Skip to content

[deps]: Lock file maintenance #10

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 12, 2025
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 12, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every 2nd week starting on the 2 week of the year before 4am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner May 12, 2025 01:33
@bitwarden-bot bitwarden-bot changed the title [deps]: Lock file maintenance [PM-21536] [deps]: Lock file maintenance May 12, 2025
@bitwarden-bot
Copy link

Internal tracking:

@renovate renovate bot changed the title [PM-21536] [deps]: Lock file maintenance [deps]: Lock file maintenance May 12, 2025
@withinfocus withinfocus merged commit d64fcb7 into main May 12, 2025
2 checks passed
@withinfocus withinfocus deleted the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch May 12, 2025 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants