🐛 (helm/v1-alpha): standardized file and directory permissions scaffolding with 0644/0755

[jtyr]

This PR is changing file permissions for files and directories that are created by the Helm plugin. The permissions align with permissions of files and directories created by the kubebuilder itself for example when it generates manifests in the config directory.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @jtyr!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @jtyr. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[camilamacedo86]

Thank you for your contribution 🥇
/lgtm

[camilamacedo86]

/ok-to-test

[camilamacedo86]

Hi @jtyr

Can you please check the lint issue?

Also, note that we need to run make install and make generate to ensure that we will re-scaffold all files with the changes. Can you please do that so we can move forward with this one?

[jtyr]

@camilamacedo86 Thank you for reviewing my PR and giving me pointers how to fix the failing checks. I think I have fixed everything so let's see if the checks pass now.

[camilamacedo86]

Hi @jtyr

That is amazing 🥇
Thank you for your ocntirbution

Could you please:

• Rebase with master ( see that is falling because the code is outdated ; sorry for that )
• Squash the commits ( ideally to ensure a good history we would have 1 PR -> 1 commit -> 1 fix/RFE )

Then, we will have all in place to make this one get merged !!!
Thank you again for your contribution !!
Your help is more than welcome 🎉 .

[jtyr]

@camilamacedo86 I have rebased my feature branch and squashed my commits.

[camilamacedo86]

/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, jtyr

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [camilamacedo86]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment