Hourly ET

[jacob-r-g]

Is there any way to adapt the library's functions for calculating hourly ET instead of daily?

[mvremec]

Hi Jacob,

We haven't done it yet, but this is definitely on our "To do" list. Which method would you prefer for calculating hourly ET? So far, I've only implemented the FAO-56 and ASCE Penman-Monteith methods for Pandas.Series on a separate private branch. If you're interested, I can share the code with you.

Best,
Matevz

[nnuxdw]

Hello, Can pyet now support the calculation of daily PET? Thanks

[mvremec]

Hi @nnuxdw, Currently, this is not supported yet. Would FAO-56 alone be sufficient for your needs, or do you require support for other methods as well?

[nnuxdw]

Thanks for your fast reply. Actually I'm rerifying a surface-subsurface coupled model to simulate hydrology cycling in a basin, and my ET module runs on hourly time step, which means hourly PET should be an input data. Do you mean FAO-56 can generate hourly PET data? Can I directly use code in testfao56.py or should I do something special? Thanks again.

[jacob-r-g]

Hi Matevz, Thanks for the fast reply and sorry for my delay. FAO-56 is what I was thinking. It would be great to see that code/branch, thanks! Best, Jacob

…

On Mar 23, 2023, 2:32 AM -0700, MatevzVremec ***@***.***>, wrote: Hi Jacob, We haven't done it yet, but this is definitely on our "To do" list. Which method would you prefer for calculating hourly ET? So far, I've only implemented the FAO-56 and ASCE Penman-Monteith methods for Pandas.Series on a separate private branch. If you're interested, I can share the code with you. Best, Matevz — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[nnuxdw]

Thanks for your fast reply. Actually I'm rerifying a surface-subsurface coupled model to simulate hydrology cycling in a basin, and my ET module runs on hourly time step, which means hourly PET should be an input data. Do you mean FAO-56 can generate hourly PET data? Can I directly use code in testfao56.py or should I do something special? Thanks again. At 2024-12-16 17:44:16, "MatevzVremec" ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @nnuxdw, Currently, this is not supported yet. Would FAO-56 alone be sufficient for your needs, or do you require support for other methods as well? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Tomasinjo]

I vote for this as well if it is still on the table.

Hvala za vaše delo.