Skip to content

Phase B: Production-Ready GPU Acceleration - Full Implementation #496

New issue
New issue
Closed
#676
Closed
Phase B: Production-Ready GPU Acceleration - Full Implementation#496
#676
@franklinic

Description

@franklinic
franklinic
opened on Nov 17, 2025

Phase B: Production-Ready GPU Acceleration - Full Implementation

🎯 Executive Summary

Phase A Status: ✅ COMPLETE - Architecture validated, all tests passing
Phase B Goal: Production-ready GPU acceleration achieving 10-100x speedup for large operations
Estimated Effort: 80-120 hours over 4-5 weeks
Target Performance: Match or exceed PyTorch/TensorFlow GPU acceleration

📊 Phase A Results (Baseline)

What Was Validated ✅

  • ✅ Execution Engine pattern works (zero constraint cascade)
  • ✅ Runtime type dispatch efficient (< 1ns overhead)
  • ✅ Multi-type support (float, double, decimal)
  • ✅ Vectorization benefits CPU performance (1.05x-1.65x faster)
  • ✅ GPU detection and initialization working (AMD gfx902)

Phase A Prototype Limitations (Expected)

  • ❌ GPU slower than CPU due to:
    • Kernel recompilation every call (~10-100ms overhead)
    • No memory pooling (allocates/deallocates every call)
    • Unnecessary array conversions (ToArray() creates copies)
    • No adaptive execution (uses GPU even for tiny operations)
    • Only float supported (double, int, long need GPU kernels)
    • Only Vector operations (missing Matrix and Tensor)

Phase B will fix ALL these limitations to achieve target performance.

📋 Phase B User Stories

Epic 1: Production-Ready GpuEngine (Week 1: 20-25 hours)

US-GPU-001: Kernel Pre-Compilation and Caching

As a developer using GPU acceleration
I want GPU kernels to be compiled once and cached
So that I avoid 10-100ms recompilation overhead on every operation

Acceptance Criteria:

  • All GPU kernels pre-compiled in GpuEngine constructor
  • Kernel cache uses Dictionary<string, Action<...>> for fast lookup
  • Zero recompilation during runtime operations
  • Benchmark shows <1ms overhead for kernel dispatch
  • Memory usage reasonable (<100MB for all cached kernels)

Technical Details:

// BEFORE (Phase A):
var kernel = _accelerator.LoadAutoGroupedStreamKernel<...>(...);  // 10-100ms!

// AFTER (Phase B):
private readonly Dictionary<string, Action<Index1D, ...>> _kernelCache;

// Constructor:
_kernelCache["Add_float"] = _accelerator.LoadAutoGroupedStreamKernel<...>(...);
_kernelCache["Multiply_float"] = _accelerator.LoadAutoGroupedStreamKernel<...>(...);

// Runtime (< 1ms):
_kernelCache["Add_float"](length, gpuA.View, gpuB.View, gpuResult.View);

Estimated: 4-6 hours
Dependencies: None
Priority: P0 (Critical - biggest performance impact)

US-GPU-002: Memory Buffer Pooling

As a developer performing many GPU operations
I want GPU memory to be reused across operations
So that I avoid costly allocate/deallocate overhead on every call

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Memory pool with size-based buckets (1K, 10K, 100K, 1M, 10M)
  • Rent/return pattern: RentBuffer<T>(size), ReturnBuffer(buffer)
  • Thread-safe implementation (ConcurrentBag or lock-free)
  • Automatic growth when pool exhausted
  • Buffer reset/clear before reuse (prevent data leaks)
  • Benchmark shows 5-10x reduction in allocation overhead

Technical Details:

public class GpuMemoryPool<T> where T : unmanaged
{
    private readonly Dictionary<int, ConcurrentBag<MemoryBuffer1D<T, Stride1D.Dense>>> _pools;

    public MemoryBuffer1D<T, Stride1D.Dense> Rent(int size)
    {
        int bucket = GetBucket(size);
        if (_pools[bucket].TryTake(out var buffer))
            return buffer;
        return _accelerator.Allocate1D<T>(bucket);
    }

    public void Return(MemoryBuffer1D<T, Stride1D.Dense> buffer)
    {
        int bucket = GetBucket(buffer.Length);
        _pools[bucket].Add(buffer);
    }
}

Estimated: 6-8 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-001
Priority: P0 (Critical)

US-GPU-003: Direct Memory Access (Zero-Copy Operations)

As a developer passing vectors to GPU
I want to avoid unnecessary array conversions
So that operations are as fast as possible with minimal overhead

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Vector uses pinned memory when possible
  • Direct memory copy: Vector → GPU (no ToArray())
  • Direct memory copy: GPU → Vector (no intermediate array)
  • Fallback to ToArray() only when pinning not possible
  • Benchmark shows zero-copy is 2-5x faster for large vectors
  • Memory safety ensured (no corruption, no leaks)

Technical Details:

// BEFORE (Phase A):
gpuA.CopyFromCPU(a.ToArray());  // Creates copy!

// AFTER (Phase B):
unsafe
{
    fixed (T* ptr = a.GetInternalArray())
    {
        gpuA.CopyFromCPU(new ReadOnlySpan<T>(ptr, a.Length));  // Zero-copy!
    }
}

Estimated: 4-6 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-002
Priority: P1 (High)

US-GPU-004: Adaptive Execution (Size-Based Thresholds)

As a developer using operations of various sizes
I want small operations to use CPU and large operations to use GPU automatically
So that performance is optimal regardless of operation size

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Benchmark-driven thresholds for each operation
  • Automatic CPU for small operations (< threshold)
  • Automatic GPU for large operations (>= threshold)
  • Thresholds configurable via AiDotNetEngine
  • Thresholds per operation type (Add, Multiply, GEMM, etc.)
  • Benchmark shows optimal performance across all sizes

Technical Details:

public class AdaptiveThresholds
{
    public int VectorAdd { get; set; } = 10000;
    public int VectorMultiply { get; set; } = 10000;
    public int MatrixMultiply { get; set; } = 256;  // 256x256 matrix
    public int Convolution { get; set; } = 1000;  // 1000 input elements
}

public Vector<T> Add<T>(Vector<T> a, Vector<T> b)
{
    if (a.Length < _thresholds.VectorAdd)
        return _cpuFallback.Add(a, b);  // CPU for small

    if (typeof(T) == typeof(float) && SupportsGpu)
        return AddGpu(...);  // GPU for large float

    return _cpuFallback.Add(a, b);  // CPU fallback
}

Benchmark Process:

  1. Run operations from size 100 to 10M
  2. Measure CPU time, GPU time for each size
  3. Find crossover point where GPU becomes faster
  4. Set threshold 10% above crossover for safety margin

Estimated: 3-4 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-001, US-GPU-002
Priority: P1 (High)

US-GPU-005: All Unmanaged Type Support

As a developer using various numeric types
I want GPU acceleration for double, int, long, etc. (not just float)
So that all unmanaged types benefit from GPU acceleration

Acceptance Criteria:

  • GPU kernels for: double, int, long, uint, ulong, short, ushort, byte, sbyte
  • All operations: Add, Subtract, Multiply, Divide, Sqrt, Power, etc.
  • Type-specific optimizations where applicable
  • Comprehensive tests for each type
  • Benchmark shows similar speedup across all types

Technical Details:

// Kernel template for all unmanaged types
public static void AddKernel<T>(Index1D index, ArrayView<T> a, ArrayView<T> b, ArrayView<T> result)
    where T : unmanaged
{
    result[index] = /* T-specific add operation */;
}

// Pre-compile for all types:
_kernelCache["Add_float"] = LoadKernel<float>(...);
_kernelCache["Add_double"] = LoadKernel<double>(...);
_kernelCache["Add_int"] = LoadKernel<int>(...);
// ... etc for all unmanaged types

Estimated: 6-8 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-001
Priority: P1 (High)

US-GPU-006: Comprehensive Error Handling

As a developer using GPU acceleration
I want robust error handling for all failure scenarios
So that my application doesn't crash due to GPU issues

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Handle GPU out of memory gracefully (fallback to CPU)
  • Handle GPU device lost/reset (reinitialize or fallback)
  • Handle unsupported operations (fallback to CPU)
  • Clear error messages for all failure modes
  • Logging for debugging GPU issues
  • Stress tests for all error scenarios

Technical Details:

public Vector<T> Add<T>(Vector<T> a, Vector<T> b)
{
    try
    {
        if (typeof(T) == typeof(float) && SupportsGpu)
        {
            try
            {
                return AddGpu(...);
            }
            catch (OutOfMemoryException ex)
            {
                _logger.Warn("GPU out of memory, falling back to CPU", ex);
                return _cpuFallback.Add(a, b);
            }
            catch (AcceleratorException ex)
            {
                _logger.Error("GPU device error, falling back to CPU", ex);
                _useGpu = false;  // Disable GPU for remainder of session
                return _cpuFallback.Add(a, b);
            }
        }

        return _cpuFallback.Add(a, b);
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        _logger.Error("Unexpected error in Add operation", ex);
        throw;  // Unexpected errors should propagate
    }
}

Estimated: 4-5 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-001 through US-GPU-005
Priority: P1 (High)

Epic 2: Matrix Operations (Week 2: 15-20 hours)

US-GPU-007: GEMM (General Matrix-Matrix Multiply)

As a developer training neural networks
I want GPU-accelerated matrix multiplication
So that dense layer forward/backward passes are 100-1000x faster

Acceptance Criteria:

  • GEMM implementation: C = alpha * A @ B + beta * C
  • Support for transposed matrices (A^T, B^T)
  • Tiled multiplication for efficient memory access
  • Batch GEMM for multiple matrix multiplications
  • Benchmark shows 100-1000x speedup vs CPU for large matrices
  • Integration with existing Matrix class

Technical Details:

// Matrix multiplication kernel with tiling
public static void GemmKernel(
    Index2D index,
    ArrayView2D<float, Stride2D.DenseX> matrixA,
    ArrayView2D<float, Stride2D.DenseX> matrixB,
    ArrayView2D<float, Stride2D.DenseX> matrixC,
    int M, int N, int K)
{
    const int TILE_SIZE = 16;
    var tileA = SharedMemory.Allocate2D<float, Stride2D.DenseX>(TILE_SIZE, TILE_SIZE);
    var tileB = SharedMemory.Allocate2D<float, Stride2D.DenseX>(TILE_SIZE, TILE_SIZE);

    // Tiled matrix multiplication for efficient memory access
    // ...
}

Performance Target:

  • 512x512 matrix: 100-500x faster than CPU
  • 2048x2048 matrix: 500-1000x faster than CPU

Estimated: 8-10 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-001, US-GPU-002
Priority: P0 (Critical for deep learning)

US-GPU-008: GEMV (General Matrix-Vector Multiply)

As a developer performing matrix-vector operations
I want GPU-accelerated matrix-vector multiplication
So that forward passes in neural networks are faster

Acceptance Criteria:

  • GEMV implementation: y = alpha * A @ x + beta * y
  • Support for transposed matrix (A^T)
  • Optimized memory access pattern
  • Benchmark shows 10-50x speedup vs CPU
  • Integration with existing Matrix and Vector

Estimated: 3-4 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-007
Priority: P1 (High)

US-GPU-009: Matrix Transpose

As a developer manipulating matrices
I want GPU-accelerated matrix transpose
So that operations requiring transposed matrices are faster

Acceptance Criteria:

  • In-place transpose for square matrices
  • Out-of-place transpose for non-square matrices
  • Optimized memory access (avoid bank conflicts)
  • Benchmark shows 5-20x speedup vs CPU
  • Integration with existing Matrix

Estimated: 2-3 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-007
Priority: P2 (Medium)

US-GPU-010: Matrix Element-Wise Operations

As a developer performing matrix operations
I want GPU-accelerated element-wise matrix operations
So that activation functions and other operations are faster

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Element-wise: Add, Subtract, Multiply, Divide
  • Element-wise: Sqrt, Power, Exp, Log
  • Element-wise: Sin, Cos, Tan, Tanh, Sigmoid, ReLU
  • Benchmark shows 10-50x speedup vs CPU for large matrices
  • Integration with existing Matrix

Estimated: 4-5 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-007
Priority: P1 (High)

Epic 3: Tensor Operations (Week 3: 25-35 hours)

US-GPU-011: Conv2D (2D Convolution)

As a developer training convolutional neural networks
I want GPU-accelerated 2D convolution
So that CNN training is 50-500x faster

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Conv2D implementation: output[b,h,w,c] = sum(input[...] * kernel[...])
  • Support for: stride, padding, dilation
  • Optimized im2col or Winograd algorithm
  • Batch support (multiple images)
  • Benchmark shows 50-500x speedup vs CPU
  • Integration with existing Tensor class

Technical Details:

// Conv2D kernel (im2col approach)
public static void Conv2DKernel(
    Index3D index,  // (batch, output_height, output_width)
    ArrayView<float> input,
    ArrayView<float> kernel,
    ArrayView<float> output,
    int inputHeight, int inputWidth, int inputChannels,
    int kernelHeight, int kernelWidth,
    int outputHeight, int outputWidth, int outputChannels,
    int stride, int padding)
{
    // Efficient convolution using im2col or Winograd
    // ...
}

Performance Target:

  • 224x224x64 input: 50-200x faster than CPU
  • 512x512x128 input: 100-500x faster than CPU

Estimated: 12-15 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-007 (GEMM for im2col)
Priority: P0 (Critical for CNNs)

US-GPU-012: MaxPool2D / AvgPool2D (2D Pooling)

As a developer training CNNs
I want GPU-accelerated pooling operations
So that CNN forward/backward passes are faster

Acceptance Criteria:

  • MaxPool2D implementation with index tracking (for backprop)
  • AvgPool2D implementation
  • Support for: pool size, stride, padding
  • Batch support (multiple images)
  • Benchmark shows 20-100x speedup vs CPU
  • Integration with existing Tensor

Estimated: 5-7 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-011
Priority: P1 (High for CNNs)

US-GPU-013: BatchMatMul (Batched Matrix Multiplication)

As a developer training transformers/attention models
I want GPU-accelerated batched matrix multiplication
So that attention mechanisms are 100-500x faster

Acceptance Criteria:

  • BatchMatMul: C[i] = A[i] @ B[i] for all i in batch
  • Support for transposed matrices in batch
  • Efficient memory layout for batch operations
  • Benchmark shows 100-500x speedup vs CPU for large batches
  • Integration with existing Tensor

Estimated: 6-8 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-007 (GEMM)
Priority: P1 (High for transformers)

US-GPU-014: Tensor Element-Wise Operations

As a developer manipulating tensors
I want GPU-accelerated element-wise tensor operations
So that activation functions and other operations are faster

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Element-wise: Add, Subtract, Multiply, Divide
  • Element-wise: Sqrt, Power, Exp, Log
  • Element-wise: Activation functions (ReLU, Sigmoid, Tanh, Softmax)
  • Broadcasting support (different tensor shapes)
  • Benchmark shows 10-50x speedup vs CPU
  • Integration with existing Tensor

Estimated: 6-8 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-011
Priority: P1 (High)

Epic 4: Integration and Optimization (Weeks 4-5: 30-40 hours)

US-GPU-015: Refactor Optimizers to Use Vectorized Operations

As a developer training models
I want all optimizers to use GPU-accelerated operations
So that optimizer updates are 10-100x faster

Acceptance Criteria:

  • AdamOptimizer: Refactor to use PrototypeVector pattern
  • SGD: Refactor to use vectorized operations
  • RMSProp: Refactor to use vectorized operations
  • Adagrad: Refactor to use vectorized operations
  • All optimizers: Remove for-loops, use Vector operations
  • Benchmark shows 10-100x speedup for large parameter vectors
  • All existing tests pass with new implementation

Technical Details:

// BEFORE (current):
for (int i = 0; i < length; i++)
    m[i] = m[i] * beta1 + gradient[i] * (1 - beta1);

// AFTER (vectorized):
_m = AiDotNetEngine.Current.Multiply(_m, _beta1)
    .Add(AiDotNetEngine.Current.Multiply(gradient, _oneMinusBeta1));

Estimated: 12-15 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-001 through US-GPU-006
Priority: P0 (Critical)

US-GPU-016: Refactor Neural Network Layers to Use Matrix Operations

As a developer training neural networks
I want all layers to use GPU-accelerated matrix operations
So that forward/backward passes are 100-1000x faster

Acceptance Criteria:

  • DenseLayer: Use GEMM for forward/backward
  • ConvolutionalLayer: Use Conv2D for forward/backward
  • PoolingLayer: Use MaxPool2D/AvgPool2D
  • BatchNormLayer: Use vectorized operations
  • All layers: Remove for-loops, use Matrix/Tensor operations
  • Benchmark shows 100-1000x speedup for large networks
  • All existing tests pass with new implementation

Estimated: 15-20 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-007 through US-GPU-014
Priority: P0 (Critical)

US-GPU-017: Performance Benchmarking vs PyTorch/TensorFlow

As a developer choosing a deep learning framework
I want to see AiDotNet GPU performance compared to industry leaders
So that I can make informed decisions

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Benchmark suite comparing AiDotNet vs PyTorch vs TensorFlow
  • Operations tested: GEMM, Conv2D, Adam optimizer, full training loop
  • Network architectures tested: MLP, CNN, Transformer (small)
  • Results documented in BENCHMARKS.md
  • Target: Match or exceed PyTorch/TensorFlow on comparable hardware
  • Identify and fix any performance gaps

Benchmark Categories:

  1. Micro-benchmarks: Individual operations (GEMM, Conv2D, etc.)
  2. Macro-benchmarks: Full training loops (MNIST, CIFAR-10)
  3. Memory efficiency: Peak memory usage comparison
  4. Throughput: Images/second, tokens/second

Estimated: 6-8 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-015, US-GPU-016
Priority: P1 (High)

US-GPU-018: Stress Testing and Memory Leak Detection

As a developer running long training jobs
I want GPU acceleration to be stable and leak-free
So that my training doesn't crash or slow down over time

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Stress test: 24+ hour continuous GPU operation
  • Memory leak detection: No memory growth over time
  • Memory profiler integration (dotMemory or similar)
  • GPU memory leak detection (check _accelerator memory)
  • Thread safety validation under concurrent load
  • All stress tests pass without crashes or degradation

Stress Test Scenarios:

  1. Continuous training for 24+ hours
  2. Repeated allocate/deallocate cycles (10M+ iterations)
  3. Concurrent operations from multiple threads
  4. GPU memory exhaustion recovery
  5. Device reset recovery

Estimated: 4-6 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-015, US-GPU-016
Priority: P1 (High)

US-GPU-019: Thread Safety and Concurrent Operations

As a developer using multi-threaded training
I want GPU operations to be thread-safe
So that I can safely parallelize my workloads

Acceptance Criteria:

  • GpuEngine is thread-safe for concurrent operations
  • Memory pool is thread-safe (ConcurrentBag or locks)
  • Kernel cache is thread-safe (readonly after initialization)
  • Accelerator synchronization handled correctly
  • Stress tests with 100+ concurrent threads pass
  • No race conditions, deadlocks, or data corruption

Technical Details:

public class GpuEngine : IEngine
{
    private readonly object _syncLock = new object();

    public Vector<T> Add<T>(Vector<T> a, Vector<T> b)
    {
        lock (_syncLock)  // Or use async locks for better concurrency
        {
            // GPU operation
            _accelerator.Synchronize();  // Ensure completion
            return result;
        }
    }
}

Estimated: 4-5 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-002 (memory pool), US-GPU-001 (kernel cache)
Priority: P1 (High)

US-GPU-020: GPU Device Loss Recovery

As a developer running GPU workloads
I want automatic recovery when GPU device is lost
So that my application continues working (on CPU or reinitialized GPU)

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Detect GPU device loss/reset
  • Attempt to reinitialize GPU device
  • Fallback to CPU if reinitialization fails
  • Log clear messages about device loss and recovery
  • Stress tests that simulate device loss pass
  • No data corruption or crashes during recovery

Estimated: 3-4 hours
Dependencies: US-GPU-006 (error handling)
Priority: P2 (Medium)

📈 Success Criteria

Performance Targets (Must Achieve)

  • ✅ Vector Operations: 10-100x GPU speedup for large vectors (>100K elements)
  • ✅ Matrix Multiplication (GEMM): 100-1000x GPU speedup for large matrices (>512x512)
  • ✅ Convolution (Conv2D): 50-500x GPU speedup for typical CNN inputs
  • ✅ Optimizer Updates: 10-100x GPU speedup for large parameter vectors (>1M params)
  • ✅ Zero Overhead: CPU fallback has <1% overhead vs current implementation

Correctness Targets (Must Achieve)

  • ✅ All existing tests pass with GPU acceleration enabled
  • ✅ Numerical accuracy within floating-point tolerance (< 1e-6 for float, < 1e-12 for double)
  • ✅ All numeric types supported (float, double, decimal, BigInteger, custom)
  • ✅ No crashes, memory leaks, or data corruption

Stability Targets (Must Achieve)

  • ✅ 24+ hour stress tests pass without degradation
  • ✅ Memory usage stable (no leaks)
  • ✅ Thread-safe for concurrent operations
  • ✅ GPU device loss recovery works
  • ✅ Graceful fallback on GPU memory exhaustion

Usability Targets (Must Achieve)

  • ✅ Zero API changes (existing code works unchanged)
  • ✅ Opt-in GPU: AiDotNetEngine.AutoDetectAndConfigureGpu()
  • ✅ Clear documentation with examples
  • ✅ Performance guidelines for users

🛠️ Technical Architecture

Component Hierarchy

AiDotNetEngine (Singleton)
  ├─ IEngine (Interface)
  │   ├─ CpuEngine (Fallback)
  │   └─ GpuEngine (ILGPU)
  │       ├─ KernelCache (Pre-compiled kernels)
  │       ├─ MemoryPool (Rent/return buffers)
  │       └─ AdaptiveThresholds (Size-based routing)
  │
  ├─ Vector<T> Operations
  ├─ Matrix<T> Operations
  └─ Tensor<T> Operations

Memory Flow (Zero-Copy)

User Code
  ↓
Vector<T> (Pinned Memory)
  ↓ (Direct Copy, No ToArray)
GPU Buffer (From Pool)
  ↓
GPU Kernel Execution
  ↓ (Direct Copy, No Intermediate Array)
Vector<T> Result
  ↓
User Code

Decision Flow (Adaptive Execution)

Operation Request
  ↓
Size Check
  ├─ Small (< Threshold) → CPU Engine → Fast Result
  └─ Large (>= Threshold) → Type Check
      ├─ Unmanaged Type → GPU Engine → Fast Result
      └─ Managed Type → CPU Engine → Correct Result

📅 Implementation Timeline

Week 1: Production-Ready GpuEngine (20-25 hours)

  • Days 1-2: US-GPU-001 (Kernel caching), US-GPU-002 (Memory pooling)
  • Days 3-4: US-GPU-003 (Zero-copy), US-GPU-004 (Adaptive execution)
  • Day 5: US-GPU-005 (All unmanaged types), US-GPU-006 (Error handling)

Week 2: Matrix Operations (15-20 hours)

  • Days 1-2: US-GPU-007 (GEMM implementation)
  • Day 3: US-GPU-008 (GEMV), US-GPU-009 (Transpose)
  • Day 4: US-GPU-010 (Matrix element-wise)

