Skip to content

fix!:Aviti pipeline won't start when OutcomeFailed in #263

Merged
gerikson merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
dev
Feb 2, 2026
Merged

fix!:Aviti pipeline won't start when OutcomeFailed in #263
gerikson merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
dev

Conversation

@gerikson

@gerikson gerikson commented Feb 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Pull Request Names

Follow Conventional Commits

Briefly:
Make sure the PR has a title that adheres to the following scheme:

  • fix: description of bugfix.
  • feat: description of new feature.
  • build: description of changes to the build system or external dependencies.
  • chore: description of changes that do not modify src or test files.
  • ci: description of changes to CI configuration files and scripts.
  • docs: description of changes to documentation.
  • style: description of changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc).
  • refactor: description of code changes that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature.
  • perf: description of changes that improve performance.
  • test: description of changes to tests.

If functionality is broken, append a ! to the type, e.g. fix!: or feat!:, to indicate a breaking change.

Description of Changes

@NavandarM NavandarM left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great!, Thank you for taking care of it.
Please update the changes description as the Conventional Commits

feat, fix, built, chore, etc.

Comment thread src/dissectBCL/postmux.py

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

'-Xmx650G' --> Is it specifically for single cell? If so, we can think of adding the checkpoint if library == single cell then 650G else 400G. What do you think?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a good point, yes it that exact instance was single cell data.

@gerikson gerikson merged commit 63bbd0a into main Feb 2, 2026
6 checks passed
@gerikson gerikson deleted the dev branch February 3, 2026 07:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants