Merge pull request #1888 from Violet-Bora-Lee/master

minor fixes

Author: iliakan

1-js/04-object-basics/07-optional-chaining/article.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 [recent browser="new"]
 
-The optional chaining `?.` is an error-prone way to access nested object properties, even if an intermediate property doesn't exist.
+The optional chaining `?.` is an error-proof way to access nested object properties, even if an intermediate property doesn't exist.
 
 ## The problem
 
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ AND'ing the whole path to the property ensures that all components exist, but is
 
 The optional chaining `?.` stops the evaluation and returns `undefined` if the part before `?.` is `undefined` or `null`.
 
-Further in this article, for brewity, we'll be saying that something "exists" if it's not `null` and not `undefined`.
+Further in this article, for brevity, we'll be saying that something "exists" if it's not `null` and not `undefined`.
 
 
 Here's the safe way to access `user.address.street`:

2-ui/2-events/05-dispatch-events/article.md

@@ -243,9 +243,9 @@ The output order is: 1 -> nested -> 2.
 
 Please note that the nested event `menu-open` is caught on the `document`. The propagation and handling of the nested event is finished before the processing gets back to the outer code (`onclick`).
 
-That's not only about `dispatchEvent`, there are other cases. If an event handler calls methods that trigger to other events -- they are too processed synchronously, in a nested fasion.
+That's not only about `dispatchEvent`, there are other cases. If an event handler calls methods that trigger to other events -- they are too processed synchronously, in a nested fashion.
 
-Let's say we don't like it. We'd want `onclick` to be fully processed first, independantly from `menu-open` or any other nested events.
+Let's say we don't like it. We'd want `onclick` to be fully processed first, independently from `menu-open` or any other nested events.
 
 Then we can either put the `dispatchEvent` (or another event-triggering call) at the end of `onclick` or, maybe better, wrap it in the zero-delay `setTimeout`: