{{ header }}
In pandas, User-Defined Functions (UDFs) provide a way to extend the library’s functionality by allowing users to apply custom computations to their data. While pandas comes with a set of built-in functions for data manipulation, UDFs offer flexibility when built-in methods are not sufficient. These functions can be applied at different levels: element-wise, row-wise, column-wise, or group-wise, and behave differently, depending on the method used.
Here’s a simple example to illustrate a UDF applied to a Series:
.. ipython:: python s = pd.Series([1, 2, 3]) # Simple UDF that adds 1 to a value def add_one(x): return x + 1 # Apply the function element-wise using .map s.map(add_one)
While UDFs provide flexibility, they come with significant drawbacks, primarily related to performance and behavior. When using UDFs, pandas must perform inference on the result, and that inference could be incorrect. Furthermore, unlike vectorized operations, UDFs are slower because pandas can't optimize their computations, leading to inefficient processing.
Note
In general, most tasks can and should be accomplished using pandas’ built-in methods or vectorized operations.
Despite their drawbacks, UDFs can be helpful when:
- Custom Computations Are Needed: Implementing complex logic or domain-specific calculations that pandas' built-in methods cannot handle.
- Extending pandas' Functionality: Applying external libraries or specialized algorithms unavailable in pandas.
- Handling Complex Grouped Operations: Performing operations on grouped data that standard methods do not support.
For example:
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
# Sample data
df = pd.DataFrame({
'group': ['A', 'A', 'A', 'B', 'B', 'B'],
'x': [1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3],
'y': [2, 4, 6, 1, 2, 1.5]
})
# Function to fit a model to each group
def fit_model(group):
model = LinearRegression()
model.fit(group[['x']], group['y'])
group['y_pred'] = model.predict(group[['x']])
return group
result = df.groupby('group').apply(fit_model)
User-Defined Functions can be applied across various pandas methods:
Method | Function Input | Function Output | Description |
---|---|---|---|
:ref:`udf.map` | Scalar | Scalar | Apply a function to each element |
:ref:`udf.apply` (axis=0) | Column (Series) | Column (Series) | Apply a function to each column |
:ref:`udf.apply` (axis=1) | Row (Series) | Row (Series) | Apply a function to each row |
:ref:`udf.pipe` | Series or DataFrame | Series or DataFrame | Chain functions together to apply to Series or Dataframe |
:ref:`udf.filter` | Series or DataFrame | Boolean | Only accepts UDFs in group by. Function is called for each group, and the group is removed from the result if the function returns False |
:ref:`udf.agg` | Series or DataFrame | Scalar or Series | Aggregate and summarizes values, e.g., sum or custom reducer |
:ref:`udf.transform` (axis=0) | Column (Series) | Column (Series) | Same as :meth:`apply` with (axis=0), but it raises an exception if the function changes the shape of the data |
:ref:`udf.transform` (axis=1) | Row (Series) | Row (Series) | Same as :meth:`apply` with (axis=1), but it raises an exception if the function changes the shape of the data |
When applying UDFs in pandas, it is essential to select the appropriate method based on your specific task. Each method has its strengths and is designed for different use cases. Understanding the purpose and behavior of each method will help you make informed decisions, ensuring more efficient and maintainable code.
Note
Some of these methods are can also be applied to groupby, resample, and various window objects. See :ref:`groupby`, :ref:`resample()<timeseries>`, :ref:`rolling()<window>`, :ref:`expanding()<window>`, and :ref:`ewm()<window>` for details.
The :meth:`map` method is used specifically to apply element-wise UDFs. This means the function
will be called for each element in the Series
or DataFrame
, with the individual value or
the cell as the function argument.
.. ipython:: python temperature_celsius = pd.DataFrame({ "NYC": [14, 21, 23], "Los Angeles": [22, 28, 31], }) def to_fahrenheit(value): return value * (9 / 5) + 32 temperature_celsius.map(to_fahrenheit)
In this example, the function to_fahrenheit
will be called 6 times, once for each value
in the DataFrame
. And the result of each call will be returned in the corresponding cell
of the resulting DataFrame
.
In general, map
will be slow, as it will not make use of vectorization. Instead, a Python
function call for each value will be required, which will slow down things significantly if
working with medium or large data.
When to use: Use :meth:`map` for applying element-wise UDFs to DataFrames or Series.
The :meth:`apply` method allows you to apply UDFs for a whole column or row. This is different from :meth:`map` in that the function will be called for each column (or row), not for each individual value.
.. ipython:: python temperature_celsius = pd.DataFrame({ "NYC": [14, 21, 23], "Los Angeles": [22, 28, 31], }) def to_fahrenheit(column): return column * (9 / 5) + 32 temperature_celsius.apply(to_fahrenheit)
In the example, to_fahrenheit
will be called only twice, as opposed to the 6 times with :meth:`map`.
This will be faster than using :meth:`map`, since the operations for each column are vectorized, and the
overhead of iterating over data in Python and calling Python functions is significantly reduced.
In some cases, the function may require all the data to be able to compute the result. So :meth:`apply` is needed, since with :meth:`map` the function can only access one element at a time.
.. ipython:: python temperature = pd.DataFrame({ "NYC": [14, 21, 23], "Los Angeles": [22, 28, 31], }) def normalize(column): return column / column.mean() temperature.apply(normalize)
In the example, the normalize
function needs to compute the mean of the whole column in order
to divide each element by it. So, we cannot call the function for each element, but we need the
function to receive the whole column.
:meth:`apply` can also execute function by row, by specifying axis=1
.
.. ipython:: python temperature = pd.DataFrame({ "NYC": [14, 21, 23], "Los Angeles": [22, 28, 31], }) def hotter(row): return row["Los Angeles"] - row["NYC"] temperature.apply(hotter, axis=1)
In the example, the function hotter
will be called 3 times, once for each row. And each
call will receive the whole row as the argument, allowing computations that require more than
one value in the row.
apply
is also available for :meth:`SeriesGroupBy.apply`, :meth:`DataFrameGroupBy.apply`,
:meth:`Rolling.apply`, :meth:`Expanding.apply` and :meth:`Resampler.apply`. You can read more
about apply
in groupby operations :ref:`groupby.apply`.
When to use: :meth:`apply` is suitable when no alternative vectorized method or UDF method is available, but consider optimizing performance with vectorized operations wherever possible.
The pipe
method is similar to map
and apply
, but the function receives the whole Series
or DataFrame
it is called on.
.. ipython:: python temperature = pd.DataFrame({ "NYC": [14, 21, 23], "Los Angeles": [22, 28, 31], }) def normalize(df): return df / df.mean().mean() temperature.pipe(normalize)
This is equivalent to calling the normalize
function with the DataFrame
as the parameter.
.. ipython:: python normalize(temperature)
The main advantage of using pipe
is readability. It allows method chaining and clearer code when
calling multiple functions.
.. ipython:: python temperature_celsius = pd.DataFrame({ "NYC": [14, 21, 23], "Los Angeles": [22, 28, 31], }) def multiply_by_9(value): return value * 9 def divide_by_5(value): return value / 5 def add_32(value): return value + 32 # Without `pipe`: fahrenheit = add_32(divide_by_5(multiply_by_9(temperature_celsius))) # With `pipe`: fahrenheit = (temperature_celsius.pipe(multiply_by_9) .pipe(divide_by_5) .pipe(add_32))
pipe
is also available for :meth:`SeriesGroupBy.pipe`, :meth:`DataFrameGroupBy.pipe` and
:meth:`Resampler.pipe`. You can read more about pipe
in groupby operations in :ref:`groupby.pipe`.
When to use: Use :meth:`pipe` when you need to create a pipeline of operations and want to keep the code readable and maintainable.
The filter
method is used to select a subset of rows that match certain criteria.
:meth:`Series.filter` and :meth:`DataFrame.filter` do not support user defined functions,
but :meth:`SeriesGroupBy.filter` and :meth:`DataFrameGroupBy.filter` do. You can read more
about filter
in groupby operations in :ref:`groupby.filter`.
The agg
method is used to aggregate a set of data points into a single one.
The most common aggregation functions such as min
, max
, mean
, sum
, etc.
are already implemented in pandas. agg
allows to implement other custom aggregate
functions.
.. ipython:: python temperature = pd.DataFrame({ "NYC": [14, 21, 23], "Los Angeles": [22, 28, 31], }) def highest_jump(column): return column.pct_change().max() temperature.agg(highest_jump)
When to use: Use :meth:`agg` for performing custom aggregations, where the operation returns a scalar value on each input.
The transform`
method is similar to an aggregation, with the difference that the result is broadcasted
to the original data.
.. ipython:: python temperature = pd.DataFrame({ "NYC": [14, 21, 23], "Los Angeles": [22, 28, 31]}, index=pd.date_range("2000-01-01", "2000-01-03")) def warm_up_all_days(column): return pd.Series(column.max(), index=column.index) temperature.transform(warm_up_all_days)
In the example, the warm_up_all_days
function computes the max
like an aggregation, but instead
of returning just the maximum value, it returns a DataFrame
with the same shape as the original one
with the values of each day replaced by the maximum temperature of the city.
transform
is also available for :meth:`SeriesGroupBy.transform`, :meth:`DataFrameGroupBy.transform` and
:meth:`Resampler.transform`, where it's more common. You can read more about transform
in groupby
operations in :ref:`groupby.transform`.
When to use: When you need to perform an aggregation that will be returned in the original structure of the DataFrame.
While UDFs provide flexibility, their use is generally discouraged as they can introduce
performance issues, especially when written in pure Python. To improve efficiency,
consider using built-in NumPy
or pandas
functions instead of UDFs
for common operations.
Note
If performance is critical, explore vectorized operations before resorting to UDFs.
Below is a comparison of using UDFs versus using Vectorized Operations:
# User-defined function
def calc_ratio(row):
return 100 * (row["one"] / row["two"])
df["new_col"] = df.apply(calc_ratio, axis=1)
# Vectorized Operation
df["new_col2"] = 100 * (df["one"] / df["two"])
Measuring how long each operation takes:
User-defined function: 5.6435 secs
Vectorized: 0.0043 secs
Vectorized operations in pandas are significantly faster than using :meth:`DataFrame.apply`
with UDFs because they leverage highly optimized C functions
via NumPy
to process entire arrays at once. This approach avoids the overhead of looping
through rows in Python and making separate function calls for each row, which is slow and
inefficient. Additionally, NumPy
arrays benefit from memory efficiency and CPU-level
optimizations, making vectorized operations the preferred choice whenever possible.
In scenarios where UDFs are necessary, there are still ways to mitigate their performance drawbacks. One approach is to use Numba, a Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler that can significantly speed up numerical Python code by compiling Python functions to optimized machine code at runtime.
By annotating your UDFs with @numba.jit
, you can achieve performance closer to vectorized operations,
especially for computationally heavy tasks.
Note
You may also refer to the user guide on Enhancing performance for a more detailed guide to using Numba.
Using :meth:`DataFrame.pipe` for Composable Logic
Another useful pattern for improving readability and composability, especially when mixing vectorized logic with UDFs, is to use the :meth:`DataFrame.pipe` method.
:meth:`DataFrame.pipe` doesn't improve performance directly, but it enables cleaner method chaining by passing the entire object into a function. This is especially helpful when chaining custom transformations:
def add_ratio_column(df):
df["ratio"] = 100 * (df["one"] / df["two"])
return df
df = (
df
.query("one > 0")
.pipe(add_ratio_column)
.dropna()
)
This is functionally equivalent to calling add_ratio_column(df)
, but keeps your code
clean and composable. The function you pass to :meth:`DataFrame.pipe` can use vectorized operations,
row-wise UDFs, or any other logic; :meth:`DataFrame.pipe` is agnostic.
Note
While :meth:`DataFrame.pipe` does not improve performance on its own, it promotes clean, modular design and allows both vectorized and UDF-based logic to be composed in method chains.