Skip to content

Conversation

@WangzJi
Copy link
Contributor

@WangzJi WangzJi commented Jan 5, 2026

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.18%. Comparing base (6160c7d) to head (b2954c3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x    #7915      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.58%   72.18%   +0.59%     
  Complexity      883      883              
============================================
  Files          1294     1294              
  Lines         49554    49554              
  Branches       5884     5884              
============================================
+ Hits          35475    35772     +297     
+ Misses        11155    10854     -301     
- Partials       2924     2928       +4     

see 19 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@WangzJi WangzJi marked this pull request as draft January 5, 2026 08:19
@WangzJi WangzJi marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2026 10:03
@WangzJi WangzJi added the type: test test case label Jan 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type: test test case

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant