-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
A game of surface codes demo #1355
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Hey, looks like you've updated some demos! 🐘 Don't forget to update the Please hide this comment once the field(s) are updated. Thanks! |
Thank you for opening this pull request. You can find the built site at this link. Deployment Info:
Note: It may take several minutes for updates to this pull request to be reflected on the deployed site. |
Co-authored-by: cognigami <[email protected]>
@justinpickering I dont know how this got auto-merged despite the failed metadata check. What should I do in this case? |
@doctorperceptron @ashishks0522 - do you happen to know why this happened? Something we should update in the repo's merge settings?
The publish action was ran yesterday after this demo's merge. Changes are live on production. |
The settings say PR should have status checks passed to be able to merge in so I think that's correct 🤔 |
P0 Game of Surface Codes Demo 2025 Q2 [sc-87600]
open question:
do I understand it correct that single X and Z measurements are free, but joint measurements cost 1 🕒?>> yesWhat does it mean that the error probability of the distillation of 15 faulty magic states with$p$ leads to a faulty magic state with probability $35p^3$ , yet, the probability of failure is $(1-p)^n$ ? 🤔>> p is the infidelity of the state, and