Open
Conversation
Member
Author
|
ux^2 etc. should take into account the gamma/(psi+1) factor. Additionally, chi indeed does decrease outside the laser pulse. Both effects are tiny for a0=0.1 but noticeable for a0=1, if the formation of a wake is manually suppressed. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR computes the temperature and chi of electrons created by laser ionization on a grid in the limit of infinitely many particles per cell, without using any particles. Much faster and with no noise compared to using many particles per cell. Assumes that particles are stationary and no plasma wake forms.
Runtimes:
Laser:
Electron temperature:
Refractive index:
constisconst)