Closed
Description
We're using version 0.0.12, but I've noticed there's also 0.0.13 now (https://github.com/sogaiu/tree-sitter-clojure/releases/tag/v0.0.13). @rrudakov Perhaps you wouldn't mind testing how things work with it?
We're using version 0.0.12, but I've noticed there's also 0.0.13 now (https://github.com/sogaiu/tree-sitter-clojure/releases/tag/v0.0.13). @rrudakov Perhaps you wouldn't mind testing how things work with it?
Activity
bbatsov commentedon Apr 10, 2025
I'm guessing updating https://github.com/tree-sitter-grammars/tree-sitter-markdown/releases/tag/v0.4.1 might help with #60 - I see the version we're using is ancient at this point.
rrudakov commentedon Apr 10, 2025
I'll test it. From the changelog it looks like there were no any API changes.
rrudakov commentedon Apr 10, 2025
Will try it too.
My current guess is that range might be calculated incorrectly when you type in a single backtick in the docstring (because in this case the rest of the buffer is highlighted as a docstring), but I planned to investigate it in more details. Updating grammar is not a bad idea either.
rrudakov commentedon Apr 10, 2025
Note: our
clojure-ts--ensure-grammars
won't upgrade grammars if they were already installed (even if version is old). Maybe it would be a good idea to addclojure-ts-upgrade-grammars
or something like that.bbatsov commentedon Apr 10, 2025
Yeah, that's a good idea.
[clojure-emacs#77] Update grammars
[clojure-emacs#77] Update grammars
[clojure-emacs#77] Update grammars
[#77] Update grammars