Skip to content

Mpgd cad sept#986

Open
mposik1983 wants to merge 15 commits intomainfrom
mpgd-cad-sept
Open

Mpgd cad sept#986
mposik1983 wants to merge 15 commits intomainfrom
mpgd-cad-sept

Conversation

@mposik1983
Copy link
Contributor

Briefly, what does this PR introduce?

Update MPGD envelopes to match Sept. CAD model: https://indico.bnl.gov/event/29963/

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bug fix (issue #__)
  • New feature (issue #__)
  • Documentation update
  • Other: Envelope update

Please check if this PR fulfills the following:

  • Tests for the changes have been added
  • Documentation has been added / updated
  • Changes have been communicated to collaborators

Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code?

No breaking changes. MPGD hit locations will be altered and a new material map will need to be generated.

Does this PR change default behavior?

There will be changes in the hit locations of the MPGDs, most notably the MPGD disks as they had changes made to their outer radii and were moved closer to the IP.


<comment> Main parameters for MPGD endcap disks, offset here is the distance between disks </comment>
<constant name="ForwardMPGD_zmin" value="1500.0*mm"/>
<constant name="ForwardMPGD_zmin" value="1285.0*mm"/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could overlap with the silicon disk, check TrackerEndcapPDisk4_zmin

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But it passed the overlap checks in CI.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ShujieL, I ran checkOverlaps script with tolerance set to -t 0.001 in the tracking_only configuration and the only overlaps I saw were from other sub detectors (non-mpgd) overlapping with themselves or beampipe.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well technically there is no "overlap", but check this:
image

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow, that fit nicely in there. How should we proceed in updating the geometry to match the Sep. CAD model? Should we have this PR serve as the Tracking geometry update PR, so silicon and ToF can include their respective changes in this PR and then merge when the tracking system update is completed?

@wdconinc wdconinc removed their request for review January 19, 2026 16:30
veprbl and others added 7 commits March 4, 2026 14:31
@github-actions github-actions bot added topic: barrel Mid-rapidity detectors topic: forward Positive-rapidity detectors (hadron-going side) labels Mar 25, 2026
@veprbl
Copy link
Member

veprbl commented Mar 25, 2026

What is the status of this?

@bschmookler
Copy link
Contributor

The MPGD and SVT positions/sizes are now consistent with the September 2025 CAD envelopes in this PR.

Yann's last update fixed the overlap issue within the MPGD inner barrel detector that was introduced by the change of the envelope's inner radius.

So, I think we are good to merge this and update the material map.

@veprbl
Copy link
Member

veprbl commented Mar 25, 2026

Does anyone approve the PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

topic: barrel Mid-rapidity detectors topic: forward Positive-rapidity detectors (hadron-going side) topic: geometry topic: tracking

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants