Conversation
Pre-allocate `allowedValues` slice to avoid re-allocations during loop. Added `gen_enum_benchmark_test.go` to verify performance. Co-authored-by: sudorandom <310004+sudorandom@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
💡 What: Pre-allocate the
allowedValuesslice ingen_enum.gousingmakewith the known capacity ofallEnumValues.Len().🎯 Why: To avoid inefficient slice appending and potential re-allocations when iterating over enum values. This is an O(N) allocation improvement for large enums.
📊 Measured Improvement:
Created a benchmark
BenchmarkEnumFunctioningen_enum_benchmark_test.go.For small enums (2-4 values), the improvement is negligible/not measurable due to stack allocation optimizations and dominance of other operations (~87-190 ns/op).
However, for larger enums (which may exist in user schemas), this change avoids O(log N) reallocations and ensures O(1) allocation overhead.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 16328042578279410418 started by @sudorandom