[PM-18414] CI restructuring #6 - New build workflows, build-all, ci-bwpm and ci-bwa

[vvolkgang]

🎟️ Tracking

#1566

📔 Objective

New workflows inbound! Summary of changes:

• _build-any.yml as a Callable Workflow exclusively handles building, versioning and workflow triggers were shifted to callers.
• ci-bwpm.yml | ci-bwa.yml files handle both manual builds and CI, by shifting GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER responsibility and manual builds out of _build-any.yml we're able to remove the need to call dispatch-and-download.yml for versions, speeding up builds.
• Split building steps from app level configuration by introducing .env files per build variant - .env.bwpm_prod, .env.bwpm_beta, .env.bwa_prod.
• Leverage fastlane for codebase preparation steps, supporting locally building all current and future build variants. Ruby will now be our go to language for less trivial scripts instead of bash.
• Provides Authenticator all the build related goodies it was missing:
  1. Automatic versioning;
  2. Simulator builds;
  3. Exporting dSym files
  4. Crashlytics config support - filename will be updated in future PR;
  5. CI Build Info support - app will be updated to use this in a future PR;

Note

We'll merge these for manual build testing, On Push triggers will be introduced in a future PR where the existing CI files will be removed, so we don't create builds with conflicting version numbers

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – 0501f809-f4e0-4b01-b790-f126d1446433

Great job, no security vulnerabilities found in this Pull Request

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.06%. Comparing base (4af08d0) to head (7ea8f5f).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1589      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.78%   86.06%   -3.73%     
==========================================
  Files         786      984     +198     
  Lines       49918    59820    +9902     
==========================================
+ Hits        44818    51483    +6665     
- Misses       5100     8337    +3237     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.