Week 3: Tensor Operations (25-35 hours)

  • Days 1-3: US-GPU-011 (Conv2D implementation)
  • Day 4: US-GPU-012 (Pooling), US-GPU-013 (BatchMatMul)
  • Day 5: US-GPU-014 (Tensor element-wise)

Week 4: Integration (15-20 hours)

  • Days 1-3: US-GPU-015 (Refactor optimizers)
  • Days 4-5: US-GPU-016 (Refactor layers)

Week 5: Testing and Optimization (15-20 hours)

  • Days 1-2: US-GPU-017 (Performance benchmarking)
  • Day 3: US-GPU-018 (Stress testing), US-GPU-019 (Thread safety)
  • Day 4: US-GPU-020 (Device recovery), Final polish
  • Day 5: Documentation, Release notes

🧪 Testing Strategy

Unit Tests (Required for Each User Story)

  • Test CPU fallback works correctly
  • Test GPU operations produce correct results
  • Test all numeric types (float, double, int, etc.)
  • Test edge cases (empty vectors, size 1, very large)
  • Test error conditions (out of memory, invalid input)

Integration Tests (Required for Epics)

  • Test full training loop with GPU acceleration
  • Test optimizer convergence with GPU
  • Test neural network training (MLP, CNN)
  • Test numerical accuracy vs CPU implementation

Performance Tests (Required for Phase B)

  • Benchmark all operations (Vector, Matrix, Tensor)
  • Compare vs PyTorch/TensorFlow
  • Validate 10-100x speedup targets achieved
  • Memory usage profiling

Stress Tests (Required Before Release)

  • 24+ hour continuous operation
  • 10M+ allocate/deallocate cycles
  • 100+ concurrent threads
  • GPU memory exhaustion scenarios
  • Device reset/loss scenarios

📚 Documentation Requirements

User Documentation

  • Getting Started Guide: How to enable GPU acceleration
  • Performance Guide: When to use GPU vs CPU
  • API Reference: All GPU-related methods documented
  • Examples: Sample code for common scenarios
  • Troubleshooting: Common issues and solutions

Developer Documentation

  • Architecture Overview: How GPU acceleration works
  • Kernel Development: How to add new GPU operations
  • Performance Tuning: How to optimize GPU operations
  • Testing Guide: How to test GPU operations
  • Contribution Guide: How to contribute GPU features

Benchmark Documentation

  • BENCHMARKS.md: Performance comparison vs PyTorch/TensorFlow
  • Hardware Requirements: GPU requirements and recommendations
  • Performance Data: Detailed benchmark results by operation
  • Speedup Charts: Visual representation of GPU benefits

🔧 Development Tools and Dependencies

Required Tools

  • ILGPU: 1.5.3+ (GPU acceleration library)
  • dotMemory: Memory profiling and leak detection
  • BenchmarkDotNet: Performance benchmarking
  • xUnit: Unit testing framework
  • GitVersion: Semantic versioning

Optional Tools

  • NVIDIA Nsight: GPU profiling (NVIDIA GPUs)
  • AMD Radeon GPU Profiler: GPU profiling (AMD GPUs)
  • JetBrains Rider: IDE with excellent GPU debugging

Hardware Requirements

  • Minimum: Any CUDA or OpenCL compatible GPU
  • Recommended: NVIDIA RTX 3060+ or AMD RX 6600+
  • Testing: Should test on both NVIDIA and AMD GPUs

🚀 Deployment and Release

Release Checklist

  • All user stories completed and tested
  • All tests passing (unit, integration, performance, stress)
  • Performance targets achieved (10-100x speedup)
  • Documentation complete and reviewed
  • Benchmarks published and validated
  • Breaking changes documented (if any)
  • Migration guide created (if needed)
  • NuGet package updated with GPU dependencies

Version Numbering

  • Phase A (Current): 0.0.5-preview (prototype)
  • Phase B (Target): 0.1.0-beta (production-ready GPU)
  • Phase C (Future): 1.0.0 (stable release with GPU)

