Skip to content

Commit 118947a

Browse files
committed
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:HTTPArchive/almanac.httparchive.org into production
2 parents 6a9289e + 317a918 commit 118947a

File tree

6 files changed

+56
-53
lines changed

6 files changed

+56
-53
lines changed

src/config/last_updated.json

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -753,8 +753,8 @@
753753
},
754754
"en/2024/chapters/accessibility.html": {
755755
"date_published": "2024-11-11T00:00:00.000Z",
756-
"date_modified": "2024-11-16T00:00:00.000Z",
757-
"hash": "0bfc638d1bdf26254e1c83e01857a7fe"
756+
"date_modified": "2024-11-21T00:00:00.000Z",
757+
"hash": "18dba531871c39af3383aee9cc0de50e"
758758
},
759759
"en/2024/chapters/cdn.html": {
760760
"date_published": "2024-11-11T00:00:00.000Z",
@@ -778,8 +778,8 @@
778778
},
779779
"en/2024/chapters/ecommerce.html": {
780780
"date_published": "2024-11-11T00:00:00.000Z",
781-
"date_modified": "2024-11-16T00:00:00.000Z",
782-
"hash": "1197b631e967c9866d847221663d3054"
781+
"date_modified": "2024-11-21T00:00:00.000Z",
782+
"hash": "1d744116bde5acd029eba83f60cb5ce4"
783783
},
784784
"en/2024/chapters/fonts.html": {
785785
"date_published": "2024-11-11T00:00:00.000Z",

src/content/en/2024/accessibility.md

Lines changed: 9 additions & 9 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ There are two means by which we can identify country information, first by the G
840840
{{ figure_markup(
841841
image="country-by-geoid.png",
842842
caption="Most accessible countries by GeoID.",
843-
description="A bar cart with the GeoID, the country with the highest average for accessibility is the USA with a value of 84%. There is a drop of less a perscent as we move to Canada, UK, Australia, Germany, Netherlands, France, Mexico, Italy, Spain, Argentina, Indonesia, India, Poland, Brazil, Japan, Turkey, Vietnam, China and finally the Republic of Korea with 78%. These were for countries that hosted more than 100000 domains.",
843+
description="A bar chart with the GeoID, the country with the highest average for accessibility is the USA with a value of 84%. There is a drop of less a perscent as we move to Canada, UK, Australia, Germany, Netherlands, France, Mexico, Italy, Spain, Argentina, Indonesia, India, Poland, Brazil, Japan, Turkey, Vietnam, China and finally the Republic of Korea with 78%. These were for countries that hosted more than 100000 domains.",
844844
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=421126157&format=interactive",
845845
sheets_gid="260430925",
846846
sql_file="lighthouse_score_by_country.sql",
@@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ But it is a bit easier to see the TLD ranked and including the non-country codes
868868
{{ figure_markup(
869869
image="country-by-tld.png",
870870
caption="Accessible countries by Top Level Domain (TLD).",
871-
description="A bar cart with looking at Top Level Domains with more than 45,000 domains, we learn about accessibility. Displayed as a bar chart with the accessible domains .edu (Education), .gov (US Government), Norway, Filand, .io, Canada, USA, .app, UK, Sweden, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, .co, Austria, Belgium, Switzerland, Denmark, and South Africa, .org.",
871+
description="A bar chart with looking at Top Level Domains with more than 45,000 domains, we learn about accessibility. Displayed as a bar chart with the accessible domains .edu (Education), .gov (US Government), Norway, Filand, .io, Canada, USA, .app, UK, Sweden, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, .co, Austria, Belgium, Switzerland, Denmark, and South Africa, .org.",
872872
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=783736776&format=interactive",
873873
sheets_gid="1209052596",
874874
sql_file="lighthouse_score_by_tld.sql"
@@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ Not all government domains follow consistent accessibility rules, however we wer
884884
{{ figure_markup(
885885
image="accessible-governments.png",
886886
caption="Most accessible government websites.",
887-
description="A bar cart with with the most accessible global governments. The Netherlands (98%), Luxembourg (96%), Finland (94%), UK (92%), European Union (91%), Norway (91%), Jersey (91%), Singapore (92%), Belgium (91%), Germany (91%), France (90%), Australia (89%), New Zealand (89%), Dnmark (89%). ",
887+
description="A bar chart with with the most accessible global governments. The Netherlands (98%), Luxembourg (96%), Finland (94%), UK (92%), European Union (91%), Norway (91%), Jersey (91%), Singapore (92%), Belgium (91%), Germany (91%), France (90%), Australia (89%), New Zealand (89%), Dnmark (89%). ",
888888
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=415917251&format=interactive",
889889
sheets_gid="720509689",
890890
sql_file="lighthouse_score_by_government.sql"
@@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ We can also review the accessibility of various states.
912912
{{ figure_markup(
913913
image="US-state-governments.png",
914914
caption="The most accessible US state governments.",
915-
description="A bar cart with with the most accessible states in the US. Colorado (96%), Vermont (94%), Nevada (93%), South Carolina (91%), Georgia (91%), North Carolina (91%), Kansas (90%), Maine (90%), California (90%), New York (90%), Hawaii (89%), DC (89%), Rhode Island (89%), Missouri (89%), Massachusettes (89%), New Hampshire (89%), Minnesota (89%), Michigan (88%), Oregon (88%), Iowa (88%).",
915+
description="A bar chart with with the most accessible states in the US. Colorado (96%), Vermont (94%), Nevada (93%), South Carolina (91%), Georgia (91%), North Carolina (91%), Kansas (90%), Maine (90%), California (90%), New York (90%), Hawaii (89%), DC (89%), Rhode Island (89%), Missouri (89%), Massachusettes (89%), New Hampshire (89%), Minnesota (89%), Michigan (88%), Oregon (88%), Iowa (88%).",
916916
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=174949843&format=interactive",
917917
sheets_gid="720509689",
918918
sql_file="lighthouse_score_by_government.sql",
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ When most folks think about CMS, they think about the ones that you can download
944944

945945
{{ figure_markup(
946946
image="traditional-cms.png",
947-
caption="A bar cart with the accessible traditional Content Management Systems (CMS).",
947+
caption="A bar chart with the accessible traditional Content Management Systems (CMS).",
948948
description="The most accessible CMS with over 10,000 instances are AEM (87%), Contentful (87%), Sitecore (85%), WordPress (85%), Craft CMS (84%), Contao (84%), Drupal (84%), Liferay (83%), TypoCMS (83%), DNN (82%).",
949949
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=174688785&format=interactive",
950950
sheets_gid="686463338",
@@ -1016,11 +1016,11 @@ The different CMS do have a lot of commonalities in the top errors that they hav
10161016

10171017
There are many tools which can be used to help authors evaluate the accessibility of a page. Institutions that control the browser configurations of their staff, could choose to simply install the open source <a hreflang="en" href="https://accessibilityinsights.io/docs/web/getstarted/assessment/">Accessibility Insights</a> browser plugin for all of their browsers. This would make errors much more visible to administrators. For many of the CMS above though, the best solution might be to install a tool like <a hreflang="en" href="https://sa11y.netlify.app/">Sa11y</a> or <a hreflang="en" href="https://editoria11y.princeton.edu/">Editoria11y</a> which is geared to help authors. From Joomla version 4.1 onwards <a hreflang="en" href="https://sa11y.netlify.app/joomla/">Sa11y is included by default</a>, so all authors benefit.
10181018

1019-
Website platforms in general performed better than the tTraditional CMS with Wix, Squarespace and Google Sites being significantly better.
1019+
Website platforms in general performed better than the Traditional CMS with Wix, Squarespace and Google Sites being significantly better.
10201020

10211021
{{ figure_markup(
10221022
image="platform-cms.png",
1023-
caption="A bar cart with the most accessible Website Platform Content Management Systems (CMS).",
1023+
caption="A bar chart with the most accessible Website Platform Content Management Systems (CMS).",
10241024
description="A bar graph with with the most accessible CMS: Wix (94%), Squarespace (92%), Google Sites (90%), Duda (87%), HubSpot CMS (87%), Pixnet (86%), Weebly (86%), GoDaddy Website Builder (85%), WebNode (84%), Tilda (83%).",
10251025
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=1383581431&format=interactive",
10261026
sheets_gid="686463338",
@@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ The differences show that it is possible for CMS to make an impact on accessibil
11011101
{{ figure_markup(
11021102
image="javascript-frontend-ui.png",
11031103
caption="Most Accessible JavaScript Frontend UI Frameworks.",
1104-
description="A bar cart with ranked with Stimulus (91%), Remix (89%), Owik (89%), Astro (89%), OpenUI5 (89%), Next.js (87%), React (87%), AlpineJS (86%), Htmx (85%), Svelte (85%), Ember.js (85%).",
1104+
description="A bar chart with ranked with Stimulus (91%), Remix (89%), Owik (89%), Astro (89%), OpenUI5 (89%), Next.js (87%), React (87%), AlpineJS (86%), Htmx (85%), Svelte (85%), Ember.js (85%).",
11051105
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=1864888468&format=interactive",
11061106
sheets_gid="1029816121",
11071107
sql_file="lighthouse_score_by_frontend.sql"
@@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ Stimulus, Remix and Qwik are several percent more accessible on average than Rea
11131113
{{ figure_markup(
11141114
image="javascript-meta-frameworks.png",
11151115
caption="Most Accessible JavaScript Meta-frameworks.",
1116-
description="A bar cart with meta-frameworks are in the following order RedwoodJS (92%), Remix (89%), Astro (89%), SolidStart(88%), Gatsby (88%), Next.js (87%), Nuxt.js (84%), AdonisJS (82%), Quasar (82%), Meteor (73%).",
1116+
description="A bar chart with meta-frameworks are in the following order RedwoodJS (92%), Remix (89%), Astro (89%), SolidStart(88%), Gatsby (88%), Next.js (87%), Nuxt.js (84%), AdonisJS (82%), Quasar (82%), Meteor (73%).",
11171117
chart_url="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ32BLKultx6YJbcQP5DB6a4NTnf4h9RCC3QXte5oS-Onx-9cFqiPQ23dWgWgffj2QA1Q60zhrxJVYb/pubchart?oid=506578618&format=interactive",
11181118
sheets_gid="1029816121",
11191119
sql_file="lighthouse_score_by_frontend.sql"

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)