Skip to content

Conversation

@donstim
Copy link
Contributor

@donstim donstim commented Aug 21, 2025

Fixes auto-rotation issue if light weight, forward CG (e.g., 2900 kg fuel, no passengers, full forward cargo hold.)

This flight model provides approximately equivalent behavior on both MSFS 2020 and 2024. While in MSFS 2024, it came up a couple of knots short of the margin to auto-rotation compared to MSFS 2020, I don't think it is necessary to introduce any changes for the flight model in MSFS 2024 at this point. This flight model will definitely improve what we currently have for 2024.

Summary of Changes

Screenshots (if necessary)

References

Additional context

Developmental testing included tests at the extremes of the gross weight-cg envelope to confirm that nosewheel liftoff with no pitch input does not occur before VR and that the airplane is able to rotate at VR. This testing was done with the clear weather preset and using what are believed to be conservative, but not necessarily the most critical takeoff speeds. This should provide plenty of margin to autorotation when considering that normal loading of fuel and payload through the EFB usually provides a CG in the 32-33% range, well inside the limits.

Known issue: Pitch trim is a bit too high in CONF 2 and CONF 3 at light weights at F speed.

Discord username (if different from GitHub): donbikes

Testing instructions

Perform takeoffs and landings at various weights and cg conditions. Confirm that no auto-rotation occurs before VR and that flight characteristics are not adversely affected.

How to download the PR for QA

Every new commit to this PR will cause new A32NX and A380X artifacts to be created, built, and uploaded.

  1. Make sure you are signed in to GitHub
  2. Click on the Checks tab on the PR
  3. On the left side, find and click on the PR Build tab
  4. Click on either flybywire-aircraft-a320-neo, flybywire-aircraft-a380-842 (4K) or flybywire-aircraft-a380-842 (8K) download link at the bottom of the page

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🟡 Code Review: Ready for Review in Quality Assurance Aug 21, 2025
@donstim donstim marked this pull request as draft August 21, 2025 06:24
@donstim donstim added Flight Model Anything thats related to the planes performance regarding aerodynamics etc. A32NX Related to the A32NX aircraft QA MSFS 2020 Only This PR affects only the MSFS 2020 version of the aircraft and should only be tested there labels Aug 21, 2025
@donstim donstim marked this pull request as ready for review August 22, 2025 05:11
drag_scalar = 1 ; Scalar coefficient to ponderate global flap drag coef (non dimensioned)
pitch_scalar = 1 ; Scalar coefficient to ponderate global flap pitch coef (non dimensioned)
max_on_ground_position = 5 ; Dynamically set in-tool to last flap-position index by defaut when -1 is found.
flaps-position.0 = 0.00, -1, 0, 0.0 ; CONF 0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add the description for each comma separated value in the comments?
flap position, airspeed limit, drag scalar, lift scalar, area scalar, add camber, add aft feet, add incidence

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure

@donstim donstim marked this pull request as draft August 22, 2025 15:04
@donstim donstim changed the title fix:(a32nx/flight model): A320 flight model update for MSFS 2020 fix:(a32nx/flight model): A320 flight model update Aug 22, 2025
@flogross89 flogross89 added this to the v0.15.0 milestone Oct 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A32NX Related to the A32NX aircraft Flight Model Anything thats related to the planes performance regarding aerodynamics etc. QA MSFS 2020 Only This PR affects only the MSFS 2020 version of the aircraft and should only be tested there

Projects

Status: 🟡 Code Review: Ready for Review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants