-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
Open
Labels
need: discussionWe have to do some design work in a meetingWe have to do some design work in a meeting
Description
I'm interested in a rule that takes a shell command string as input like genrule
but supports directories as outputs like run_binary
. Would the maintainers of this library be receptive to a PR adding one?
My intuition would be to add a rule run_shell
that shares a lot of the code of run_binary
. But I can also imagine just adding a parameter to run_binary
(incompatible with tool
).
Yes, one can just use run_binary
with sh_binary
, but that requires to targets instead of one, plus a .sh
file (or a third write_file
target). If your script is more than a few lines, that's probably the better approach anyways, but it feels like a lot of boilerplate when I just want to do a simple transformation over an indeterminate number of files.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
need: discussionWe have to do some design work in a meetingWe have to do some design work in a meeting