Confused About ./.. Vs. ..

[fweth]

Hey, I'm confused because ./../foo and ../foo return different results in my case (with relative="path" they are the same). Could it be that only the first case only . is evaluated relative to route and all subsequent symbols, like .., are evaulated relative to path anyway? I find it confusing, as in POSIX ./.. would be equivalent to .. as far as I know?

[fweth]

Ah, I realize that it only applies to the leading .. segments. ./.. seems to be a bit of an edge case that shouldn't be used at all...