You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is Your Feature Request Related To A Problem? Please describe.
No, it's just unnecessary info/difference from other package managers.
Describe The Solution. Why is it needed?
Remove the - yes to all part of the [A]ll prompt. It's a difference from all other modern package managers, and I think you should assume the end user knows what [A]ll means and if the they don't they can look it up easily.
Additional Context.
N/A
Related Issues
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After some discussion with the Chocolatey team, it has been decided that
the prompt option for "All - yes to all" is rather verbose, and the need
to include "yes to all" is unneeded, and not in line with how other
package managers do it when prompted with similar choices.
This commit removes the "All - yes to all" and replaces it with simply
"All scripts", which is more succinct. In addition, the unit/pester
tests have been updated to reflect this change. It was necessary to
remove a unit test, since in the previous prompt "all - yes to all" was
actually treated as two options, split on the "-", i.e. both "all" and
"all - yes to all" were accepted answers to the prompt. This is no
longer the case when the option is "All scripts", so only one unit test
is now required.
gep13
pushed a commit
to lemonlambda/choco
that referenced
this issue
May 29, 2025
After some discussion with the Chocolatey team, it has been decided that
the prompt option for "All - yes to all" is rather verbose, and the need
to include "yes to all" is unneeded, and not in line with how other
package managers do it when prompted with similar choices.
This commit removes the "All - yes to all" and replaces it with simply
"All scripts", which is more succinct. In addition, the unit/pester
tests have been updated to reflect this change. It was necessary to
remove a unit test, since in the previous prompt "all - yes to all" was
actually treated as two options, split on the "-", i.e. both "all" and
"all - yes to all" were accepted answers to the prompt. This is no
longer the case when the option is "All scripts", so only one unit test
is now required.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Is Your Feature Request Related To A Problem? Please describe.
No, it's just unnecessary info/difference from other package managers.
Describe The Solution. Why is it needed?
Remove the
- yes to all
part of the[A]ll
prompt. It's a difference from all other modern package managers, and I think you should assume the end user knows what[A]ll
means and if the they don't they can look it up easily.Additional Context.
N/A
Related Issues
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: