Skip to content

Conversation

@andygrove
Copy link
Member

@andygrove andygrove commented Apr 8, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Part of #1630

Rationale for this change

We know it is wrong to ignore the ignoreNulls flag, but we do not have tests for this yet. This PR stops ignoring the flag and does not cause any regressions, so we may as well merge it IMO and then follow up to add tests so that we can close the issue.

We need to figure out what to do about testing these non-deterministic functions in #1646 before we can add tests for ignoreNulls.

What changes are included in this PR?

How are these changes tested?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.74%. Comparing base (f09f8af) to head (3826b82).
Report is 151 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #1626      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     56.12%   58.74%   +2.62%     
- Complexity      976     1081     +105     
============================================
  Files           119      125       +6     
  Lines         11743    12584     +841     
  Branches       2251     2361     +110     
============================================
+ Hits           6591     7393     +802     
- Misses         4012     4018       +6     
- Partials       1140     1173      +33     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@andygrove andygrove marked this pull request as ready for review April 18, 2025 14:49
@andygrove andygrove requested a review from parthchandra April 18, 2025 14:51
@andygrove
Copy link
Member Author

andygrove commented Apr 18, 2025

@anuragmantri fyi, I already had this PR open from a while back. It does not resolve the issue but seems worth merging while we work on figuring out a test approach.

Copy link
Contributor

@parthchandra parthchandra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link

@anuragmantri anuragmantri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@andygrove andygrove merged commit 9eaa169 into apache:main Apr 21, 2025
80 checks passed
@andygrove andygrove deleted the first-last-ignore-nulls branch April 21, 2025 16:39
coderfender pushed a commit to coderfender/datafusion-comet that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants