Skip to content

Fix docs on field customization#742

Merged
jowilf merged 1 commit intojowilf:mainfrom
ricardogsilva:736-custom-field-docs-dont-match-code-implementation
Mar 5, 2026
Merged

Fix docs on field customization#742
jowilf merged 1 commit intojowilf:mainfrom
ricardogsilva:736-custom-field-docs-dont-match-code-implementation

Conversation

@ricardogsilva
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fixes the docs section that describes field customization by correcting the erroneous code samples


@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 4, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.72%. Comparing base (2540c51) to head (07ff879).
⚠️ Report is 60 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              main     #742      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   99.72%   -0.28%     
===========================================
  Files           75       86      +11     
  Lines         5817     6850    +1033     
===========================================
+ Hits          5817     6831    +1014     
- Misses           0       19      +19     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Owner

@jowilf jowilf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jowilf jowilf merged commit 14b955c into jowilf:main Mar 5, 2026
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: custom field docs don't match code implementation

2 participants