⚡️ Speed up method Dinov2WithRegistersSelfAttention.transpose_for_scores
by 25% in PR #1250 (feature/inference-v1-models
)
#1256
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #1250
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
feature/inference-v1-models
.📄 25% (0.25x) speedup for
Dinov2WithRegistersSelfAttention.transpose_for_scores
ininference/v1/models/rfdetr/dinov2_with_windowed_attn.py
⏱️ Runtime :
5.10 milliseconds
→4.08 milliseconds
(best of31
runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here is an optimized version of your code, specifically targeting the runtime bottleneck revealed in the profiler: the transpose_for_scores function.
The main optimization is to replace
view()
andpermute()
with a single call toreshape()
followed bytranspose()
, which is typically more efficient, especially for large tensors.This avoids creating non-contiguous tensors, and, in many cases, can make better use of internal strides, minimizing unnecessary data movement.
No function signatures or return values are changed. All existing comments are preserved.
Explanation of optimizations:
view()
(which requires the tensor to be contiguous) and thenpermute()
, usingreshape()
followed bytranspose()
is both faster and more robust, and preferred in PyTorch for this kind of operation.transpose(1, 2)
directly swaps the sequence and head dimensions, achieving the same aspermute(0, 2, 1, 3)
but faster in practice for rank-4 tensors with the given dimensions.This version will have the exact same outputs and interface as your original, but with significantly improved runtime and memory handling for the "transpose_for_scores" function.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr1250-2025-05-13T12.59.27
and push.