Backward Compatibility

  • ✅ No breaking changes: All existing code works unchanged
  • ✅ Opt-in GPU: Users must explicitly enable GPU acceleration
  • ✅ CPU fallback: GPU disabled by default, CPU always works
  • ✅ Graceful degradation: If GPU fails, CPU takes over

📊 Risk Assessment and Mitigation

Technical Risks

Risk 1: GPU Performance Not Meeting Targets

Likelihood: Low (Phase A validates architecture)
Impact: High (main goal of project)
Mitigation:

  • Phase A prototype validates approach
  • Benchmark early and often
  • Profile GPU operations to find bottlenecks
  • Implement adaptive execution to guarantee no slowdown

Risk 2: Memory Leaks or Instability

Likelihood: Medium (GPU programming is complex)
Impact: High (blocks production use)
Mitigation:

  • Comprehensive stress testing (24+ hours)
  • Memory profiling with dotMemory
  • Automated leak detection in CI/CD
  • Conservative memory pooling strategy

Risk 3: GPU Device Compatibility Issues

Likelihood: Medium (many GPU vendors/models)
Impact: Medium (users can fallback to CPU)
Mitigation:

  • Test on multiple GPU vendors (NVIDIA, AMD, Intel)
  • Graceful fallback to CPU always available
  • Clear error messages for unsupported hardware
  • Document tested GPU models

Risk 4: Numerical Accuracy Differences

Likelihood: Low (ILGPU uses same FPU operations)
Impact: High (correctness is critical)
Mitigation:

  • Comprehensive accuracy tests (tolerance < 1e-6)
  • Compare GPU results vs CPU results
  • Test edge cases (very small/large numbers)
  • Use double precision where accuracy critical

🎯 Definition of Done (Phase B)

Phase B is considered COMPLETE when:

  1. ✅ All 20 User Stories: Completed and accepted
  2. ✅ All Tests Passing: Unit, integration, performance, stress
  3. ✅ Performance Targets Met: 10-100x speedup for large operations
  4. ✅ Benchmarks Published: BENCHMARKS.md with PyTorch/TensorFlow comparison
  5. ✅ Documentation Complete: User guide, API reference, examples
  6. ✅ Stress Tests Pass: 24+ hour continuous operation without issues
  7. ✅ No Memory Leaks: Confirmed by memory profiler
  8. ✅ Thread Safety Validated: Concurrent stress tests pass
  9. ✅ GPU Device Recovery Works: Graceful handling of device loss
  10. ✅ Zero Breaking Changes: All existing code works unchanged

💡 Future Enhancements (Phase C and Beyond)

Potential Phase C Features

  • Multi-GPU Support: Distribute operations across multiple GPUs
  • Mixed Precision Training: FP16 for faster training with maintained accuracy
  • Gradient Checkpointing: Trade compute for memory in large models
  • Distributed Training: Multi-node GPU training
  • Custom Kernel API: Allow users to write custom GPU kernels
  • TPU Support: Google TPU acceleration (requires different approach)
  • WebGPU Support: GPU acceleration in web browsers (Blazor WASM)

Performance Optimizations

  • Kernel Fusion: Combine multiple operations into single kernel
  • Memory Layout Optimization: NCHW vs NHWC for better cache locality
  • Asynchronous Execution: Overlap CPU and GPU operations
  • Persistent Kernels: Keep kernels running for reduced launch overhead

📞 Contact and Support

  • Questions: Open GitHub Discussion
  • Bugs: Open GitHub Issue with "gpu" label
  • Performance Issues: Open GitHub Issue with "performance" label
  • Documentation Gaps: Open GitHub Issue with "documentation" label

📄 Related Documents

Phase B represents the culmination of GPU acceleration work, transforming AiDotNet into a high-performance deep learning framework that can compete with PyTorch and TensorFlow.

Estimated Total Effort: 80-120 hours over 4-5 weeks
Expected Outcome: 10-100x GPU speedup for large operations, production-ready stability
Target Release: 0.1.0-beta

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions