RTMPose vs RTMO vs DWPose vs RTMW #3135
Unanswered
davidpagnon
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
I would appreciate it if you could help me understand a few details about RTMPose, RTMO, DWPose, and RTMW.
Some RTMW models have the "dw" suffix: rtmw-dw-x-l_simcc-cocktail14_270e-384x288
Some RTMpose models have the "dw" suffix, and seem to be trained on a less extensive dataset: rtmpose-l_simcc-ucoco_dw-ucoco_270e-384x288
Can you help me understand the logic behind it?
Ex for Coco 17: RTMPose-s: AP 72.2, while RTMPose-s*: AP 69.7
Here is what I found for now:
RTMPose: Top down (detection and then pose estimation).
Supports Halpe26 (with feet)
RTMW: RTMPose for whole-body (face, feet, hands), further extends to 3D
RTMO: One stage (no detection needed).
Faster with more than 4 people, slightly worse accuracy, only 17 points
DWPose: Uses distillation (teacher and student models).
Whole-body, faster than RTMW but less accurate (although not trained on same datasets so AP should be taken with caution)
YOLOX: Similar speed as RTMO but less accurate, no feet
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions