You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Context
This thread covered container-based deployments on AWS ECS (primarily EC2-backed), concerns about flow run container startup latency, and how to approach parallel execution/task runners in Prefect 3.x. The goal is to document concrete trade-offs, working patterns, and places where docs could be clearer for teams running Prefect on ECS.
Deployments from source instead of Prefect 2.x patterns. In 3.x, build-and-run is via flow.from_source(...).deploy(...).
Parallelism: task runners allow intra-container concurrency (e.g., Concurrent/ThreadPool) and distributed execution via integrations (e.g., DaskTaskRunner from prefect-dask, RayTaskRunner from prefect-ray). Choice impacts latency and resource usage.
Observed pain points and questions
ECS cold start latency dominates short/interactive jobs
Each flow run may wait on container scheduling, image pull, and dependency install.
Fargate cold-starts can be especially noticeable; EC2-backed clusters with warm capacity and cached images are faster, but doc guidance is light.
What to put in ECS job variables (and where)
Users need a clear mapping of ECS job variables (cluster, taskDefinition, cpu/memory, capacity provider/launch type, networkConfiguration, taskRole/executionRole, platformVersion, tags, env, command overrides) to Prefect’s configuration surfaces (work pool default job template vs per-deployment overrides). The current docs are terse for common setups.
Parallel execution guidance inside containers vs across containers
It’s not always clear when to scale up a single container (thread/process/Dask/Ray inside one task slot) vs scaling out via more flow runs / mapped tasks as separate ECS tasks.
Guidance on mixing subflows, mapping, and task runners on ECS would help; e.g., avoiding excessive fan-out that amplifies scheduling latency.
Migration gotchas from Prefect 2.x to 3.x
Removed APIs like Deployment.build_from_flow and prefect deployment build create confusion for existing users; concise 3.x examples would help.
Practical patterns that helped
Reduce cold start time
Bake fully self-contained images (no pip install at runtime); minimize layers and image size.
Prefer EC2-backed ECS with capacity providers and a small warm pool; pre-pull images on nodes or use a registry cache to avoid image pulls on the critical path.
Reuse base images across deployments so caches hit more often.
Balance parallelism
For light concurrency within a single run, use the default task runner (Concurrent/ThreadPool) and keep CPU-bound work small.
For real parallel compute, use DaskTaskRunner or RayTaskRunner and provision an in-cluster scheduler/cluster—this avoids spawning many ECS tasks per small unit of work.
For many independent jobs, consider larger task granularity to amortize container startup overhead.
ECS job configuration
Centralize defaults in the ECS Work Pool template (cluster, network, roles, capacity provider) and keep deployment-level overrides minimal (cpu/mem and env per flow).
Ensure taskRole/executionRole allow image pulls, logs, and result storage (e.g., S3) as needed.
Docs gaps and suggested improvements
An “ECS latency playbook” comparing EC2 vs Fargate, with concrete tactics to reduce time-to-first-log (warm capacity, image caches, smaller images, no runtime installs).
End-to-end ECS examples that show:
A job template for EC2-backed clusters (capacityProviderStrategy, networkConfiguration)
A job template for Fargate (launchType, platformVersion, awsvpc config)
Where to set defaults (work pool) vs overrides (deployment) with annotated examples.
A clear 3.x migration box: “If you used Deployment.build_from_flow() in 2.x, here’s the 3.x flow.from_source(...).deploy(...) pattern.”
A guide on parallelism choices: task runners vs distributed backends vs scaling out deployments—how each impacts latency, cost, and observability on ECS.
Observability tips: measuring queue-to-start vs start-to-running; ensuring logs/results land in S3/CloudWatch; recommended tags/labels.
Open questions for the community
What startup latency targets are you achieving on ECS EC2 vs Fargate for typical images? What tactics moved the needle most?
Do you prefer intra-container parallelism (threads/processes) or distributed backends (Dask/Ray) for ECS? Why?
Any gotchas with capacity provider strategies, platform versions, or task role permissions that others should know?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This discussion was created from a Slack thread conversation.
Original Thread: https://prefect-community.slack.com/archives/CL09KU1K7/p1756927029243749
Context
This thread covered container-based deployments on AWS ECS (primarily EC2-backed), concerns about flow run container startup latency, and how to approach parallel execution/task runners in Prefect 3.x. The goal is to document concrete trade-offs, working patterns, and places where docs could be clearer for teams running Prefect on ECS.
What works today in Prefect 3
Observed pain points and questions
ECS cold start latency dominates short/interactive jobs
What to put in ECS job variables (and where)
Parallel execution guidance inside containers vs across containers
Migration gotchas from Prefect 2.x to 3.x
Practical patterns that helped
Reduce cold start time
Balance parallelism
ECS job configuration
Docs gaps and suggested improvements
Open questions for the community
References
We’d love feedback on the above and pointers to additional patterns we can standardize in the docs.
This discussion was automatically created by the Marvin bot to preserve valuable community insights.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions