Check compatibility level with Jetbrains Junie Pro

[jabrena]

• 100-java-checklist-guide.mdc
• 110-java-maven-best-practices.mdc
• 111-java-maven-dependencies.mdc
• 112-java-maven-plugins.mdc
• 113-java-maven-documentation.mdc
• 121-java-object-oriented-design.mdc
• 122-java-type-design.mdc <- Limited to one class, not the whole package.
• 123-java-general-guidelines.mdc
• 124-java-secure-coding.mdc
• 125-java-concurrency.mdc <- Limited to one class
• 126-java-logging.mdc <- One class in the context, not the whole package.
• 127-java-functional-exception-handling
• 131-java-unit-testing.mdc <- One class in the context
• 141-java-refactoring-with-modern-features.mdc
• 142-java-functional-programming.mdc
• 143-java-data-oriented-programming.mdc

[jabrena]

• 110-java-maven-best-practices.mdc
  • Which combination would you prefer? Recommended: "1A, 2A, 3A" for pluginManagement + properties + basic metadata. Or specify your preferred options (e.g., "1B, 2A, 3C").
  • Not show the alternatives

Second iteration:

Review the pom.xml following the best practices showing several alternatives thanks to the cursor rule 
@110-java-maven-best-practices Show the alternatives in the output, not in a file

I've analyzed your pom.xml and found 4 main improvement areas: missing plugin management (CRITICAL), hardcoded BOM version (MAINTAINABILITY), missing project metadata (STRUCTURE), and no build optimization (PERFORMANCE). 

I can show you 3 implementation approaches:
1. Conservative - minimal changes, low risk
2. Balanced - industry standard setup (recommended)  
3. Enterprise-grade - comprehensive quality gates

• 112-java-maven-plugins.mdc
  • What type of project is this? (Library/CLI/Microservice/Other)
  • Which plugins do you want me to add? (Code coverage/Static analysis/Security scanning/Integration testing/All recommended)
• 121-java-object-oriented-design.mdc
  • Only it is possible to select one class
  • Create a file and later, you need to prompt with that date.
• 122-java-type-design.mdc
  • Create a md with the options and later appear the prompt to choose the option. Not bad
  • Verify changes with ./mvnw clean verify

Second iteration

I've analyzed your FilmService.java for type design improvements per cursor rule @122. Found 4 key issues: primitive obsession with String parameter, missing Optional usage, generic exception handling, and single method with multiple responsibilities. 

Which improvement approach would you like me to implement?
- A) Create FilmSearchLetter value object (low risk, immediate type safety)
- B) Add custom exception hierarchy (better error handling) 
- C) Implement search strategy pattern (high extensibility)
- D) Combine A + B (comprehensive but manageable)

Or would you like more details on any specific option?

• 123-java-general-guidelines.mdc

1. CRITICAL: Filename typo in test file (MainApplicaitonAcceptanceIT.java)
2. MAINTAINABILITY: Generic exception handling in service layer  
3. MAINTAINABILITY: Code duplication in exception handlers
4. READABILITY: Missing Javadoc in MainApplication.java

Which specific improvements would you like me to implement? Please specify your choices (e.g., "1A, 2A, 3A") or ask for more details about any option. 

• 124-java-secure-coding.mdc
  • Create file, the implementation for enforcer was a nightmare.

			<!-- Maven Enforcer Plugin -->
			<plugin>
				<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
				<artifactId>maven-enforcer-plugin</artifactId>
				<version>${maven-plugin-enforcer.version}</version>
				<dependencies>
					<dependency>
						<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
						<artifactId>extra-enforcer-rules</artifactId>
						<version>${extra-enforcer-rules.version}</version>
					</dependency>
				</dependencies>
				<executions>
					<execution>
						<id>enforce</id>
						<configuration>
							<rules>
								<banCircularDependencies/>
								<dependencyConvergence />
								<banDuplicatePomDependencyVersions />
								<requireMavenVersion>
									<version>${maven.version}</version>
								</requireMavenVersion>
								<requireJavaVersion>
									<version>${java.version}</version>
								</requireJavaVersion>
								<bannedDependencies>
									<excludes>
										<!-- Code generation libraries -->
										<exclude>org.projectlombok:lombok</exclude>

										<!-- Vulnerable logging libraries -->
										<exclude>log4j:log4j:[1.0,1.2.17)</exclude>
										<exclude>org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core:[2.0,2.17.0)</exclude>
										<exclude>ch.qos.logback:logback-core:[0,1.2.9)</exclude>

										<!-- Vulnerable JSON processing libraries -->
										<exclude>com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:[0,2.9.10.8)</exclude>
										<exclude>org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-mapper-asl:[0,1.9.13]</exclude>

										<!-- Vulnerable XML processing libraries -->
										<exclude>xerces:xercesImpl:[0,2.12.1)</exclude>
										<exclude>xml-apis:xml-apis:[0,1.4.01]</exclude>

										<!-- Vulnerable HTTP client libraries -->
										<exclude>org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient:[0,4.5.13)</exclude>
										<exclude>commons-httpclient:commons-httpclient:[0,3.1]</exclude>

										<!-- Vulnerable Spring Framework versions -->
										<exclude>org.springframework:spring-core:[0,5.3.21)</exclude>
										<exclude>org.springframework:spring-web:[0,5.3.21)</exclude>
										<exclude>org.springframework:spring-webmvc:[0,5.3.21)</exclude>

										<!-- Vulnerable serialization libraries -->
										<exclude>commons-collections:commons-collections:[0,3.2.2]</exclude>
										<exclude>org.apache.commons:commons-collections4:[0,4.1]</exclude>

										<!-- Vulnerable cryptography libraries -->
										<exclude>org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on:[0,1.69)</exclude>
										<exclude>org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk15on:[0,1.69)</exclude>

										<!-- Vulnerable database drivers -->
										<exclude>mysql:mysql-connector-java:[0,8.0.28)</exclude>
										<exclude>org.postgresql:postgresql:[0,42.3.3)</exclude>

										<!-- Vulnerable template engines -->
										<exclude>org.freemarker:freemarker:[0,2.3.31)</exclude>
										<exclude>org.apache.velocity:velocity:[0,1.7]</exclude>

										<!-- Vulnerable compression libraries -->
										<exclude>org.apache.commons:commons-compress:[0,1.21)</exclude>

										<!-- Vulnerable YAML processing -->
										<exclude>org.yaml:snakeyaml:[0,1.31)</exclude>
									</excludes>
									<message>
										Security Policy Violation: This dependency version contains known security vulnerabilities.
										Please update to a secure version or find an alternative library.
										For more information, check: https://nvd.nist.gov/
									</message>
								</bannedDependencies>
							</rules>
							<fail>true</fail>
						</configuration>
						<goals>
							<goal>enforce</goal>
						</goals>
					</execution>
				</executions>
			</plugin>

• 125-java-concurrency.mdc
  • Generate a file

[jabrena]

Side effects:

• The changes done by models are not reverted at 100%, it is necessary to use the git utility to remove or revert changes.

DX:

• The response is so much slow in contrast with other options

[jabrena]

• 126-java-logging.mdc
  • Review my code for logging showing several alternatives thanks to the cursor rule @126-java-logging. Show the alternatives in the output, not in a file

Junie doesn´t show the option as output or create a markdown

I've analyzed your Spring Boot application's logging implementation. 
You have a solid SLF4J foundation, but there are 5 key areas for improvement. 
Please choose which solutions you'd like me to implement: 1) Configuration (A/B/C), 2) Monitoring (A/B/C), 3) Security (A/B/C), 4) Performance (A/B/C), 5) Testing (A/B/C). For example: "1A, 2C, 3A, 4B, 5A" or ask for more details about any option.

Second iteration:

I've analyzed your logging implementation and found 5 key improvement areas. 
Your current SLF4J setup is good, but you're missing comprehensive coverage, environment-specific configuration, security logging, performance monitoring, and advanced configuration. 
Which specific improvements would you like me to implement? 
You can choose specific options (like "1A, 2B") or ask for a "comprehensive solution" or "production readiness" focus.

If the context is only one Class, the result is acceptable, if you select the whole repo, it is impossible.

• 124-java-secure-coding.mdc

I've identified 3 security issues in your FilmService.java: 1) Information disclosure in exception handling (HIGH), 2) Missing input validation (MEDIUM), and 3) Logging security concerns (MEDIUM). 

Which security improvements would you like me to implement?
- Option A: Fix exception handling only (fastest)
- Option B: Input validation + secure exceptions
- Option C: Address all security issues comprehensively
- Option D: Show detailed code for a specific issue first

Please choose your preferred approach (A, B, C, D) or specify which specific issues you'd like me to focus on.

[jabrena]

• Review my code for functional exception handling showing several alternatives thanks to the cursor rule @127-java-functional-exception-handling Show the alternatives in the output, not in a file

I provided a concise analysis of the FilmService.java code highlighting three alternatives for functional exception handling: Option A with a Result Type, Option B using Exceptions as a Result, and Option C with a Validation-First Approach. The user was asked to choose a preferred option to implement the complete solution. No final outcome was achieved as the user did not confirm a choice.

[jabrena]

• 131-java-unit-testing.mdc

The interaction is added in the root project

[jabrena]

• 141-java-refactoring-with-modern-features

I've analyzed your FilmService.java for modern Java improvements. 
Found 3 key areas: (1) Optional API for null checks, (2) Functional exception handling, (3) var usage. 
Which specific options would you like me to implement: 1A/1B for Optional, 2A/2B for exceptions, 3A/3B for variables? 
Or would you like me to show you a specific refactoring example first?

[jabrena]

• 142-java-functional-programming

Which functional programming approach would you like me to implement for your FilmService? 

A) Optional-based pipeline (simple, immediate benefit)
B) Pure functions with Records (balanced modern approach) 
C) Sealed types with pattern matching (advanced modern Java)

[jabrena]

• 143-java-data-oriented-programming

I found 3 data-oriented programming improvements in FilmService.java:

1. MAINTAINABILITY: Mixed concerns (validation, logging, data access in one method)
2. CLARITY: Impure function with side effects 
3. PERFORMANCE: Exception-based control flow

Options:
A) Minimal - Extract pure validation functions, keep Spring structure
B) Moderate - Functional pipeline with Result/Optional types
C) Complete - Full data-oriented redesign with generic validation

Which approach would you like me to implement?