Skip to content

Add a section for WebAsyncTask in mvc-ann-async.adoc #34885

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

addoDev
Copy link
Contributor

@addoDev addoDev commented May 13, 2025

This update adds a section explaining WebAsyncTask return type for @controller class methods along with java and kotlin example code.
It helps ensure the documentation reflects all officially supported async return types, improving clarity for developers using Spring MVC's asynchronous processing features.

Added a section explaining WebAsyncTask return type along with java and kotlin example code.

Signed-off-by: addoDev <[email protected]>
@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on label May 13, 2025
Added a section explaining WebAsyncTask return type along with java and kotlin example code.

Signed-off-by: addoDev <[email protected]>
@rstoyanchev rstoyanchev self-assigned this Jun 3, 2025
@rstoyanchev rstoyanchev added in: test Issues in the test module type: documentation A documentation task and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on labels Jun 3, 2025
@rstoyanchev rstoyanchev added this to the 6.2.8 milestone Jun 3, 2025
rstoyanchev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2025
Added section for WebAsyncTask return type along with java and
kotlin example code

See gh-34885

Signed-off-by: addoDev <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in: test Issues in the test module type: documentation A documentation task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants