Skip to content

Conversation

@mstojkovicTT
Copy link
Contributor

@mstojkovicTT mstojkovicTT commented Dec 18, 2025

Ticket

fixes: #2262

Problem description

explained in #2262

What's changed

Added support for nn.ConvTranspose2d.

Checklist

  • Wait for MLIR PR to be merged and uplifted

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66.56%. Comparing base (b53e143) to head (cabb0cf).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2629   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.56%   66.56%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         326      326           
=======================================
  Hits          217      217           
  Misses        109      109           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mstojkovicTT
Copy link
Contributor Author

ConvTranspose2D, when wrapped to composite, gives the same results as just normally lowering it to TTIR from SHLO (trough convolution path with dilation checks). I dont think it makes sense to have this composite, at least for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Lower conv transpose 2d as composite

3 participants