Skip to content

x/tools/gopls: generate method stubs for a given interface #37537

Closed
@marwan-at-work

Description

@marwan-at-work

Proposal (TL;DR):

It would be great if Gopls implemented a way where a user:

  1. Moves the cursor to a type declaration
  2. Gets a list of all interface declarations within the workspace
  3. Picks an interface for gopls to generate method stubs for.

See this video for a demonstration: https://vimeo.com/394345925

Details

A common feature that Go and other typed languages have is to generate method stubs for an interface that a type wants to implement.

For most languages, the concrete type must declare what interface it intends to implement. This makes it easier for tools to generate those stubs.

For an example, take a look at this screenshot from TypeScript in VSCode:

Screen Shot 2020-02-27 at 1 59 07 PM

Notice that type X implements Greeter and therefore the dropdown knows which method it needs to stub out.

In Go, it is impossible to know that because interfaces are implicitly implemented.

Therefore, generating method stubs require a two step process:

  1. You pick the interface declaration that you'd like an interface to implement
  2. You pick the concrete type you'd like to add method-stubs to.

Therefore, I wrote a tool that that can do both of these features: https://github.com/marwan-at-work/impl

Here's a video of how I integrated the tool with VSCode locally to demonstrate the same feature working for Go: https://vimeo.com/394345925

However, the tool uses go/packages directly and is obviously a standalone that doesn't leverage gopls with its cache and environment. Therefore, I suggest we make this a feature within gopls.

If this is something worth including, I'd be very happy to port the work I did into gopls (with a little help).

Unfortunately, the LSP protocol does not have an explicit message for "generating method stubs", and so we a few options were brought up in slack that I want to highlight here:

  1. Use CodeAction -> refactor.extract / quickfix
  2. Use noneStandardRequest
  3. Hacking around Autocomplete

cc: @stamblerre @hyangah -- I'm not sure which of the above is the best way, but I'm happy to take on whichever you think is best 👍

PS. Note that this tool used to exist in GOPATH mode using https://github.com/josharian/impl but as far as I know, it is not modules aware and lacked a number of features such as "listing available interfaces" and "automatically adding import paths"

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    FeatureRequestIssues asking for a new feature that does not need a proposal.FrozenDueToAgeToolsThis label describes issues relating to any tools in the x/tools repository.goplsIssues related to the Go language server, gopls.release-blocker

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions