Description
Hi there,
I am building a reverse proxy using vertx-http-proxy (4.5.14) - Java 17 - Linux . In some cases the origin is selected after querying a DB that has some kind of routing information using a key provided in the request.
For building the proxied request I am using
static ProxyRequest reverseProxy(HttpServerRequest proxiedRequest)
In some cases this method throws
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Request has already been read
at io.vertx.core.http.impl.Http2ServerRequest.checkEnded(Http2ServerRequest.java:205) ~[vertx-core-4.5.14.jar:4.5.14]
at io.vertx.core.http.impl.Http2ServerRequest.pause(Http2ServerRequest.java:257) ~[vertx-core-4.5.14.jar:4.5.14]
at io.vertx.httpproxy.ProxyRequest.reverseProxy(ProxyRequest.java:41) ~[vertx-http-proxy-4.5.14.jar:4.5.14]
at com.chevaris.plt.proxy.router.Proxy.sendProxyRequest(Proxy.java:260) ~[classes/:?]
at com.chevaris.plt.proxy.router.Proxy.lambda$13(Proxy.java:243) ~[classes/:?]
at com.chevaris.plt.proxy.router.VertxBulkhead.executeFuture(VertxBulkhead.java:30) ~[classes/:?]
at com.chevaris.plt.proxy.router.Proxy.lambda$11(Proxy.java:233) ~[classes/:?]
at io.vertx.core.impl.future.Composition.onSuccess(Composition.java:38) ~[vertx-core-4.5.14.jar:4.5.14]
at io.vertx.core.impl.future.FutureBase.emitSuccess(FutureBase.java:66) ~[vertx-core-4.5.14.jar:4.5.14]
at io.vertx.core.impl.future.FutureImpl.tryComplete(FutureImpl.java:259) ~[vertx-core-4.5.14.jar:4.5.14]
at io.vertx.core.impl.future.Composition$1.onSuccess(Composition.java:62) ~[vertx-core-4.5.14.jar:4.5.14]
at io.vertx.core.impl.future.FutureBase.emitSuccess(FutureBase.java:66) ~[vertx-core-4.5.14.jar:4.5.14]
at io.vertx.core.impl.future.SucceededFuture.addListener(SucceededFuture.java:88) ~[vertx-core-4.5.14.jar:4.5.14]
at io.vertx.core.impl.future.Composition.onSuccess(Composition.java:43) ~[vertx-core-4.5.14.jar:4.5.14]
at io.vertx.core.impl.future.FutureBase.lambda$emitSuccess$0(FutureBase.java:60) ~[vertx-core-4.5.14.jar:4.5.14]
at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.runTask(AbstractEventExecutor.java:173) ~[netty-common-4.1.118.Final.jar:4.1.118.Final]
at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.safeExecute(AbstractEventExecutor.java:166) ~[netty-common-4.1.118.Final.jar:4.1.118.Final]
at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor.runAllTasks(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:472) ~[netty-common-4.1.118.Final.jar:4.1.118.Final]
at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:569) ~[netty-transport-4.1.118.Final.jar:4.1.118.Final]
at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:998) ~[netty-common-4.1.118.Final.jar:4.1.118.Final]
at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74) ~[netty-common-4.1.118.Final.jar:4.1.118.Final]
at io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30) ~[netty-common-4.1.118.Final.jar:4.1.118.Final]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840) ~[?:?]
Checking the code I have seen that ProxyRequest and ProxiedRequest relies on that fact that original HttpServerRequest to build the ProxiedRequest instance is NOT ended (that could NOT be always the case, depending on timing/business logic). The issue call be avoided creating the proxiedrequest at the beginning of the flow when the original request is NOT ended (at least should be documented if that is expected in my view), BUT I think the code should be more flexible checking if the request is ended or NOT in order to do the right thing in both cases.
Regards,
Chevaris