Skip to content

DNM: Use 4 cores for kokoro weekly #1191

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

DNM: Use 4 cores for kokoro weekly #1191

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

litghost
Copy link
Collaborator

@litghost litghost commented Mar 5, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Description

Attempt to increase kokoro weekly to use 4 cores.

Related Issue

#1118

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed

@probot-autolabeler probot-autolabeler bot added infra Project Infrastructure lang-cpp C/C++ code lang-shell Shell scripts (bash etc.) scripts Utility & Infrastructure scripts tests VTR Flow VTR Design Flow (scripts/benchmarks/architectures) labels Mar 5, 2020
@litghost litghost changed the title DNM: DNM: Use 4 cores for kokoro weekly Mar 5, 2020
@litghost litghost closed this Mar 5, 2020
@litghost litghost deleted the faster_weekly_4_core branch March 5, 2020 19:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
infra Project Infrastructure lang-cpp C/C++ code lang-shell Shell scripts (bash etc.) scripts Utility & Infrastructure scripts tests VTR Flow VTR Design Flow (scripts/benchmarks/architectures)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@litghost