We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
These questions were prompted by discussion around proposal #5434 .
How should we spell value form returns at a high level? Should we have
bound
If the answer is one of the first two, should the explicit marker leverage the keyword let? If not, what keyword or symbol should be employed here?
let
If we do pick the keyword let, should we rename terminology to use that keyword as well? And how much terminology?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note that these questions (in addition to some others) were discussed in the open discussion, with notes that folks interested can dig through here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Yt-i5AmF76LSvD4TrWRIAE_92kii6j5yFiW-S7ahzlg/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.uot97ukynlsi
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
These questions were prompted by discussion around proposal #5434 .
How should we spell value form returns at a high level? Should we have
bound
parameters?If the answer is one of the first two, should the explicit marker leverage the keyword
let
? If not, what keyword or symbol should be employed here?If we do pick the keyword
let
, should we rename terminology to use that keyword as well? And how much terminology?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: