andi makes easy implementing custom dependency injection mechanisms
where dependencies are expressed using type annotations.
andi is useful as a building block for frameworks, or as a library
which helps to implement dependency injection (thus the name -
ANnotation-based Dependency Injection).
License is BSD 3-clause.
pip install andi
andi requires Python >= 3.9.
See the following classes that represents parts of a car (and the car itself):
class Valves:
pass
class Engine:
def __init__(self, valves):
self.valves = valves
class Wheels:
pass
class Car:
def __init__(self, engine, wheels):
self.engine = engine
self.wheels = wheelsThe following would be the usual way of build a Car instance:
valves = Valves()
engine = Engine(valves)
wheels = Wheels()
car = Car(engine, wheels)There are some dependencies between the classes: A car requires and engine and wheels to be built, as well as the engine requires valves. These are the car dependencies and sub-dependencies.
The question is, could we have an automatic way of building instances?
For example, could we have a build function that
given the Car class or any other class would return an instance
even if the class itself has some other dependencies?
car = build(Car) # Andi helps creating this generic build functionandi inspect the dependency tree and creates a plan making easy creating
such a build function.
This is how this plan for the Car class would looks like:
- Invoke
Valveswith empty arguments - Invoke
Engineusing the instance created in 1 as the argumentvalves - Invoke
Wheelswith empty arguments - Invoke
Carswith the instance created in 2 as theengineargument and with the instance created in 3 as thewheelsargument
But there is a missing piece in the Car example before. How can
andi know that the class Valves is required to build the
argument valves? A first idea would be to use the argument
name as a hint for the class name
(as pinject does),
but andi opts to rely on arguments' type annotations instead.
The classes for Car should then be rewritten as:
class Valves:
pass
class Engine:
def __init__(self, valves: Valves):
self.valves = valves
class Wheels:
pass
class Car:
def __init__(self, engine: Engine, wheels: Wheels):
self.engine = engine
self.wheels = wheelsNote how now there is a explicit annotation stating that the
valves argument is of type Valves
(same for engine and wheels).
The andi.plan function can now create a plan to build the
Car class (ignore the is_injectable parameter by now):
plan = andi.plan(Car, is_injectable={Engine, Wheels, Valves})This is what the plan variable contains:
[(Valves, {}),
(Engine, {'valves': Valves}),
(Wheels, {}),
(Car, {'engine': Engine,
'wheels': Wheels})]Note how this plan correspond exactly to the 4-steps plan described in the previous section.
Creating a generic function to build the instances from
a plan generated by andi is then very easy:
def build(plan):
instances = {}
for fn_or_cls, kwargs_spec in plan:
instances[fn_or_cls] = fn_or_cls(**kwargs_spec.kwargs(instances))
return instancesSo let's see putting all the pieces together. The following code
creates an instance of Car using andi:
plan = andi.plan(Car, is_injectable={Engine, Wheels, Valves})
instances = build(plan)
car = instances[Car]It is not always desired for andi to manage every single annotation found.
Instead is usually better to explicitly declare which types
can be handled by andi. The argument is_injectable
allows to customize this feature.
andi will raise an error on the presence of a dependency that cannot be resolved
because it is not injectable.
Usually is desirable to declare injectabilty by
creating a base class to inherit from. For example,
we could create a base class Injectable as base
class for the car components:
class Injectable(ABC):
pass
class Valves(Injectable):
pass
class Engine(Injectable):
def __init__(self, valves: Valves):
self.valves = valves
class Wheels(Injectable):
passThe call to andi.plan would then be:
is_injectable = lambda cls: issubclass(cls, Injectable)
plan = andi.plan(Car, is_injectable=is_injectable)Dependency injection is also very useful when applied to functions.
Imagine that you have a function drive that drives the Car
through the Road:
class Road(Injectable):
...
def drive(car: Car, road: Road, speed):
... # Drive the car through the roadThe dependencies has to be resolved before invoking
the drive function:
plan = andi.plan(drive, is_injectable=is_injectable)
instances = build(plan.dependencies)Now the drive function can be invoked:
drive(instances[Car], instances[Road], 100)Note that speed argument was not annotated. The resultant plan just won't include it
because the andi.plan full_final_kwargs parameter is False
by default. Otherwise, an exception would have been raised (see full_final_kwargs argument
documentation for more information).
An alternative and more generic way to invoke the drive function would be:
drive(speed=100, **plan.final_kwargs(instances))andi supports classes defined using attrs
and also dataclasses.
For example the Car class could have been defined as:
# attrs class example
@attr.s(auto_attribs=True)
class Car:
engine: Engine
wheels: Wheels
# dataclass example
@dataclass
class Car(Injectable):
engine: Engine
wheels: WheelsUsing attrs or dataclass is handy because they avoid
some boilerplate.
Retaining the control over object instantiation could be desired in some cases. For example creating a database connection could require accessing some credentials registry or getting the connection from a pool so you might want to control building such instances outside of the regular dependency injection mechanism.
andi.plan allows to specify which types would be
externally provided. Let's see an example:
class DBConnection(ABC):
@abstractmethod
def getConn():
pass
@dataclass
class UsersDAO:
conn: DBConnection
def getUsers():
return self.conn.query("SELECT * FROM USERS")UsersDAO requires a database connection to run queries.
But the connection will be provided externally from a pool, so we
call then andi.plan using also the externally_provided
parameter:
plan = andi.plan(UsersDAO, is_injectable=is_injectable,
externally_provided={DBConnection})The build method should then be modified slightly to be able to inject externally provided instances:
def build(plan, instances_stock=None):
instances_stock = instances_stock or {}
instances = {}
for fn_or_cls, kwargs_spec in plan:
if fn_or_cls in instances_stock:
instances[fn_or_cls] = instances_stock[fn_or_cls]
else:
instances[fn_or_cls] = fn_or_cls(**kwargs_spec.kwargs(instances))
return instancesNow we are ready to create UserDAO instances with andi:
plan = andi.plan(UsersDAO, is_injectable=is_injectable,
externally_provided={DBConnection})
dbconnection = DBPool.get_connection()
instances = build(plan.dependencies, {DBConnection: dbconnection})
users_dao = instances[UsersDAO]
users = user_dao.getUsers()Note that being injectable is not required for externally provided dependencies.
Optional type annotations can be used in case of
dependencies that can be optional. For example:
@dataclass
class Dashboard:
conn: Optional[DBConnection]
def showPage():
if self.conn:
self.conn.query("INSERT INTO VISITS ...")
... # renders a HTML pageIn this example, the Dashboard class generates a HTML page to be served, and
also stores the number of visits into a database. Database
could be absent in some environments, but you might want
the dashboard to work even if it cannot log the visits.
When a database connection is possible the plan call would be:
plan = andi.plan(UsersDAO, is_injectable=is_injectable,
externally_provided={DBConnection})And the following when the connection is absent:
plan = andi.plan(UsersDAO, is_injectable=is_injectable,
externally_provided={})It is also required to register the type of None
as injectable. Otherwise andi.plan with raise an exception
saying that "NoneType is not injectable".
Injectable.register(type(None))Union can also be used to express alternatives. For example:
@dataclass
class UsersDAO:
conn: Union[ProductionDBConnection, DevelopmentDBConnection]DevelopmentDBConnection will be injected in the absence of
ProductionDBConnection.
Annotated type annotations can be used to attach arbitrary metadata that
will be preserved in the plan. Occurrences of the same type annotated with
different metadata will not be considered duplicates. For example:
@dataclass
class Dashboard:
conn_main: Annotated[DBConnection, "main DB"]
conn_stats: Annotated[DBConnection, "stats DB"]The plan will contain both dependencies.
Sometimes a dependency can't be created directly but needs some additional code to be built. And that code can also have its own dependencies:
class Wheels:
pass
def wheel_factory(wheel_builder: WheelBuilder) -> Wheels:
return wheel_builder.get_wheels()As by default andi can't know how to create a Wheels instance or that
the plan needs to create a WheelBuilder instance first, it needs to be told
this with a custom_builder_fn argument:
custom_builders = {
Wheels: wheel_factory,
}
plan = andi.plan(Car, is_injectable={Engine, Wheels, Valves},
custom_builder_fn=custom_builders.get,
)custom_builder_fn should be a function that takes a type and returns a factory
for that type.
The build code also needs to know how to build Wheels instances. A plan step
for an object built with a custom builder uses an instance of the andi.CustomBuilder
wrapper that contains the type to be built in the result_class_or_fn attribute and
the callable for building it in the factory attribute:
from andi import CustomBuilder
def build(plan):
instances = {}
for fn_or_cls, kwargs_spec in plan:
if isinstance(fn_or_cls, CustomBuilder):
instances[fn_or_cls.result_class_or_fn] = fn_or_cls.factory(**kwargs_spec.kwargs(instances))
else:
instances[fn_or_cls] = fn_or_cls(**kwargs_spec.kwargs(instances))
return instancesBy default andi.plan won't fail if it is not able to provide
some of the direct dependencies for the given input (see the
speed argument in one of the examples above).
This behaviour is desired when inspecting functions
for which is already known that some arguments won't be
injectable but they will be provided by other means
(like the drive function above).
But in other cases is better to be sure that all dependencies
are fulfilled and otherwise fail. Such is the case for classes.
So it is recommended to set full_final_kwargs=True when invoking
andi.plan for classes.
Let's go back to the Car example. Imagine you want to build a car again.
But this time you want to replace the Engine because this is
going to be an electric car!. And of course, an electric engine contains a battery
and have no valves at all. This could be the new Engine:
class Battery:
pass
class ElectricEngine(Engine):
def __init__(self, battery: Battery):
self.battery = valvesAndi offers the possibility to replace dependencies when planning,
and this is what is required to build the electric car: we need
to replace any dependency on Engine by a dependency on ElectricEngine.
This is exactly what overrides offers. Let's see how plan should
be invoked in this case:
plan = andi.plan(Car, is_injectable=is_injectable,
overrides={Engine: ElectricEngine}.get)Note that Andi will unroll the new dependencies properly. That is,
Valves and Engine won't be in the resultant plan but
ElectricEngine and Battery will.
In summary, overrides offers a way to override the default dependencies anywhere in the tree, changing them with an alternative one.
By default overrides are not recursive: overrides aren't applied
over the children of an already overridden dependency. There
is flag to turn recursion on if this is what is desired.
Check andi.plan documentation for more information.
andi uses type annotations to declare dependencies (inputs).
It has several advantages, and some limitations as well.
Advantages:
- Built-in language feature.
- You're not lying when specifying a type - these annotations still work as usual type annotations.
- In many projects you'd annotate arguments anyways, so
andisupport is "for free".
Limitations:
- Callable can't have two arguments of the same type.
- This feature could possibly conflict with regular type annotation usages.
If your callable has two arguments of the same type, consider making them different types. For example, a callable may receive url and html of a web page:
def parse(html: str, url: str):
# ...To make it play well with andi, you may define separate types for url
and for html:
class HTML(str):
pass
class URL(str):
pass
def parse(html: HTML, url: URL):
# ...This is more boilerplate though.
Currently andi just inspects callable and chooses best concrete types
a framework needs to create and pass to a callable, without prescribing how
to create them. This makes andi useful in various contexts - e.g.
- creation of some objects may require asynchronous functions, and it may depend on libraries used (asyncio, twisted, etc.)
- in streaming architectures (e.g. based on Kafka) inspection may happen on one machine, while creation of objects may happen on different nodes in a distributed system, and then actually running a callable may happen on yet another machine.
It is hard to design API with enough flexibility for all such use cases.
That said, andi may provide more helpers in future,
once patterns emerge, even if they're useful only in certain contexts.
Nothing better than a example to understand how andi can be useful.
Let's imagine you want to implemented a callback based framework
for writing spiders to crawl web pages.
The basic idea is that there is framework in which the user can write spiders. Each spider is a collection of callbacks that can process data from a page, emit extracted data or request new pages. Then, there is an engine that takes care of downloading the web pages and invoking the user defined callbacks, chaining requests with its corresponding callback.
Let's see an example of an spider to download recipes from a cooking page:
class MySpider(Spider):
start_url = "htttp://a_page_with_a_list_of_recipes"
def parse(self, response):
for url in recipes_urls_from_page(response)
yield Request(url, callback=parse_recipe)
def parse_recipe(self, response):
yield extract_recipe(response)It would be handy if the user can define some requirements
just by annotating parameters in the callbacks. And andi make it
possible.
For example, a particular callback could require access to the cookies:
def parse(self, response: Response, cookies: CookieJar):
# ... Do something with the response and the cookiesIn this case, the engine can use andi to inspect the parse method, and
detect that Response and CookieJar are required.
Then the framework will build them and will invoke the callback.
This functionality would serve to inject into the users callbacks some components only when they are required.
It could also serve to encapsulate better the user code. For example, we could just decouple the recipe extraction into it's own class:
@dataclass
class RecipeExtractor:
response: Response
def to_item():
return extract_recipe(self.response)The callback could then be defined as:
def parse_recipe(extractor: RecipeExtractor):
yield extractor.to_item()Note how handy is that with andi the engine can create
an instance of RecipesExtractor feeding it with the
declared Response dependency.
In definitive, using andi in such a framework
can provide great flexibility to the user
and reduce boilerplate.
andi can be useful also for implementing a new
web framework.
Let's imagine a framework where you can declare your sever in a class like the following:
class MyWeb(Server):
@route("/products")
def productspage(self, request: Request):
... # return the composed page
@route("/sales")
def salespage(self, request: Request):
... # return the composed pageThe former case is composed of two endpoints, one for serving a page with a summary of sales, and a second one to serve the products list.
Connection to the database can be required to sever these pages. This logic could be encapsulated in some classes:
@dataclass
class Products:
conn: DBConnection
def get_products()
return self.conn.query("SELECT ...")
@dataclass
class Sales:
conn: DBConnection
def get_sales()
return self.conn.query("SELECT ...")Now productspage and salespage methods can just declare
that they require these objects:
class MyWeb(Server):
@route("/products")
def productspage(self, request: Request, products: Products):
... # return the composed page
@route("/sales")
def salespage(self, request: Request, sales: Sales):
... # return the composed pageAnd the framework can then be responsible to fulfill these dependencies. The flexibility offered would be a great advantage. As an example, if would be very easy to create a page that requires both sales and products:
@route("/overview")
def productspage(self, request: Request,
products: Products, sales: Sales):
... # return the composed overview page- Source code: https://github.com/scrapinghub/andi
- Issue tracker: https://github.com/scrapinghub/andi/issues
Use tox to run tests with different Python versions:
tox
The command above also runs type checks; we use mypy.