feat: expose udp buffer size option from dnsproxy#8054
Open
ferferga wants to merge 1 commit intoAdguardTeam:beta-v0.107from
Open
feat: expose udp buffer size option from dnsproxy#8054ferferga wants to merge 1 commit intoAdguardTeam:beta-v0.107from
ferferga wants to merge 1 commit intoAdguardTeam:beta-v0.107from
Conversation
![windsurf-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1066231?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Also improved some documentation aspects Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
ferferga
force-pushed
the
expose-udp-buf-size
branch
from
17f9fe8 to
8e62dcc
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In my network, we are having many messages about buffer size too small by dnsproxy. dsnproxy itself has an option to tune the UDP buffer size, but there is no way that can be controlled through AdGuardHome. With this simple PR, it's possible to do so now.
I also took the chance to do some minor documentation improvements by adding a reference to dnsproxy settings to the comments