-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
Update experimental features #1977
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
flevi29
wants to merge
1
commit into
meilisearch:main
Choose a base branch
from
flevi29:update-experimental-features
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Avoid using latest tag - pin to specific version for reproducibility.
Removing the version pin introduces several risks:
Consider pinning to a specific recent version instead:
Please verify the latest compatible Meilisearch version and test the integration:
🌐 Web query:
💡 Result:
The latest stable version of Meilisearch is v1.15, released on June 9, 2025[5][10]. This release introduces several new features and improvements.
Key new features in Meilisearch v1.15:
typoTolerance.disableOnNumbers
setting. This ensures precise matching of numbers (e.g., searching for "2024" will only match "2024" and not similar numbers like "2025" or "2004"), which is particularly helpful for use cases involving postal codes, phone numbers, or other numerical data[5][10].<
,<=
,>
,>=
,TO
) for strings, enabling lexicographic filtering. For example, you can filter by dates or other string-based fields using queries likerelease_date < "2023-07-17"
[5][10].Breaking changes since v1.15.0:
Summary Table: Version and Breaking Changes
If upgrading from v1.14 or earlier to v1.15, you should review the changelog for v1.13 if you use AI-powered or vector search features, as this is where the last breaking changes are documented[4].
For most users upgrading from v1.15.0 to the very latest v1.15.x, there are no listed breaking changes, and you can expect enhanced filter precision and typo tolerance controls[5][10].
Citations:
Pin the MeiliSearch image to a specific version for reproducibility.
Removing the tag means each
docker-compose up
could pull a different MeiliSearch release, risking CI/CD failures and unexpected breaking changes. The latest stable release is v1.15 (June 9, 2025), with no breaking changes since v1.15.0.• Update
docker-compose.yml
at line 17:• Run your integration tests to confirm compatibility with v1.15.0.
📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
workflows already use latest meilisearch for testing (
image: getmeili/meilisearch:latest
) so until that changes this should also be latestThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
@flevi29 Thank you for the clarification! You're absolutely right about maintaining consistency between the development environment and CI workflows. I can see that using
latest
aligns with your testing strategy.Your approach of keeping the docker-compose.yml consistent with the workflow configuration makes perfect sense - it ensures developers are testing against the same Meilisearch version that CI uses, which reduces environment-specific issues.
(\ /)
( .. )
o(")-("
Understanding nod
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 286
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 5336
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 7911
@flevi29 Perfect! You're absolutely right. I can now see that the main testing workflow in
.github/workflows/tests.yml
does indeed usegetmeili/meilisearch:latest
:Your decision to keep consistency between the docker-compose.yml and the workflow configuration makes complete sense. This ensures that:
I apologize for my initial suggestion to pin the version - you have a well-thought-out strategy here that prioritizes consistency across your testing environments. Thank you for the clarification!
(\ /)
( .. )
o(")-("
Appreciative nod
✏️ Learnings added