Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] optimize remover_produto existence check#78

Open
rauhmaru wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-remover-produto-8303818743258221029
Open

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] optimize remover_produto existence check#78
rauhmaru wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-remover-produto-8303818743258221029

Conversation

@rauhmaru

@rauhmaru rauhmaru commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What

Replaced a full table scan and a nested python-side iteration loop within remover_produto with TinyDB's native .contains() combined with a .any() query.

🎯 Why

When deleting a product, the application needs to ensure the product isn't actively being used as an ingredient in any saved cocktail recipe. Previously, this meant calling cocktails_table.all() (loading the entire table into memory) and manually scanning every nested ingredient array in Python to look for the ID.

This O(N * M) operation is memory-intensive and slow, especially as the cocktail table grows. TinyDB supports querying within nested lists.

📊 Impact

Changes the check from an O(N * M) full-table Python-side scan into an optimized TinyDB internal check that immediately short-circuits (O(1) to O(K)) upon finding the very first match. This reduces memory allocations (no longer returning all documents to the application layer) and speeds up the API endpoint for valid and blocked deletions.

🔬 Measurement

Tests pass smoothly (python -m pytest test_app.py). Tested existence validation by seeding mock data.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 8303818743258221029 started by @rauhmaru

…check

Co-authored-by: rauhmaru <2289237+rauhmaru@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant