Skip to content

FIX: NixlConnector: do not skip short do_remote_prefill requests #18590

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

juncgu
Copy link

@juncgu juncgu commented May 23, 2025

The original issue is #18490, and #18429 wanted to fix it.

But skipping short do_remote_prefill request in connector's metadata will also skip sending the notification to the prefill worker for releasing remote kv pages.

The modifications here are

  1. revoke the changes from [Bugfix][Failing Test] Fix nixl connector test when promt size < block size #18429
  2. update test_nixl_connector.py::test_prompt_less_than_block_size accordingly

FIX #18591

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

@mergify mergify bot added the v1 label May 23, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@wwl2755 wwl2755 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for pointing out! Sorry for the oversight on existing logic of handling 0 block situation.

Signed-off-by: Juncheng Gu <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: NixlConnector should not skip short do_remote_prefill requests in connector metadata
2 participants