Fix transcript editor performance problem #913
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe change updates the seeding logic in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant SeedFunction
participant JSONSource
participant WordList
SeedFunction->>JSONSource: Deserialize JSON to Vec<Word>
JSONSource-->>SeedFunction: Return original word list
SeedFunction->>WordList: Create new vector with 100x capacity
loop 100 times
SeedFunction->>WordList: Clone and append original word list
end
SeedFunction-->>Session: Set words field to extended list
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant SearchAndReplace
participant Editor
User->>SearchAndReplace: Input search term
SearchAndReplace->>SearchAndReplace: Debounce 300ms
SearchAndReplace->>Editor: Set search term (debounced)
alt Replace term condition met
SearchAndReplace->>Editor: Update replace term
end
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Editor
participant SpeakerSplitExtension
User->>Editor: Press Enter key
Editor->>SpeakerSplitExtension: handleKeyDown event
SpeakerSplitExtension->>Editor: Calculate split position at word boundary
SpeakerSplitExtension->>Editor: Dispatch split transaction with new speaker node
Editor->>User: Cursor moves to new speaker node
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (8)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
crates/db-user/src/init.rs (1)
322-332: Optimize the word list repetition logic.The implementation correctly creates a 10x repeated word list for performance testing, but the current approach clones the entire vector 10 times in a loop, which is inefficient.
Consider this more efficient approach:
- words: { - let words = serde_json::from_str::<Vec<hypr_listener_interface::Word>>( - &hypr_data::english_4::WORDS_JSON, - ) - .unwrap(); - let mut repeated = Vec::with_capacity(words.len() * 10); - for _ in 0..10 { - repeated.extend(words.clone()); - } - repeated - }, + words: { + let words = serde_json::from_str::<Vec<hypr_listener_interface::Word>>( + &hypr_data::english_4::WORDS_JSON, + ) + .unwrap(); + words.repeat(10) + },This uses the built-in
repeatmethod which is more concise and avoids multiple cloning operations.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
crates/db-user/src/init.rs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.{js,ts,tsx,rs}`: 1. No error handling. 2. No unused imports, variables, or functions. 3. For comments, keep it minimal. It should be about "Why", not "What".
**/*.{js,ts,tsx,rs}: 1. No error handling.
2. No unused imports, variables, or functions.
3. For comments, keep it minimal. It should be about "Why", not "What".
crates/db-user/src/init.rs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: ci
yujonglee
force-pushed
the
fix-tiptap-performance
branch
from
c9ee9b1 to
6fec6e6
Compare
No description provided.