We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This is one of the tracking items of the REP: RayCluster status improvement, the step 5 in the design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bRL0cZa87eCX6SI7gqthN68CgmHaB6l3-vJuIse-BrY
We should implement the new HeadReady condition by referring to the current utils.IsRunningAndReady
utils.IsRunningAndReady
kuberay/ray-operator/controllers/ray/rayservice_controller.go
Lines 1211 to 1217 in a43217b
Once the condition is implemented, we should base on it to refactor the isHeadPodRunningAndReady function.
isHeadPodRunningAndReady
No response
ray-project/enhancements#54
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @cchen777, would you like to take on this?
Sorry, something went wrong.
yes @rueian i'd like to take on this !
Closes #2261
rueian
cchen777
No branches or pull requests
Search before asking
Description
This is one of the tracking items of the REP: RayCluster status improvement, the step 5 in the design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bRL0cZa87eCX6SI7gqthN68CgmHaB6l3-vJuIse-BrY
We should implement the new HeadReady condition by referring to the current
utils.IsRunningAndReady
kuberay/ray-operator/controllers/ray/rayservice_controller.go
Lines 1211 to 1217 in a43217b
Once the condition is implemented, we should base on it to refactor the
isHeadPodRunningAndReady
function.Use case
No response
Related issues
ray-project/enhancements#54
Are you willing to submit a PR?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: