Skip to content

Fix possible nil description of pull request when migrating from CodeCommit #34541

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 27, 2025

Conversation

lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented May 27, 2025

Fix #34320

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label May 27, 2025
@lunny lunny added type/bug backport/v1.24 This PR should be backported to Gitea 1.24 and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels May 27, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code label May 27, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label May 27, 2025
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang changed the title Fix possible blank description of pull request when mirating from code commit Fix possible blank description of pull request when migrating from code commit May 27, 2025
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang changed the title Fix possible blank description of pull request when migrating from code commit Fix possible blank description of pull request when migrating from CodeCommit May 27, 2025
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang changed the title Fix possible blank description of pull request when migrating from CodeCommit Fix possible nil description of pull request when migrating from CodeCommit May 27, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels May 27, 2025
@lunny lunny added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label May 27, 2025
@lunny lunny merged commit 24a5105 into go-gitea:main May 27, 2025
26 checks passed
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.25.0 milestone May 27, 2025
@lunny lunny deleted the lunny/fix_migrate_codecommit branch May 27, 2025 18:25
GiteaBot pushed a commit to GiteaBot/gitea that referenced this pull request May 27, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added backport/done All backports for this PR have been created and removed reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. labels May 27, 2025
lunny added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2025
zjjhot added a commit to zjjhot/gitea that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2025
* giteaofficial/main:
  Refactor some tests (go-gitea#34580)
  Do not mutate incoming options to SearchRepositoryByName (go-gitea#34553)
  Fix/improve avatar sync from LDAP (go-gitea#34573)
  Fix some trivial problems (go-gitea#34579)
  Retain issue sort type when a keyword search is introduced (go-gitea#34559)
  Always use an empty line to separate the commit message and trailer (go-gitea#34512)
  Fix line-button issue after file selection in file tree (go-gitea#34574)
  [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
  Fix doctor deleting orphaned issues attachments (go-gitea#34142)
  [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
  Fix actions skipped commit status indicator (go-gitea#34507)
  Clean up "file-view" related styles (go-gitea#34558)
  Add "View workflow file" to Actions list page (go-gitea#34538)
  Do not mutate incoming options to RenderUserSearch and SearchUsers  (go-gitea#34544)
  Add webhook assigning test and fix possible bug (go-gitea#34420)
  Fix possible nil description of pull request when migrating from CodeCommit (go-gitea#34541)
  Refactor commit reader (go-gitea#34542)
hantang pushed a commit to qundao/mirror-forgejo that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
## Checklist

- [x] go to the last cherry-pick PR (forgejo/forgejo#7965) to figure out how far it went: [gitea@9d4ebc1f2c](go-gitea/gitea@9d4ebc1)
- [x] cherry-pick and open PR (forgejo/forgejo#8040)
- [ ] have the PR pass the CI
- end-to-end (specially important if there are actions related changes)
  - [ ] add `run-end-to-end` label
  - [ ] check the result
- [ ] write release notes
- [ ] assign reviewers
- [ ] 48h later, last call
- merge 1 hour after the last call

## Legend

- ❓ - No decision about the commit has been made.
- 🍒 - The commit has been cherry picked.
- ⏩ - The commit has been skipped.
- 💡 - The commit has been skipped, but should be ported to Forgejo.
- ✍️ - The commit has been skipped, and a port to Forgejo already exists.

## Commits

- 🍒 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@50d9565) -> [`forgejo`](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/c3e6eab73235ac189ca3a36ce2b8ea8d8ad82c81) Add sort option recentclose for issues and pulls ([gitea#34525](go-gitea/gitea#34525))

## TODO

- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@d5bbaee) Retain issue sort type when a keyword search is introduced ([gitea#34559](go-gitea/gitea#34559))
  UI: Small bat might be nice. Test needed? Do we've frontend tests covering the search?
------
- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@82ea238) Always use an empty line to separate the commit message and trailer ([gitea#34512](go-gitea/gitea#34512))
  Needs merge
------
- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@74858dc) Fix line-button issue after file selection in file tree ([gitea#34574](go-gitea/gitea#34574))
  Frontend: Makes it sense to pick/port ui logic in *.ts files?
------
- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@7149c9c) Fix doctor deleting orphaned issues attachments ([gitea#34142](go-gitea/gitea#34142))
  Doctor: seems useful.
------
- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@0cec4b8) Fix actions skipped commit status indicator ([gitea#34507](go-gitea/gitea#34507))
  Actions: Might benefit from additional tests.
------
- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@4cb0c64) Add "View workflow file" to Actions list page ([gitea#34538](go-gitea/gitea#34538))
  Actions: Needs tests
------
- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@b0936f4) Do not mutate incoming options to RenderUserSearch and SearchUsers ([gitea#34544](go-gitea/gitea#34544))
  Nice refactoring but needs manual merge.
------
- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@498088c) Add webhook assigning test and fix possible bug ([gitea#34420](go-gitea/gitea#34420))
  Integrationtest has conflicts needs merge.
------
- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@24a5105) Fix possible nil description of pull request when migrating from CodeCommit ([gitea#34541](go-gitea/gitea#34541))
  Is this relevant to forgejo? Did not find the place to apply this small change.
------
- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@688da55) Split GetLatestCommitStatus as two functions ([gitea#34535](go-gitea/gitea#34535))
  Merge required.
------
- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@ab96912) Don't display error log when .git-blame-ignore-revs doesn't exist ([gitea#34457](go-gitea/gitea#34457))
  Unsure wheter this affects forgejo. Tests missing.
------
- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@11ee7ff) fix: return 201 Created for CreateVariable API responses ([gitea#34517](go-gitea/gitea#34517))
  Actions: This is marked as breaking the api. Pls think about whether this breaking change iss needed & how this impact api-version-increase.
  The corresponding clinet change can be found here: https://gitea.com/gitea/go-sdk/pulls/713/files
------
- 💡 [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@9b295e9) Actions list ([gitea#34530](go-gitea/gitea#34530))
  Actions: Regression from go-gitea/gitea#34337 Part of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7909
------

## Skipped

- ⏩ [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@bb6377d) [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
------
- ⏩ [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@07d802a) [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
------
- ⏩ [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@c6e2093) Clean up "file-view" related styles ([gitea#34558](go-gitea/gitea#34558))

  - gitea ui specific specific
------
- ⏩ [`gitea`](go-gitea/gitea@9f10885) Refactor commit reader ([gitea#34542](go-gitea/gitea#34542))

  - gitea refactor specific
------

<details>
<summary><h2>Stats</h2></summary>

<br>

Between [`gitea@9d4ebc1f2c`](go-gitea/gitea@9d4ebc1) and [`gitea@d5bbaee64e`](go-gitea/gitea@d5bbaee), **18** commits have been reviewed. We picked **1**, skipped **4**, and decided to port **13**.

</details>

Co-authored-by: Markus Amshove <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <[email protected]>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8040
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Michael Jerger <[email protected]>
Co-committed-by: Michael Jerger <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/done All backports for this PR have been created backport/v1.24 This PR should be backported to Gitea 1.24 lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Migration from CodeCommit including PRs causes runtime error
4 participants