viosock: Fix missing return type and integer overflow #1498
+6
−5
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fix Coverity CID 475471 by adding VOID return type to VIOSockReadProcessDequeueCb. Fix Coverity CID 475412 by preventing DWORD-to-int overflow in Send() function and fixing infinite loop caused by checking pointer instead of value. Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Ashurov <eashurov@redhat.com>
elizashurov
force-pushed
the
fix/viosock-coverity-warnings
branch
from
b3d720d to
5a73239
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix Coverity CID 475471 by adding VOID return type to VIOSockReadProcessDequeueCb.
Fix Coverity CID 475412 by preventing DWORD-to-int overflow in Send() function and fixing infinite loop caused by checking pointer instead of value.