Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I actually think it does, we haven't updated the upper bounds on versions. I have created PR #259. If the checks passed it will be merged in (it they don't I will update the package such that it support 3.6). Thanks for letting us know. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Thanks both. Tests passed and #259 has been merged. @Yihtsy do let us know if you run into any issues using SpaCy 3.6! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It is kind of inconvenient if I have to oscillate between spacy 3.5.4 and 3.6.0. Hopefully it would support the latest version of SpaCy in the future.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions