adding support for eucalyptus

[jeevanullas]

Hi,

Following patch add support eucalyptus. It adds service_path configuration for folks who use Eucalyptus walrus without DNS and takes care of create_request a bit to make it work for Eucalyptus.

Tested against Eucalyptus 4.0.0 that uses a new object storage gateway with backend riakcs but should work for s3 and walrus as well.

Please let me know if there are any questions. I am happy to test with this patch against S3 to ensure nothing is broken if you have any test cases.

Cheers!
Deependra

[hrchu]

Why don't you just change host_bucket and host_base to walrus endpoint?

[jeevanullas]

Hi,

Apparently its not so simple to just point them to walrus and make it work.

[hrchu]

Ok. I just provide a config method I know that works with some S3 compatible implementation.

[jeevanullas]

Can you give me the config file you used? I can try it on my system. I am not able to find it here

[johnbellone]

👍

[epankala]

👍

[halrogers-claritas]

👍

[jamshid]

Not sure what extra support is needed. I use s3cmd with an S3-compatible service whose endpoint is https://storage.example.com and s3cmd works fine.

Here is my ~/.s3cfg. A command like s3cmd ls s3://mybucket accesses buckets like this: GET https://storage.example.com/mybucket.

[default]
access_key = XXX
host_base = storage.example.com
host_bucket = storage.example.com
secret_key = secret
signature_v2=True
use_https = True