-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
[minor_change] Add module aci_port_channel_member_policy to manage port channel member policies (DCNE-310) #762
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[minor_change] Add module aci_port_channel_member_policy to manage port channel member policies (DCNE-310) #762
Conversation
…rt channel member policies
c7cd2d4
to
cea8f5d
Compare
tests/integration/targets/aci_port_channel_member_policy/tasks/main.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
description: | ||
- The priority of the Port Channel Member policy. | ||
- The APIC defaults to C(32768) when not provided. | ||
- The allowed minimum is C(1) and the allowed maximum is C(65535). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've seen a few different ways to describe a valid range in the ansible-aci
collection. There is only one other example like this. Should we use a description that matches most other modules?
- The allowed minimum is C(1) and the allowed maximum is C(65535). | |
- Accepted values range between C(1) and C(65535). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
…y_port_channel_member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
fixes #732