rather than flagging pre-existing architectural problems or code smells that were already present before the PR. Distinguish between new bugs versus existing technical debt.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When lazysegtree says a review is "inaccurate and pre-existing issues. Not much useful," it means I should focus specifically on bugs or problems introduced by the current PR changes, not architectural concerns or code quality issues that were already present. The refactoring work in superfile PRs is generally well-implemented and should be evaluated on whether the specific changes work correctly, not on broader codebase architecture.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-29T13:56:33.955Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1011
File: src/internal/handle_modal.go:145-203
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T13:56:33.955Z
Learning: lazysegtree identified that help menu navigation functions (helpMenuListUp and helpMenuListDown) in src/internal/handle_modal.go are too complicated, can be simplified, are similar to sidebar navigation but inconsistent, and lack unit tests. He prefers to track such technical debt in separate GitHub issues rather than addressing it in the current PR scope.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-09-04T07:24:30.872Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1041
File: src/internal/default_config.go:38-38
Timestamp: 2025-09-04T07:24:30.872Z
Learning: In the superfile codebase, the main model struct has a zClient field for zoxide directory tracking, and the trackDirectoryWithZoxide function in model.go checks if m.zClient is nil before proceeding. When reviewing model initialization functions like defaultModelConfig, ensure all struct fields are properly assigned, especially external service clients like zClient that enable core functionality.
Applied to files:
src/internal/default_config.go
📚 Learning: 2025-09-09T14:23:14.164Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/ui/rendering/truncate.go:6-6
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T14:23:14.164Z
Learning: The truncate test failure in src/internal/ui/rendering/truncate_test.go during the ANSI package migration from experimental to stable was caused by a truncation bug in the experimental package. The experimental package incorrectly truncated strings even when input length equaled maxWidth (e.g., "1234" with maxWidth=4 became "1..."), while the stable package correctly only truncates when input exceeds maxWidth. The test expectation was based on the buggy behavior and needs to be corrected.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model_test.go
📚 Learning: 2025-09-20T01:40:50.076Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1081
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/directory_utils.go:103-112
Timestamp: 2025-09-20T01:40:50.076Z
Learning: lazysegtree identified code duplication between removeNotExistingDirectories and TogglePinnedDirectory functions in src/internal/ui/sidebar/directory_utils.go, specifically 6 lines of JSON marshaling and file writing logic. He prefers to track such duplication fixes in separate GitHub issues and suggests either extracting common util functions or creating a PinnedDir manager for centralized Read/Write operations to PinnedFile.
Applied to files:
src/internal/type_utils.go
📚 Learning: 2025-06-24T03:17:11.949Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 881
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:104-104
Timestamp: 2025-06-24T03:17:11.949Z
Learning: In superfile's LoadTomlFile function, error handling should follow this pattern: use PrintfAndExit for critical errors that prevent application functionality (config corruption, file system failures during fixing), and use fmt.Println with errorPrefix for non-critical errors that users should see but can continue from (missing fields when not fixing, cleanup warnings).
Applied to files:
src/internal/type_utils.go
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
src/cmd/main.go (1)
src/internal/model.go (1)
InitialModel(41-44)
src/internal/model_test.go (3)
src/internal/test_utils_teaprog.go (1)
NewTestTeaProgWithEventLoop(33-39)src/internal/test_utils.go (1)
TeaUpdate(61-64)src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go (1)
MinimumWidth(25-25)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/cmd/main.go (1)
121-135: CLI firstPanelPaths wiring matches new InitialModel APIThe switch from
firstFilePanelDirstofirstPanelPathshere is consistent: defaulting to[]string{""}and then usingc.Args().Slice()preserves prior behavior, while correctly feeding the newInitialModel(firstPanelPaths, firstUse)signature. No functional regressions introduced in this entry path.src/internal/default_config.go (1)
22-44: defaultModelConfig correctly adopts firstPanelPaths + new slice helperRenaming the parameter to
firstPanelPathsand passing it intofilePanelSlice(firstPanelPaths)lines up with the updated initialization flow (InitialModelandfilePanelSlice) without altering behavior of the rest of the model construction, includingzClientwiring.src/internal/model_test.go (1)
99-167: New cursor-positioning tests align with targetFile behaviorBoth tests accurately target the new behavior:
TestInitialFilePathPositionsCursorvalidates that initializing with directory + file path yields two panels where the second panel’s selected item is the passed file.TestInitialFilePathPositionsCursorWindowchecks that when starting from a file path, the panel opens on the parent directory, the cursor lands onfile08.txt, and that item lies within the computed visible window after aWindowSizeMsg.They exercise the new
targetFile+applyTargetFileCursorflow end-to-end and look robust given existing helpers likeTeaUpdateandNewTestTeaProgWithEventLoop.src/internal/model.go (1)
41-44: InitialModel rename + wiring to defaultModelConfig is consistent
InitialModelnow takesfirstPanelPathsand threads it throughinitialConfiganddefaultModelConfigwithout changing any other initialization behavior. This matches the rest of the refactor and keeps the public entry point coherent with the new path semantics.
lazysegtree
force-pushed
the
allow-hover-to-file
branch
from
638d821 to
83d88f3
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
lazysegtree
force-pushed
the
allow-hover-to-file
branch
from
83d88f3 to
dc58340
Compare
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/internal/model.go (1)
763-770: Consider adding early break for efficiency.The function correctly positions the cursor to the target file, but continues iterating after finding a match. Adding a
breakstatement would improve efficiency, especially with large directories.Apply this diff:
func (panel *filePanel) applyTargetFileCursor() { for idx, el := range panel.element { if el.name == panel.targetFile { panel.cursor = idx + break } } panel.targetFile = "" }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
src/cmd/main.go(2 hunks)src/internal/config_function.go(3 hunks)src/internal/default_config.go(1 hunks)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go(1 hunks)src/internal/model.go(2 hunks)src/internal/model_test.go(2 hunks)src/internal/type.go(1 hunks)src/internal/type_utils.go(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- src/cmd/main.go
- src/internal/default_config.go
- src/internal/type.go
- src/internal/config_function.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (18)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1040
File: src/internal/function.go:58-58
Timestamp: 2025-09-05T08:04:14.324Z
Learning: lazysegtree asked about "dual-panel functionality" and "secondary focus" in the superfile codebase. The system actually supports multiple file panels (not specifically dual-panel), where users can create/close panels and navigate between them. The old `secondFocus` state was used to mark non-active panels when multiple panels were open, not for a specific dual-panel feature. The focus states were: noneFocus (no file panel focused), focus (active panel), and secondFocus (inactive panels).
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.721Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/model_render.go:329-341
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T14:11:21.380Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer help menu rendering optimizations and other technical debt improvements to separate GitHub issues when the current PR scope has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking performance improvements for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 985
File: src/internal/model.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T01:49:30.040Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers maintaining code correctness through proper design and invariants rather than adding defensive bounds checks at every slice access point, viewing such defensive programming as "duct taping" that can mask actual bugs instead of fixing them at their source.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go:7-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T14:49:31.221Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep test-only code simple without adding production-level concerns like goroutine synchronization, cancellation contexts, or complex lifecycle management, even when such patterns might prevent potential issues, since the complexity isn't justified for test utilities.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:149-149
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T13:29:11.771Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep PR scope focused on the primary objectives and considers pre-existing technical debt issues as out of scope for migration/refactoring PRs, preferring to defer such issues to separate GitHub issues rather than expanding the current PR scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
📚 Learning: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, the preview panel refactoring created duplicate ImagePreviewer instances (one in defaultModelConfig and another in preview.New()), which caused image preview crashes. The refactoring also renamed SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and moved global batCmd to per-instance batCmd initialization, all contributing to crashes during image preview and test failures.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea.Cmd), always check for incomplete refactoring where some call sites still use the old pattern while others use the new pattern, as this often leads to compilation errors and architectural inconsistencies.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When reviewing PRs, especially large refactoring ones, focus specifically on issues introduced by the changes rather than flagging pre-existing architectural problems or code smells that were already present before the PR. Distinguish between new bugs versus existing technical debt.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When lazysegtree says a review is "inaccurate and pre-existing issues. Not much useful," it means I should focus specifically on bugs or problems introduced by the current PR changes, not architectural concerns or code quality issues that were already present. The refactoring work in superfile PRs is generally well-implemented and should be evaluated on whether the specific changes work correctly, not on broader codebase architecture.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-29T13:56:33.955Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1011
File: src/internal/handle_modal.go:145-203
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T13:56:33.955Z
Learning: lazysegtree identified that help menu navigation functions (helpMenuListUp and helpMenuListDown) in src/internal/handle_modal.go are too complicated, can be simplified, are similar to sidebar navigation but inconsistent, and lack unit tests. He prefers to track such technical debt in separate GitHub issues rather than addressing it in the current PR scope.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.gosrc/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go
📚 Learning: 2025-09-09T14:23:14.164Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/ui/rendering/truncate.go:6-6
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T14:23:14.164Z
Learning: The truncate test failure in src/internal/ui/rendering/truncate_test.go during the ANSI package migration from experimental to stable was caused by a truncation bug in the experimental package. The experimental package incorrectly truncated strings even when input length equaled maxWidth (e.g., "1234" with maxWidth=4 became "1..."), while the stable package correctly only truncates when input exceeds maxWidth. The test expectation was based on the buggy behavior and needs to be corrected.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model_test.go
📚 Learning: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Applied to files:
src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go
📚 Learning: 2025-09-20T01:40:50.076Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1081
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/directory_utils.go:103-112
Timestamp: 2025-09-20T01:40:50.076Z
Learning: lazysegtree identified code duplication between removeNotExistingDirectories and TogglePinnedDirectory functions in src/internal/ui/sidebar/directory_utils.go, specifically 6 lines of JSON marshaling and file writing logic. He prefers to track such duplication fixes in separate GitHub issues and suggests either extracting common util functions or creating a PinnedDir manager for centralized Read/Write operations to PinnedFile.
Applied to files:
src/internal/type_utils.go
📚 Learning: 2025-06-24T03:17:11.949Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 881
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:104-104
Timestamp: 2025-06-24T03:17:11.949Z
Learning: In superfile's LoadTomlFile function, error handling should follow this pattern: use PrintfAndExit for critical errors that prevent application functionality (config corruption, file system failures during fixing), and use fmt.Println with errorPrefix for non-critical errors that users should see but can continue from (missing fields when not fixing, cleanup warnings).
Applied to files:
src/internal/type_utils.go
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
src/internal/model.go (2)
src/internal/model_render.go (1)
panel(111-151)src/internal/model_navigation_test.go (1)
TestFilePanelNavigation(15-149)
src/internal/model_test.go (3)
src/internal/utils/test_utils.go (2)
SetupDirectories(36-45)SetupFiles(55-57)src/internal/test_utils.go (2)
TeaUpdate(61-64)navigateToTargetDir(207-214)src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go (1)
MinimumWidth(25-25)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go (1)
5-18: LGTM! Solid scroll-to-cursor implementation.The bounds validation and render window adjustment logic is correct. The method properly handles edge cases and integrates cleanly with the cursor positioning feature.
src/internal/model_test.go (1)
100-133: Excellent test coverage for the new feature.The test thoroughly validates initial file path positioning, cursor placement, and render window behavior. The assertions confirm that the scroll logic correctly positions both visible and out-of-viewport target files.
src/internal/type_utils.go (2)
41-49: LGTM! Clean parameter rename.The rename from
dirtopathsaccurately reflects that the function now handles both file and directory paths.
51-84: Excellent file path handling implementation.The logic correctly detects files vs. directories, extracts the filename and parent directory, and stores the target file for cursor positioning. The use of
os.Statproperly handles symlinks, and the error fallback safely treats unknown paths as directories.src/internal/model.go (5)
41-44: LGTM! Consistent parameter rename.The rename from
firstFilePanelDirstofirstPanelPathsaligns with the new capability to accept file paths.
724-739: Well-extracted throttling logic.The helper cleanly separates the decision logic for skipping panel updates, maintaining the original throttling behavior while improving readability. The non-focused panel throttling (3s) and focused panel dynamic throttling based on element count are both correctly implemented.
742-747: LGTM! Clean directory change detection.The helper correctly identifies when the panel's elements are stale by comparing the first element's parent directory with the current panel location.
750-760: LGTM! Clean element loading logic.The helper centralizes element retrieval with proper handling of search filtering, improving code organization.
698-721: Excellent refactoring of panel update logic.The extracted helpers improve readability while preserving the original behavior. The integration correctly sequences element loading, target file cursor positioning, and scroll adjustment. The new modular structure makes the code easier to understand and maintain.
lazysegtree
force-pushed
the
allow-hover-to-file
branch
from
dc58340 to
dce4613
Compare
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/internal/model.go (1)
41-44: File‑path initialization + panel update helpers look consistent and correct
- Renaming the public entry to
InitialModel(firstPanelPaths []string, ...)and threadingfirstPanelPathsthroughinitialConfig/defaultModelConfigmatches the new “file or directory path” semantics and aligns with the new test.getFilePanelItemsnow:
- uses
shouldSkipPanelUpdateto throttle non‑focused panels and small focused panels similarly to the old inline logic,- centralizes element loading in
getElementsForPanel(search vs full listing),- applies
targetFileexactly once per panel and then clears it,- and calls
scrollToCursor(m.mainPanelHeight)so the targeted file is brought into view, which matches the expectations inTestInitialFilePathPositionsCursorWindow.needsReRendercorrectly forces a refresh when the focus panel’s directory has changed or is empty, avoiding stale listings on directory changes.One tiny optional micro‑nit: in
applyTargetFileCursor, you couldbreakafter settingpanel.cursorsincenameshould be unique within a directory:func (panel *filePanel) applyTargetFileCursor() { - for idx, el := range panel.element { - if el.name == panel.targetFile { - panel.cursor = idx - } - } + for idx, el := range panel.element { + if el.name == panel.targetFile { + panel.cursor = idx + break + } + } panel.targetFile = "" }Purely optional; current behavior is already correct.
Also applies to: 698-769
src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go (1)
3-22: scrollToCursor correctly keeps the cursor in view; debug log could be lighterFunctionally this helper looks good:
- It guards against invalid
cursorvalues by resettingcursorandrenderto 0 and returning early.- It uses
panelElementHeight(mainPanelHeight)to compute the visible window size and adjustsrenderso that:
- if the cursor moves above the window,
renderis shifted up, and- if it moves below,
renderis shifted down,
which aligns with howrenderFileEntriesslicespanel.element.That matches how you use it after
applyTargetFileCursor, ensuring the initially‑targeted file is visible.Minor/optional: the debug log currently dumps
panel.element, which can be large and noisy. If you find logs too verbose, consider logging only lengths/indices instead:- slog.Debug("scrollToCursor", "loc", panel.location, "elem", panel.element, - "cursor", panel.cursor, "render", panel.render, "h", mainPanelHeight) + slog.Debug("scrollToCursor", "loc", panel.location, "elemLen", len(panel.element), + "cursor", panel.cursor, "render", panel.render, "h", mainPanelHeight)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
src/cmd/main.go(2 hunks)src/internal/config_function.go(3 hunks)src/internal/default_config.go(1 hunks)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go(1 hunks)src/internal/model.go(2 hunks)src/internal/model_test.go(2 hunks)src/internal/type.go(1 hunks)src/internal/type_utils.go(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- src/internal/default_config.go
- src/cmd/main.go
- src/internal/type.go
- src/internal/config_function.go
- src/internal/type_utils.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (16)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1040
File: src/internal/function.go:58-58
Timestamp: 2025-09-05T08:04:14.324Z
Learning: lazysegtree asked about "dual-panel functionality" and "secondary focus" in the superfile codebase. The system actually supports multiple file panels (not specifically dual-panel), where users can create/close panels and navigate between them. The old `secondFocus` state was used to mark non-active panels when multiple panels were open, not for a specific dual-panel feature. The focus states were: noneFocus (no file panel focused), focus (active panel), and secondFocus (inactive panels).
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.721Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/model_render.go:329-341
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T14:11:21.380Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer help menu rendering optimizations and other technical debt improvements to separate GitHub issues when the current PR scope has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking performance improvements for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 985
File: src/internal/model.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T01:49:30.040Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers maintaining code correctness through proper design and invariants rather than adding defensive bounds checks at every slice access point, viewing such defensive programming as "duct taping" that can mask actual bugs instead of fixing them at their source.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go:7-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T14:49:31.221Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep test-only code simple without adding production-level concerns like goroutine synchronization, cancellation contexts, or complex lifecycle management, even when such patterns might prevent potential issues, since the complexity isn't justified for test utilities.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:149-149
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T13:29:11.771Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep PR scope focused on the primary objectives and considers pre-existing technical debt issues as out of scope for migration/refactoring PRs, preferring to defer such issues to separate GitHub issues rather than expanding the current PR scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
📚 Learning: 2025-09-09T14:23:14.164Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/ui/rendering/truncate.go:6-6
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T14:23:14.164Z
Learning: The truncate test failure in src/internal/ui/rendering/truncate_test.go during the ANSI package migration from experimental to stable was caused by a truncation bug in the experimental package. The experimental package incorrectly truncated strings even when input length equaled maxWidth (e.g., "1234" with maxWidth=4 became "1..."), while the stable package correctly only truncates when input exceeds maxWidth. The test expectation was based on the buggy behavior and needs to be corrected.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model_test.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, the preview panel refactoring created duplicate ImagePreviewer instances (one in defaultModelConfig and another in preview.New()), which caused image preview crashes. The refactoring also renamed SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and moved global batCmd to per-instance batCmd initialization, all contributing to crashes during image preview and test failures.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea.Cmd), always check for incomplete refactoring where some call sites still use the old pattern while others use the new pattern, as this often leads to compilation errors and architectural inconsistencies.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When reviewing PRs, especially large refactoring ones, focus specifically on issues introduced by the changes rather than flagging pre-existing architectural problems or code smells that were already present before the PR. Distinguish between new bugs versus existing technical debt.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When lazysegtree says a review is "inaccurate and pre-existing issues. Not much useful," it means I should focus specifically on bugs or problems introduced by the current PR changes, not architectural concerns or code quality issues that were already present. The refactoring work in superfile PRs is generally well-implemented and should be evaluated on whether the specific changes work correctly, not on broader codebase architecture.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-29T13:56:33.955Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1011
File: src/internal/handle_modal.go:145-203
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T13:56:33.955Z
Learning: lazysegtree identified that help menu navigation functions (helpMenuListUp and helpMenuListDown) in src/internal/handle_modal.go are too complicated, can be simplified, are similar to sidebar navigation but inconsistent, and lack unit tests. He prefers to track such technical debt in separate GitHub issues rather than addressing it in the current PR scope.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.gosrc/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.gosrc/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go
📚 Learning: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Applied to files:
src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go (2)
src/internal/file_panel.go (1)
panel(96-108)src/internal/model_render.go (1)
panel(111-151)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Build and Test (ubuntu-latest)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/internal/model_test.go (2)
10-133: New hover-to-file startup test correctly exercises cursor and window behaviorThis test nicely builds a realistic directory with multiple files, initializes the model with a mix of directory and file paths, sends a
WindowSizeMsg, and asserts:
- the expected number of panels,
- that panels 1 and 2 focus
file2andfile7respectively,- and that
cursor/renderindices match the intended viewport.This gives good coverage of the new
firstPanelPaths/targetFile+scrollToCursorbehavior end‑to‑end.
108-117: This code is compatible with the project's Go versionThe repository targets Go 1.25.0 (as declared in go.mod), which fully supports the
for i := range 10syntax. This integer range loop feature has been available since Go 1.22 and is the idiomatic approach in modern Go. No changes are needed.
lazysegtree
force-pushed
the
allow-hover-to-file
branch
from
dce4613 to
5547665
Compare
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/internal/config_function.go (1)
94-118:updateFirstFilePanelPathscorrectly allows file paths while preserving fallbacks
- Empty entries are mapped to
common.Config.DefaultDirectorybefore resolution.utils.ResolveAbsPath(cwd, firstPanelPaths[i])handles~and relative paths correctly.- The
os.Statcheck now only cares about existence, not directory-ness, which is the key change that lets existing file paths pass through todefaultFilePanel(where they become “parent dir + targetFile”).- For non-existent paths:
- It tries zoxide (
attemptZoxideForInitPath) when enabled, enforcing that returned paths exist and are directories.- Falls back to
variable.HomeDirif zoxide is disabled or fails.Only minor nit: the slog error message still says
"firstFilePanelDir", which is slightly outdated now that we’re dealing with generic paths, but it’s purely cosmetic.- slog.Error("cannot get stats for firstFilePanelDir", "error", err) + slog.Error("cannot get stats for initial panel path", "path", originalPath, "error", err)src/internal/model.go (1)
760-768:applyTargetFileCursordoes the right thing; consider breaking on first matchThe method:
- Scans
panel.elementonce to find entries whosenameequalspanel.targetFile.- Sets
cursorto the matching index and then clearstargetFileto avoid repeated scans.Functionally this satisfies the “hover to file” requirement. The only small refinement you might consider is breaking after the first match to avoid surprising behavior when multiple items share the same basename and to save a few iterations in very large dirs:
func (panel *filePanel) applyTargetFileCursor() { - for idx, el := range panel.element { - if el.name == panel.targetFile { - panel.cursor = idx - } - } + for idx, el := range panel.element { + if el.name == panel.targetFile { + panel.cursor = idx + break + } + } panel.targetFile = "" }Not required for correctness, but slightly clearer and more predictable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
src/cmd/main.go(2 hunks)src/internal/config_function.go(3 hunks)src/internal/default_config.go(1 hunks)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go(1 hunks)src/internal/model.go(2 hunks)src/internal/model_navigation_test.go(0 hunks)src/internal/model_test.go(2 hunks)src/internal/type.go(1 hunks)src/internal/type_utils.go(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/internal/model_navigation_test.go
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/internal/default_config.go
- src/internal/type.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (18)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1040
File: src/internal/function.go:58-58
Timestamp: 2025-09-05T08:04:14.324Z
Learning: lazysegtree asked about "dual-panel functionality" and "secondary focus" in the superfile codebase. The system actually supports multiple file panels (not specifically dual-panel), where users can create/close panels and navigate between them. The old `secondFocus` state was used to mark non-active panels when multiple panels were open, not for a specific dual-panel feature. The focus states were: noneFocus (no file panel focused), focus (active panel), and secondFocus (inactive panels).
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.721Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/model_render.go:329-341
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T14:11:21.380Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer help menu rendering optimizations and other technical debt improvements to separate GitHub issues when the current PR scope has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking performance improvements for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 985
File: src/internal/model.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T01:49:30.040Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers maintaining code correctness through proper design and invariants rather than adding defensive bounds checks at every slice access point, viewing such defensive programming as "duct taping" that can mask actual bugs instead of fixing them at their source.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go:7-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T14:49:31.221Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep test-only code simple without adding production-level concerns like goroutine synchronization, cancellation contexts, or complex lifecycle management, even when such patterns might prevent potential issues, since the complexity isn't justified for test utilities.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:149-149
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T13:29:11.771Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep PR scope focused on the primary objectives and considers pre-existing technical debt issues as out of scope for migration/refactoring PRs, preferring to defer such issues to separate GitHub issues rather than expanding the current PR scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
📚 Learning: 2025-09-20T01:40:50.076Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1081
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/directory_utils.go:103-112
Timestamp: 2025-09-20T01:40:50.076Z
Learning: lazysegtree identified code duplication between removeNotExistingDirectories and TogglePinnedDirectory functions in src/internal/ui/sidebar/directory_utils.go, specifically 6 lines of JSON marshaling and file writing logic. He prefers to track such duplication fixes in separate GitHub issues and suggests either extracting common util functions or creating a PinnedDir manager for centralized Read/Write operations to PinnedFile.
Applied to files:
src/internal/type_utils.gosrc/internal/config_function.go
📚 Learning: 2025-06-24T03:17:11.949Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 881
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:104-104
Timestamp: 2025-06-24T03:17:11.949Z
Learning: In superfile's LoadTomlFile function, error handling should follow this pattern: use PrintfAndExit for critical errors that prevent application functionality (config corruption, file system failures during fixing), and use fmt.Println with errorPrefix for non-critical errors that users should see but can continue from (missing fields when not fixing, cleanup warnings).
Applied to files:
src/internal/type_utils.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Applied to files:
src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.gosrc/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Applied to files:
src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go
📚 Learning: 2025-09-09T14:23:14.164Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/ui/rendering/truncate.go:6-6
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T14:23:14.164Z
Learning: The truncate test failure in src/internal/ui/rendering/truncate_test.go during the ANSI package migration from experimental to stable was caused by a truncation bug in the experimental package. The experimental package incorrectly truncated strings even when input length equaled maxWidth (e.g., "1234" with maxWidth=4 became "1..."), while the stable package correctly only truncates when input exceeds maxWidth. The test expectation was based on the buggy behavior and needs to be corrected.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model_test.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, the preview panel refactoring created duplicate ImagePreviewer instances (one in defaultModelConfig and another in preview.New()), which caused image preview crashes. The refactoring also renamed SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and moved global batCmd to per-instance batCmd initialization, all contributing to crashes during image preview and test failures.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea.Cmd), always check for incomplete refactoring where some call sites still use the old pattern while others use the new pattern, as this often leads to compilation errors and architectural inconsistencies.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When reviewing PRs, especially large refactoring ones, focus specifically on issues introduced by the changes rather than flagging pre-existing architectural problems or code smells that were already present before the PR. Distinguish between new bugs versus existing technical debt.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When lazysegtree says a review is "inaccurate and pre-existing issues. Not much useful," it means I should focus specifically on bugs or problems introduced by the current PR changes, not architectural concerns or code quality issues that were already present. The refactoring work in superfile PRs is generally well-implemented and should be evaluated on whether the specific changes work correctly, not on broader codebase architecture.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-29T13:56:33.955Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1011
File: src/internal/handle_modal.go:145-203
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T13:56:33.955Z
Learning: lazysegtree identified that help menu navigation functions (helpMenuListUp and helpMenuListDown) in src/internal/handle_modal.go are too complicated, can be simplified, are similar to sidebar navigation but inconsistent, and lack unit tests. He prefers to track such technical debt in separate GitHub issues rather than addressing it in the current PR scope.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
🧬 Code graph analysis (4)
src/cmd/main.go (2)
src/internal/model.go (1)
InitialModel(41-44)src/internal/file_panel.go (1)
panel(44-90)
src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go (5)
src/internal/file_panel.go (1)
panel(96-108)src/internal/handle_panel_up_down_test.go (1)
Test_filePanelUpDown(9-127)src/internal/model_render.go (1)
panel(111-151)src/internal/handle_panel_navigation.go (1)
m(108-130)src/internal/handle_panel_movement.go (1)
panel(122-136)
src/internal/config_function.go (2)
src/internal/utils/file_utils.go (1)
ResolveAbsPath(186-199)src/config/fixed_variable.go (1)
HomeDir(33-33)
src/internal/model_test.go (3)
src/internal/utils/test_utils.go (2)
SetupDirectories(36-45)SetupFiles(55-57)src/internal/test_utils.go (1)
TeaUpdate(61-64)src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go (1)
MinimumWidth(25-25)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Build and Test (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (13)
src/cmd/main.go (1)
121-135: CLI args →firstPanelPathsflow looks correctInitializing
firstPanelPathswith[]string{""}and then overriding withc.Args().Slice()when present keeps the old behavior for “no args” while allowing arbitrary paths (files or dirs) to flow intoInitialModel. The rename tofirstPanelPathsmatches the rest of the refactor, and there’s no behavioral regression here.src/internal/handle_panel_up_down.go (1)
5-18:scrollToCursorcorrectly clamps cursor and keeps it visibleThe helper safely resets
cursor/renderwhen out of bounds and then usespanelElementHeight(mainPanelHeight)to adjustrenderso the cursor is always within[render, render+renderCount). This centralizes the “cursor in view” invariant that was previously missing and integrates cleanly with caller logic likegetFilePanelItems.src/internal/model_test.go (2)
10-11: Bubble Tea import for tests is appropriateImporting Bubble Tea as
teais consistent with production code usage and is needed fortea.WindowSizeMsgin the new test. No issues.
100-133: New test robustly validates initial file-path + scroll behavior
TestInitialFilePathPositionsCursorWindow:
- Builds a realistic dir with 10 files.
- Starts the model with
dir1plus two file paths, relying on the newfirstPanelPaths+targetFilebehavior.- Applies a
WindowSizeMsgto set heights and then asserts:
- 3 panels created.
- Panel[1] focused on
file2withcursor=2, render=0.- Panel[2] focused on
file7withcursor=7, render=3.This nicely exercises both
defaultFilePanel’s file→parent-dir mapping and theapplyTargetFileCursor+scrollToCursorpipeline. Assertions look correct and non-brittle.src/internal/type_utils.go (2)
3-10: New imports are minimal and justifiedAdding
osandpath/filepathis exactly what’s needed for file-vs-dir detection and basename/dirname extraction indefaultFilePanel, with no unnecessary dependencies.
41-83:defaultFilePanelcorrectly deriveslocationandtargetFilefrom paths
filePanelSlice(paths []string)now clearly communicates that inputs can be generic paths, not just dirs, and still focuses only the first panel.- In
defaultFilePanel:
- For existing files:
os.Stat+!IsDir()setstargetFiletoBase(path)andlocationtoDir(path)viapanelPath, which is exactly what’s needed for “start on this file in its parent dir”.- For existing dirs:
IsDir()keepslocationas the directory.- On stat error: it falls back to using
pathas-is and leavestargetFileempty. For startup, this is safe becauseupdateFirstFilePanelPathsalready guarantees the paths exist before reaching here.Field initialization (
targetFile,location,directoryRecords,searchBar, sort options) remains consistent with prior behavior aside from the new target-file handling. This is a clean, localized change.src/internal/config_function.go (2)
28-43:initialConfigparameter rename and usage are coherentSwitching
initialConfigto acceptfirstPanelPaths []stringand passing that toupdateFirstFilePanelPathsaligns the naming and semantics with the new “paths, not just dirs” behavior. The rest of the function’s responsibilities (logging, config loading, exiftool/zoxide init) remain unchanged.
83-92: UsingfirstPanelPathsfor logging is consistent with new semanticsThe debug log now uses
"start_paths"and logsfirstPanelPaths, which matches the new API and will be useful for diagnosing startup-path behavior with files.src/internal/model.go (5)
41-44:InitialModelnow cleanly threadsfirstPanelPathsthrough init
InitialModelnow takesfirstPanelPaths []string, passes them intoinitialConfigand then intodefaultModelConfig. This end‑to‑end rename keeps the public API and internal config flow consistent with the new path semantics, and the behavior remains the same except for the new “file path allowed” capability.
698-719: Panel update loop integrates target-file cursoring and scrolling correctlyIn
getFilePanelItems:
- You iterate panels by index but work with
*filePanel, ensuring in-place updates.shouldSkipPanelUpdatecentralizes throttling logic and is called before any expensive directory reads.- When not skipped:
filePanel.elementis refreshed viagetElementsForPanel, honoring the search bar and sort options.lastTimeGetElementis updated alongside.- If
targetFileis set (startup case),applyTargetFileCursorruns once to move the cursor.- Regardless of whether the panel updated this tick,
scrollToCursor(m.mainPanelHeight)is called, which:
- Clamps invalid cursor values to 0 and
- Adjusts
renderso the cursor remains visible.Resetting
m.updatedToggleDotFileafter the loop keeps the “force refresh after dotfile toggle” contract intact for the next cycle. Overall, this is a well-factored and behaviorally sound integration of the new feature.
721-737:shouldSkipPanelUpdatepreserves throttling while respecting focus and dotfile toggles
- Non-focused panels are throttled to at most once every 3 seconds, unless
m.updatedToggleDotFileis true, in which case they refresh immediately after a dotfile toggle. This avoids unnecessary I/O while keeping views consistent after config changes.- Focused panel:
focusPanel.needsReRender()detects directory changes by comparingfilepath.Dir(element[0].location)withpanel.location.- When no directory change is detected, a size-based throttle (len/100 seconds) limits refresh rate for large directories.
- For small dirs (
len < 100),reRenderTimeis zero, so the second condition never triggers and the focused panel always refreshes—matching expectations for fast interaction.The logic is a bit dense but functionally correct and maintains prior behavior while making the conditions explicit.
739-745:needsReRenderis a reasonable, cheap signal for directory changesFor non-empty panels, comparing
filepath.Dir(panel.element[0].location)topanel.locationis a simple, O(1) way to detect that the panel’s directory view is stale after a location change. For empty panels it conservatively returnstrue, forcing a reload. This is safe and aligned with how elements are produced.
747-758:getElementsForPanelcleanly centralizes directory vs search-mode loadingThis helper:
- Routes to
returnDirElementBySearchStringwhen the search bar is non-empty, passinglocation,toggleDotFile, andsortOptions.data.- Falls back to
returnDirElementotherwise.This deduplicates logic that was previously inlined in the main loop and makes the panel update flow easier to follow, without changing semantics.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/internal/model.go (1)
698-719: File panel update refactor and hover-to-file flow look correct
getFilePanelItemsnow usesshouldSkipPanelUpdatefor throttling,getElementsForPanelfor centralized element loading, and always callsscrollToCursor, which keeps viewport/cursor invariants intact even when a panel is skipped.- Non-focused panels are throttled via the 3s window unless
updatedToggleDotFileis set, so dotfile toggles still force a refresh on all panels.- Focused panel throttling via
reRenderTime := int(float64(len(filePanel.element)) / 100)andneedsReRender()ensures directory changes bypass throttling while large directories don’t get re-scanned on every tick.needsReRendertreating emptyelementas “needs re-render” is reasonable for freshly-created or just-cleared panels.getElementsForPanelcleanly centralizes the “search vs non-search” code, reducing duplication from the old inline logic.applyTargetFileCursorcorrectly:
- walks
panel.elementonce,- sets
cursoron the first matchingname == targetFile,- then clears
targetFileso the hover-to-file behavior is one-shot and doesn’t keep fighting later cursor moves.scrollToCursor(m.mainPanelHeight)being called after the (optional) cursor move ensures the target file is scrolled into view when present, and safely no-ops when the directory is empty ortargetFiledidn’t match.One tiny optional clean-up, if you care about micro-optimizations: you could lift
nowTime := time.Now()andfocusPanelReRender := focusPanel.needsReRender()out of the loop and passfocusPanelReRenderintoshouldSkipPanelUpdateas a bool, but the current version is clear and perfectly fine.Also applies to: 721-737, 739-745, 747-758, 760-769
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/internal/config_function.go(3 hunks)src/internal/model.go(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/internal/config_function.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (14)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1040
File: src/internal/function.go:58-58
Timestamp: 2025-09-05T08:04:14.324Z
Learning: lazysegtree asked about "dual-panel functionality" and "secondary focus" in the superfile codebase. The system actually supports multiple file panels (not specifically dual-panel), where users can create/close panels and navigate between them. The old `secondFocus` state was used to mark non-active panels when multiple panels were open, not for a specific dual-panel feature. The focus states were: noneFocus (no file panel focused), focus (active panel), and secondFocus (inactive panels).
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 730
File: src/internal/model_render.go:653-654
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:02:04.260Z
Learning: A panel validation function should be implemented to ensure panel.cursor doesn't become negative or go out of bounds, but this should be addressed in a separate PR - not as part of the PR fixing crashes when opening files with the editor on an empty panel.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.721Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/model_render.go:329-341
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T14:11:21.380Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer help menu rendering optimizations and other technical debt improvements to separate GitHub issues when the current PR scope has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking performance improvements for future work.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 985
File: src/internal/model.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T01:49:30.040Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers maintaining code correctness through proper design and invariants rather than adding defensive bounds checks at every slice access point, viewing such defensive programming as "duct taping" that can mask actual bugs instead of fixing them at their source.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go:7-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T14:49:31.221Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep test-only code simple without adding production-level concerns like goroutine synchronization, cancellation contexts, or complex lifecycle management, even when such patterns might prevent potential issues, since the complexity isn't justified for test utilities.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:149-149
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T13:29:11.771Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep PR scope focused on the primary objectives and considers pre-existing technical debt issues as out of scope for migration/refactoring PRs, preferring to defer such issues to separate GitHub issues rather than expanding the current PR scope.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.
📚 Learning: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, the preview panel refactoring created duplicate ImagePreviewer instances (one in defaultModelConfig and another in preview.New()), which caused image preview crashes. The refactoring also renamed SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and moved global batCmd to per-instance batCmd initialization, all contributing to crashes during image preview and test failures.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 965
File: src/internal/config_function.go:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-07-29T03:42:36.581Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that introduce new async patterns (like moving from global channels to dedicated processbar channels), always check for incomplete refactoring where critical functionality like navigation depends on data structures that are no longer being populated, as this often leads to completely broken features.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T15:32:06.922Z
Learning: When reviewing large refactoring PRs that change async patterns (like moving from goroutines to tea.Cmd), always check for incomplete refactoring where some call sites still use the old pattern while others use the new pattern, as this often leads to compilation errors and architectural inconsistencies.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When reviewing PRs, especially large refactoring ones, focus specifically on issues introduced by the changes rather than flagging pre-existing architectural problems or code smells that were already present before the PR. Distinguish between new bugs versus existing technical debt.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 979
File: src/internal/common/predefined_variable.go:47-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T10:54:31.444Z
Learning: When lazysegtree says a review is "inaccurate and pre-existing issues. Not much useful," it means I should focus specifically on bugs or problems introduced by the current PR changes, not architectural concerns or code quality issues that were already present. The refactoring work in superfile PRs is generally well-implemented and should be evaluated on whether the specific changes work correctly, not on broader codebase architecture.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 781
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:46-48
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T03:48:46.327Z
Learning: The user (lazysegtree) prefers to keep PRs focused and manageable in size, sometimes intentionally leaving TODO comments to track minor issues for later PRs rather than addressing everything at once.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1021
File: .gitignore:37-37
Timestamp: 2025-08-27T11:32:17.326Z
Learning: In PR #1021 for yorukot/superfile, lazysegtree reported image preview crashes and rename test failures after refactoring FilePreviewPanel to a separate preview package. The crashes were likely caused by: 1) imagePreviewer initialization differences between old global variable and new per-instance creation, 2) method name changes from SetContextWithRenderText to SetContentWithRenderText, and 3) batCmd initialization moving from global to per-instance without preserving the original configuration.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 781
File: src/internal/model_render.go:254-256
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T04:27:33.074Z
Learning: When race conditions or other issues that are unrelated to the current PR's focus are identified during review, lazysegtree prefers creating separate GitHub issues to track them rather than addressing them in the current PR. This helps maintain PR focus and scope.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-29T13:56:33.955Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1011
File: src/internal/handle_modal.go:145-203
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T13:56:33.955Z
Learning: lazysegtree identified that help menu navigation functions (helpMenuListUp and helpMenuListDown) in src/internal/handle_modal.go are too complicated, can be simplified, are similar to sidebar navigation but inconsistent, and lack unit tests. He prefers to track such technical debt in separate GitHub issues rather than addressing it in the current PR scope.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
📚 Learning: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 770
File: src/internal/ui/sidebar/render.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T13:51:24.691Z
Learning: In the sidebar component of yorukot/superfile, the partial list rendering in render.go is intentional. The sidebar implements scrolling functionality where ListUp/ListDown methods in navigation.go update cursor position and renderIndex to show the appropriate portion of the directory list based on available space.
Applied to files:
src/internal/model.go
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/internal/model.go (3)
src/internal/model_navigation_test.go (1)
TestFilePanelNavigation(15-149)src/internal/model_render.go (1)
panel(111-151)src/internal/test_utils.go (1)
navigateToTargetDir(207-214)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/internal/model.go (1)
41-43: InitialModel rename tofirstPanelPathscorrectly reflects new startup behaviorThe parameter rename and plumbing through
initialConfig/defaultModelConfigpreserve behavior while making it clear that inputs may be files or directories, which matches the “open parent dir + hover file” feature. No issues here.
yorukot
approved these changes
Dec 8, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.