Skip to content

Conversation

@shamoilattaar-wednesday
Copy link
Collaborator

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 3 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
  • yarn.lock

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-JS-REMIXRUNROUTER-14908530
  646  
high severity Open Redirect
SNYK-JS-REACTROUTER-14908286
  641  
high severity Open Redirect
SNYK-JS-REMIXRUNROUTER-14908287
  641  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Open Redirect
🦉 Cross-site Scripting (XSS)

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 10, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @shamoilattaar-wednesday, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the application's security posture by upgrading the react-router-dom dependency to its latest major version. This critical update resolves several high-severity vulnerabilities, including XSS and Open Redirects, ensuring a more secure user experience and protecting against potential exploits. The changes are primarily confined to dependency management files, reflecting the necessary package version bumps and their associated sub-dependencies.

Highlights

  • Security Upgrade: The react-router-dom package has been upgraded from version 6.26.1 to 7.0.0 to address three high-severity vulnerabilities.
  • Vulnerability Fixes: This upgrade specifically fixes a Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability (SNYK-JS-REMIXRUNROUTER-14908530) and two Open Redirect vulnerabilities (SNYK-JS-REACTROUTER-14908286, SNYK-JS-REMIXRUNROUTER-14908287).
  • Dependency Updates: The yarn.lock file has been updated to reflect the new react-router-dom version and its transitive dependencies, including react-router and the introduction of cookie and set-cookie-parser.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, upgrades react-router-dom to address security vulnerabilities. However, this introduces two significant risks. First, react-router-dom is upgraded to v7.0.0, which is a pre-release version. Using pre-release software in production is highly discouraged due to instability and breaking changes. Second, @react-native-async-storage/async-storage is downgraded from v2.0.0 to v1.23.1, which is also a major version change that can cause breakages. I have added comments on both package.json and yarn.lock to highlight these critical issues. Please review these changes carefully and perform extensive testing before merging.

I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.

package.json (86)

critical

This change upgrades react-router-dom to v7.0.0, which is a major version bump. The resolved version in yarn.lock is 7.12.0, which appears to be a pre-release version. Using pre-release versions in production is highly discouraged due to potential instability, bugs, and further breaking changes.

It is critical to:

  1. Verify the stability requirements of this project and confirm if using a pre-release is acceptable.
  2. Review the migration guide for react-router v7 for breaking changes.
  3. Perform thorough regression testing on all routing-related features.

If a pre-release is not suitable, consider waiting for a stable v7 release or exploring alternative mitigations for the security vulnerabilities.

yarn.lock (2202-2205)

high

This part of the lockfile change indicates a major version downgrade for @react-native-async-storage/async-storage from v2.0.0 to v1.23.1. This was likely an automatic correction by yarn to match package.json, but it's a significant change that can introduce breaking changes.

Please ensure this downgrade is intentional and thoroughly test all functionality that relies on async-storage to prevent regressions.

@github-actions
Copy link

Coverage report

Statements coverage not met for global: expected >=80%, but got 79.09604519774011%

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟡 Statements 79.1% 140/177
🔴 Branches 44% 11/25
🟡 Functions 67.24% 39/58
🟢 Lines 80.25% 126/157

Test suite run success

47 tests passing in 17 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 2702c7e

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants