gnome/nixos: guard nixpkgs.overlays with stylix.overlays.enable#2176
Merged
0xda157 merged 1 commit intonix-community:masterfrom Jan 31, 2026
Conversation
Fixes: eb19696 ("stylix: add overlay module (nix-community#1048)")
stylix-automation
bot
added
topic: nixos
0xda157
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This consistently guards the
nixpkgs.overlaysdeclaration withstylix.overlays.enable. Although the technically correct fix is to move thisnixpkgs.overlaysdeclaration into/modules/gnome/overlay.nix, which was forgotten in commit eb19696 ("stylix: add overlay module (#1048)"), I chose this hotfix because the/modules/<MODULE>/overlay.nixpattern will be gone after #2174 anyway. Afterwards, the truly correct behavior is established when/modules/gnome/nixos.nixhas migrated to our custom module system.This inconsistency was first mentioned in #2107 (comment).