6-7 hops, what's the point? #278
Replies: 4 comments 5 replies
-
|
In St. Petersburg, we often fail to deliver due to the low hop limit (even 7 is not enough :D) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@Haflinger73 Can you tell more about that caveman99 statement? Maybe you have a link to a video or article? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
With new next-hop routing, I think the limit should be raised or eliminated for packets that travel a next-hop route and enforced for managed-flood packets. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
But from what I understand, next hop routing is for direct messages. For channels, we are still extremely limited by this hop limit. And with 7 hops, I find it hard to believe that this isn't just a toy. Couldn't we take inspiration from Meshcore, adding a form of automatic role assignment (client, client_mute, relay), to have a true long-range mesh network capable of connecting an entire country? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Why can 6 + 7 hops be selected in the LoRa settings at all, when Meshtasic itself says: 3 hops are ideal, 4-5 is OK, 6-7 is only destructive for the mesh. (Statement by Thomas Göttgens/caveman99 at FOSDEM February 2024)
Due to the many valleys and mountains in Switzerland, several routers are required. However, many of them constantly run at the 5% limit.
A lot of traffic is generated by excessively high hop settings. Why do we need 6,7 hops?
Best regards, Haflinger73
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions